University R&D

ECONOMISTS: Like Big Pharma – No CURE Blowhards

Posted on by Helena

While US factories began relocating to Mexico as far back as the 1960’s, it was in 1994 when NAFTA facilitated further moves.  The reasons were primarily low cost labor and lax environmental regulations which boosted profits.  By 2010, 1/3 of all US manufacturing had  disappeared leaving huge employment gaps to the tune of 6 million job losses and contributing to the 2008 Recession.  By 2015, the US trade deficit in manufacturing hit a whopping $832 BILLION.

To make matters worse, the manufacturing sector of both Japan and Germany post WWII was propped up US Taxpayers via the Marshall Plan.  Furthering the shift, R&D money given to Universities was spent mostly on Big Pharma instead of innovation, leaving the US behind as China sprung forward.  And the final gasp came when financial institutions pushed for outsourcing to better the bottom line and move away from vertically integrated companies. 

Like social credit or DEI – if companies didn’t tow the mandate, they lost contracts and funding opportunities.   Banks Ruled.  Tipping the scales of manufacturing into the abyss.  Making America dependent on the whims of import duties imposed by EU countries, China, Japan, and the South Asian countries.    

It was Apple’s success in its business model wherein all manufacturing was done in China that prompted a slew of US manufacturers to abandon America for greener pastures and higher profits – which translated into CEO pockets bulging with cash. 

Where did China get it’s R&D?   From Israel mostly.  In the 1980’s Israel sold technology to upgrade Chinese tanks, planes, radar, missiles, navigation systems, and unmanned aerial vehicle technology.   Why would Israel want to compromise America?  CIA Director, James Woolsey brought the claim to Congress in 1993 claiming it had been ongoing for a decade and at the time amounted to multiple BILLIONS. 

In fact, the alliance between Israel and China has grown so strong that US aid to Israel is no longer necessary and China supports Israel’s right to Palestinian genocide.  In other words, Israel bought China’s allegiance by undermining US military secrets. 

The classic elite naysayers have come out in full manic panic over Trump’s Tariffs, ignoring the fact that over 100 countries have now come to the negotiating table.  Not one of the naysayers has a solution, they simply promote their ‘expert voice’ to deride, complain, and hack the Trump agenda.  The gob-speak has become something akin to liberal vaccine rhetoric!  Ignore facts!  Provide no alternatives.  Just Scream the loudest. 

Nothing about the debt and the interest obligation, nothing about the deficit spending, nothing about manufacturing, R&D, or massive government waste…  Pool’s of supposed Economic PhD’s pushing – you can’t,  it won’t, impossible, bad, really bad, until the sound of their voices in unison sound like a Squad Parade of Fools & Jesters.   These same jesters working at various neo-NGO’s who have been backstabbing China for a decade are onboard China’s trade deficit simply to deride Trump…

When I was a University student, Economists were considered one of the joke professions.  They make no contribution to society.  Their predictions are routinely false.  And betting against their advice was the only way to profit.  Adding a PhD to their stable of degrees only seems to make them a bigger jackass. 

Economic analysts at Goldman Sachs in January 2021:  “lockdowns will hit the economy, but not too hard.”  Lockdowns destroyed the economy.  After the “Pandemic” – The Tragedy of Economist Apologists…  Then there is this lovely tidbit:  Economists agree that inflation is caused by an increase in the money supply.  Reality.  Government spending causes inflation.  Government expansion causes over-spending.  Printing money for deficit spending by the Government – causes inflation. 

Economists are like Big Pharma – they cure nothing.  The world would not miss them should this career become obsolete.  Most become anti-matter writers for pundit magazines and liberal media because their worth is $-0-.   Their largest employer?  The Federal Government.

GOVERNMENT WASTE – INTEL, DEI and Research

Posted on by Helena

The US has 18 different Intel agencies.  The US also funds private NGO intel.  All are within the ‘oversight’ of IC Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Accessibility (DEIA).   The U.S. intelligence budget has two major components: the National Intelligence Program and the Military Intelligence Program.  The combined budget is $106.3 billion.   Russia has three intel agencies.

According to the Wilson Center, Russia’s military budget is $81.7 billion – which they call ‘unprecedented’… Unfortunately, they don’t really know what the true spending and budget are given Russia does not publish this information and our 18 intel agencies can’t figure it out.   But like a good neighbor – they ‘guess’.  So, to help out these 18 Federal intel agencies and all the NGO’s taxpayers pay for, Reuters provided the information via a one page classified document?  I seriously doubt it.

The National Intelligence agency’s DEIA Director is Stephanie La Rue who previously worked as a lawyer for the CIA where she received an award – Equal Employment Opportunity and Diversity Award for Exceptional Service.  Every department within the federal government now has their own DEIA agency and allocated Budget.  Yet Russia manages without any.

DEI required training before it could be implemented across the various departments – the cost – unknown.  The HHS alone spends nearly $40 million per year on their DEI program which funds 294 employees.   Color is the point. 

The Federal Government now publishes an annual report on the demographics of its employees;  18.2% black, 9.53% Hispanic, and 6.5% Asian.   Federal workers with ‘targeted disabilities’ – which include blindness, deafness, partial or complete paralysis, missing extremities, dwarfism, autism and epilepsy – accounted for 2.5% of the total workforce in 2021.  Equitable healthcare coverage is available for the LGBT community.

ALL these expenses are paid for by Taxpayers. 

Musk has been tweeting about some of the experimental funding in NIH such as trying to figure out why monkey’s throw their poop, or can monkey’s be trained to play poker, or can we transgender monkeys…  He has declared that he will create a Leader Board for all the agencies and their funding waste.  Transparency.  In real time.   Russia doesn’t use animals for testing except in makeup products.  How much of the US funding could be diverted to SS and Medicare?  NIH Budget = $50 billion.

But NIH is not the only funded research facility, 1,000 Universities have R&D expenditures of which 55% is paid for by Taxpayers = $100 billion.  What is the research?  Genetically modifying food, health and medicine, lithium batteries, and research on ‘Troops’…

For Example:  Johns Hopkins receives the most government funding for Research.   They spend it to ‘research the opioid epidemic’, for diseases that don’t exist in the US, climate change digital health, AI, and biologic & chemical weapons.  In fact – every university is researching the same fundamental topics while torturing primates which are raised on an island offshore of South Carolina.   Recently 43 lab monkeys escaped from the Alpha Genesis lab which provides the primates for NIH and Universities.  I was rooting for the monkeys.

 When researching diseases, the point is to find a new Pharma Drug that will not cure the infectious disease, but calm it while providing 12 more diseases that you didn’t have but do now.  When researching biologic weapons – it is to use them across a wide range of countries – and blame Russia.  And when researching diseases that don’t exist in the US, the goal is to create a vaccine that will increase mortality.

Yes.  Our government spending could easily be cropped by 75%.  Forcing overpaid DEIA employees to actually work for a living.  With Federal Employees now counting roughly 22 million – the elimination would affect 16.5 million who would need to become productive members of society contributing to SS and Medicare.

FAKE Science – Crisis in Reproducing Conclusions

Posted on by Helena

A Private Foundation that is funding Liberal agenda’s has one such agenda that bears definition:  reproducibility in science.

The Laura and John Arnold Foundation funds research into the reproducibility in sciencewhich is:  “a methodological crisis in science in which scholars have found that the results of many scientific studies are difficult or impossible to replicate or reproduce on subsequent investigation, either by independent researchers or by the original researchers themselves.”

This failure to uphold scientific research and conclusions is apparently massive:

Chemistry – 87%

Biology – 77%

Physics and Engineering – 66%

Earth Sciences – 64%

In medicine 67% of medical researchers admitted to knowing someone who falsified their research.

Forget Fake News, Fake Science is far more pervasive and the consequences more staggering.   This means that the vast majority of all scientific fact cannot be verified as fact at all.  It means that science has evolved into a crystal ball magnitude of false conclusions effecting every aspect of society from basic medicine to sports and exercise, to diet, to psychology and even globalization.  The argument basis doesn’t EXIST.

This further denounces the cause for government sponsored University R&D on behalf of the pharma industry funded by taxpayer dollars!  The fake news is that the research is positive – the real news is the research conclusions may be faked.

Initially the conclusions were founded in psychology research.  Scientists from all over the world were asked to replicate the findings of a psychological conclusion that had been reported in a journal.   Within social studies, the ability to replicate the supposed published results was as low as 23%.  It is believed that authors were biased, careless, sometimes outright fraudulent, and of the belief that their conclusions would simply never be challenged. It was a tick mark for publication.

But this falsification of evidence expanded exponentially into all areas of science. It is believed that the perversity of reward created a decayed research for individual gratification instead of fact.

Today scientists are trying to backtrack on the problem by claiming it is not a crisis but more of a boo-boo.  Afraid of the backlash, they are attempting to redefine ‘replication’.  In addition, the number of studies that are failing in even small batches is highly significant.  One scientist attempted to dissuade the failure rate by stating that not all aspects of a conclusion need to be replicated, and that even if a small percentage can be assured, then the study should be considered in good standing and positive.

But I’m not willing to be only 23% cured… I’m not willing to spend 100% for a 23% conclusion…  If I buy a gallon of milk I don’t want to receive ¼ of a gallon…

It effects cancer research, vaccine research, psychological evaluations, and even global warming…

If a scientific conclusion cannot be replicated then the conclusion cannot be considered a fact, it can be considered a stated theory.   Scientists try to argue that replication is a personal issue with the replicating scientists, and not the conclusion.  But that might also indicate that the vaccine that is produced and manufactured is based on the conclusion of one study of one individual whose biological makeup is specific and not conventional, therefore individual number two would not respond the same way and the vaccine is ineffective on a mass level.

The entire scientific community argument in itself is filled with false and fraudulent convictions that further displaces the concept of fact. Unfortunately, if we call scientific conclusions as theory, it upends any argument affecting health, climate, disease, and psychology – it puts them out of business because they are now simpleton soothsayers.   It opens the doors to massive lawsuits.   And it turns the entire pharma industry upside down.

The ramifications could be a domino effect of such proportions that we have never seen before.  And they have gone into scramble mode to attempt to justify the faked results, the falsified conclusions, and the disproportionately low success rates.