Ukraine and Russia don’t get along. While the media, and Nikki Haley continue the narrative that Russia annexed Crimea, they fail to acknowledge that Russia did so at the behest of an election ‘after’ Ukraine’s government was illegally ousted via a coup, installing Chocolate King, Poroshenko, as their president. Since then Ukraine’s economy under Poroshenko has tanked, skirmishes have continued, their streets are a mess, mass killings, uproars have erupted in their Parliament wherein fist fights are a regularity, and the country has virtually disintegrated. However, Biden’s son continues to reap the rewards of the illegally obtained natural gas leases he bought for pennies as a result of the coup under the auspices of a Cyprus company, Burissma Holdings.
So Russia builds a bridge between Crimea and Russia over the Kerch Strait. The bridge just opened this year and helps bring a needed link for Crimeans. Because of the animosity between Ukraine and Russia, the bridge, and the strait were temporarily closed to Ukraine, and they cite UN Conventions of Sea Law, Articles 19 and 21 which reference sovereignty and protection within a twelve mile radius.
But Ukraine passed it’s own unilateral law just ‘last month’ expanding the 12 mile radius by an additional 12 miles.
According to Russia, two Ukrainian naval vessels were heading full speed toward the strait and the bridge. Why? Kiev has provided no explanation other than to say Russia provoked aggression when they fired at Ukraine’s naval vessels.
So let’s look at this in a slightly altered light: suppose China had naval vessels charging toward the Florida Keys, didn’t answer radio calls, did not ask for permission, and continued unabated. How would the US respond?
No one was killed. The vessels were deactivated. And Poroshenko immediately called for Martial Law in Ukraine. Why? Martial Law provides that the military take immediate control of all government and civilian functions. Civil law is now defunct. They claim that Russia firing on their naval vessels constitutes an act of War.
What could possibly provoke such a stupid, if not demonstrative claim?
- January next year Ukraine will have a new election cycle. Poroshenko currently holds 8% of the votes. The coup in 2014 was designed with the media promulgation that corruption was the causal factor, and Ukraine wanted to show how gloriously trusting and anti-corrupt they were so as to be admitted to the EU. Instead, corruption ramped up extensively, and the economy blanched.
- Poroshenko has extensive holdings in the agriculture market. Ukraine has ‘black soil’ some of the richest soil on the planet. Monsanto wanted in on the agriculture, the then president, Yanukovych refused. Enter coup. Poroschenk makes more money and everyone is happy. Except, of course, the citizens of Ukraine. If he loses his presidency, he risks losing his agriculture monopoly. Poroshenko’s agriculture holdings were scandal in the Panama Paper Caper as it came to light that he had extensive non-transparent Cyprus holdings in Ukraine and Germany.
By creating a fake ‘aggression’, anything Russian, Poroshenko has devised an escape route wherein he intends to involve the EU and the US, similar to the Muslim Brotherhood idiocy of Khashoggi.
The US odd person outed would seem to be – Nikki Haley. She is making false statements of the events that occurred. And she is calling for retribution. That puts her in the spotlight of possibly being a Soros plug.
The fact that her narrative was immediately picked up and lauded by MSM is revealing, the fact that it was picked up by Breitbart is – concerning.
By installing Martial Law in Ukraine, Poroshenko can extend it in 45 day intervals, including up through the presidential election cycle which is slated to be March 2019. Invoking war, or attempting to invoke the pretense of war, might nationalize and mobilize some of Kiev’s animosity toward Poroshenko and turn the election – but not without the aid of the media.
Enter my previous article – Integrity Initiative, an NGO based in the UK, whose preemptive purpose is to create fake news in the guise of attacking what they claim to be – fake news, in a spiraled web that circles back to George Soros and The Open Society Foundation.
The current frontrunner in the Ukraine election by a vast majority – 12% vs 8% for Poroscehnko, is Yulia Tymoshenko.
So who could possibly have come up with the scheme to create a media sensation of war provocation?
A billionaire exiled from Russia who hates everything Putin and founder of Open Russia, an NGO that has affiliations with George Soros and whose board has included Henry Kissinger and Jacob Rothschild.
One need only look to the support Nikki Haley is receiving; Washington Post, New York Times, CNN, … c’mon folks, she is The Swamp. And this is a really idiotic setup promulgated by some very stupid intelligentsia –