Ukraine Issues Martial Law Over “Russian Aggression”…

Ukraine and Russia don’t get along.  While the media, and Nikki Haley continue the narrative that Russia annexed Crimea, they fail to acknowledge that Russia did so at the behest of an election ‘after’ Ukraine’s government was illegally ousted via a coup, installing Chocolate King, Poroshenko, as their president.  Since then Ukraine’s economy under Poroshenko has tanked, skirmishes have continued, their streets are a mess, mass killings, uproars have erupted in their Parliament wherein fist fights are a regularity, and the country has virtually disintegrated.  However, Biden’s son continues to reap the rewards of the illegally obtained natural gas leases he bought for pennies as a result of the coup under the auspices of a Cyprus company, Burissma Holdings.

So Russia builds a bridge between Crimea and Russia over the Kerch Strait.  The bridge just opened this year and helps bring a needed link for Crimeans.  Because of the animosity between Ukraine and Russia, the bridge, and the strait were temporarily closed to Ukraine, and they cite UN Conventions of Sea Law, Articles 19 and 21 which reference sovereignty and protection within a twelve mile radius.

But Ukraine passed it’s own unilateral law just ‘last month’ expanding the 12 mile radius by an additional 12 miles.

According to Russia, two Ukrainian naval vessels were heading full speed toward the strait and the bridge.  Why? Kiev has provided no explanation other than to say Russia provoked aggression when they fired at Ukraine’s naval vessels.

So let’s look at this in a slightly altered light:  suppose China had naval vessels charging toward the Florida Keys, didn’t answer radio calls, did not ask for permission, and continued unabated.  How would the US respond?

No one was killed. The vessels were deactivated.  And Poroshenko immediately called for Martial Law in Ukraine. Why?  Martial Law provides that the military take immediate control of all government and civilian functions.  Civil law is now defunct.  They claim that Russia firing on their naval vessels constitutes an act of War.

What could possibly provoke such a stupid, if not demonstrative claim?

  1. January next year Ukraine will have a new election cycle.   Poroshenko currently holds 8% of the votes.  The coup in 2014 was designed with the media promulgation that corruption was the causal factor, and Ukraine wanted to show how gloriously trusting and anti-corrupt they were so as to be admitted to the EU.  Instead, corruption ramped up extensively, and the economy blanched.
  2. Poroshenko has extensive holdings in the agriculture market.  Ukraine has ‘black soil’ some of the richest soil on the planet.  Monsanto wanted in on the agriculture, the then president, Yanukovych refused. Enter coup.  Poroschenk makes more money and everyone is happy.  Except, of course, the citizens of Ukraine.  If he loses his presidency, he risks losing his agriculture monopoly.  Poroshenko’s agriculture holdings were scandal in the Panama Paper Caper as it came to light that he had extensive non-transparent Cyprus holdings in Ukraine and Germany.

By creating a fake ‘aggression’, anything Russian, Poroshenko has devised an escape route wherein he intends to involve the EU and the US, similar to the Muslim Brotherhood idiocy of Khashoggi.

Contrived.  Blitzed.

The US odd person outed would seem to be – Nikki Haley.  She is making false statements of the events that occurred.  And she is calling for retribution.  That puts her in the spotlight of possibly being a Soros plug.

The fact that her narrative was immediately picked up and lauded by MSM is revealing, the fact that it was picked up by Breitbart is – concerning.

By installing Martial Law in Ukraine, Poroshenko can extend it in 45 day intervals, including up through the presidential election cycle which is slated to be March 2019.  Invoking war, or attempting to invoke the pretense of war, might nationalize and mobilize some of Kiev’s animosity toward Poroshenko and turn the election – but not without the aid of the media.

Enter my previous article – Integrity Initiative, an NGO based in the UK, whose preemptive purpose is to create fake news in the guise of attacking what they claim to be – fake news, in a spiraled web that circles back to George Soros and The Open Society Foundation.

The current frontrunner in the Ukraine election by a vast majority – 12% vs 8% for Poroscehnko, is Yulia Tymoshenko.

So who could possibly have come up with the scheme to create a media sensation of war provocation?

Khordokovsky.

A billionaire exiled from Russia who hates everything Putin and founder of Open Russia, an NGO that has affiliations with George Soros and whose board has included Henry Kissinger and Jacob Rothschild.

One need only look to the support Nikki Haley is receiving;  Washington Post, New York Times, CNN, … c’mon folks, she is The Swamp. And this is a really idiotic setup promulgated by some very stupid intelligentsia –

The US Agenda in Ukraine and Georgia – Annexation

Ukraine update – US to pay salaries of the new government of Odessa, Ukraine, and is sending California troops to train Odessa police…Whoa there! What?

Mikhail Saakashvili was nominated… appointed – propped as Governor of Odessa by Poroshenko, but because Ukraine is broke, the US is going to pay for the salaries of his newly formed government. Does this make Ukraine a US annexation?

First it is important to note an odd parallel; Saakashvili was formally President of Georgia. He left office prematurely ‘to live abroad’ and faces charges of embezzlement and abuse of power. Ukraine refuses to extradite him. Instead they laud him for his powers of corruption – a good resume for a Governor.

Saakashvili came to power in Georgia as a result of a coup led by him, Burjanadze and Zhavania in 2003. Backed by NATO and the ‘west’, his formal election as President was mired in electoral fraud. Ousted President, Shevardnadze, was considered a risk given he had begun talks with Moscow in a deal to privitize energy pipelines. Fearing a shift, the US State Department funded an NGO, The Liberty Institute, and in coordination with George Soros Open Society Georgia Foundation, backed Saakashvili in a coup for regime change in Georgia. Note: In the early 1990’s, Saakashvili received a fellowship from the US State Department and attended Columbia Law School and George Washington University Law School.

Sponsored by McCain (also a Soros puppet) and his, “bomb everybody” mentality, Saakashvili was the instigator in the waged war against South Ossetia in 2008. And while there is no proof the US was involved in this aggression, the US State Department was well aware that the Georgian President was initiating the attack. While news stations in the US claimed that the aggressor was Russia, Wikileaks has since provided cables and proof that this was manipulated, and the disinformation propaganda was created in order to demonize Russia. In fact, Russia was the reactionary to the aggression and able to bring about a swift end to the tensions within a matter of months. Casualties were minimal by comparison to other coup infractions – such as Ukraine.

But the disinformation leaves a bile taste. Once a lie has been established, it begs all truth. How can we possibly trust in a government that routinely is found to have manipulated information – why can’t our government simply speak with integrity and honor? Perhaps it is because our government is no longer – our government – and is simply a defacto government run by shadows who continually have as their spokesman – Soros.

Apparently, both Georgia and the Ukraine were targets of US regime change in the early 2000’s. Why?

Brief History: Georgia had a period of labeled The Golden Age or Golden Renaissance during the 12th and 13th centuries. Invaded by the Iranians and Turks, it’s economy and history became embroiled in conflict after conflict until 1800 when the then Georgian King, George XII, signed a proclamation incorporating Georgia with the Russian Empire. Russia defeated the Iranian army’s occupation of the capital of Georgia, Tbilisi, in the Russo-Persian War 1804 to 1813. After the Russian Revolution of 1917 (Jewish Bolsheviks vs Emperor Nikolai), Georgia declared independence. But independence meant they were under British rule. In 1921, a communist Bolshevik, Filipp Makharadze, and the Jewish Red Army attacked Georgia and took control.

In April 1991, Georgia was once again independent, but not for long as a coup was orchestrated in December 1991 that launched the country into a bloody civil war.

The Wikileaks cables between the US State Department and Saakashvili after the South Ossetia invasion by Georgia, are eerily similar to the ones between Poroshenko and the US with regard to Ukriane: “President Saakashvili told the Ambassador in a late morning phone call that the Russians are out to take over Georgia and install a new regime.” The report, again, provided no independent verification of this claim.

While the US stood by it’s claim that Russia was the aggressor, the EU analysis came to a rather different conclusion. An investigation headed by a Swiss Diplomat, Heidi Tagliavini, for the Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on the Conflict in Georgia, stated in her report that “None of the explanations given by the Georgian authorities in order to provide some form of legal justification for the attack” were valid. “In particular, there was no massive Russian military invasion under way, which had to be stopped by Georgian military forces,” Tagliavini confirmed. “The shelling of Tskhinvali by the Georgian armed forces during the night of 7 to 8 August 2008 marked the beginning of the large-scale armed conflict in Georgia.”

The purpose of the propaganda? Demonize Russia. Why? Both Ukraine and Georgia have economic importance for the US and it all goes back to oil – and a pipeline that circumvents Russia. The pipeline, operated by BP, runs from the Caspian Sea through Azerbaijan, through Georgia, and Turkey to the Mediterranean. Partners in the pipeline include: Azerbaijan, Turkey, Norway, Japan, Italy, France and – most importantly, the US.

The country that notably has no interest in the pipeline is Georgia despite its strategic importance.

A secondary motive is quite simply the surrounding of Russia with US backed regimes so as to manipulate a World War provoked within a bed of lies.  No one in the US could even find Ukraine or Georgia on a map just a few years ago, now these countries have become central provocateurs on a stage that is rife in corruption, fraud, disinformation and propaganda.