Democrats: The New Morality Police

Morality of the Democrats:   Apparently, they envision themselves as moral and ethical gods to be praised and worshiped for their undeniable angelic behavior and character.   Because their slate is clean and shiny, just like The Shining!

First, to answer a viewer’s question, “Why the black Masks at the DNC?”

Black masks are symbolic, of black death, the plague, a super-villain, and evil.   An odd choice for a party decrying their whitey white morality.   But then, who are they really playing to? Not The People, they perform for their Masters.  Because their Masters own them as slaves to power and blackmail.

Another viewer:   “I see President Trump as aligned with Lucifer.”

When asked to explain why, there is only a blank space of white paper. Perhaps he doesn’t like how Trump tweets, or how he looks, or how he stands, or his history with women.   Appearance seems to be a common liberal meme – As though somehow ‘appearance’ drives one’s ability.   But then, that is the mass manipulation perpetrated by the media and Hollywood for decades!   Appearance topped Competence!

The illusion is so great that no one remembers Obama was a coke dealer, Billy was a philanderer, Biden is a thief, and even Reagan was guilty of an affair.   But they ‘looked good’, so their offenses were scraped.

But it doesn’t end there. Christians declare President Trump isn’t ‘Christian enough’.   While they can’t find a past president that would measure up to their critique, the conflation makes them feel – superior.   A handful might claim Reagan, but then Reagan was Hollywood and his personal life was never dissected with the rigor imposed on Trump – or anyone for that matter.

While parlaying the illegal and immoral onstage at the DNC, wearing black death masks, the Democrats are the self described ‘moral police’ – which is oddly compatible with Sharia Law. Or The Puritans.   But hardly indicative of the reality.

Biden is embroiled in a corruption and fraud investigation with regard to his dealings in Ukraine and China.   What better way to secure his presidency than to bring on as VP a person who is so blatantly incompetent, corrupt, and ignorant as Kamala Harris?  Moral Police are abruptly hushed by her past dalliances aka, sleeping her way through politics to achieve her position while benefiting from lavish gifts!

But the Democrat Party is steeped in fabrications of reality.  We hear the Mark Twain quotes over and over again:  

  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them they have been fooled.”
  • There are basically two types of people, those who have accomplished things and those who claim to have accomplished things.”

Within this current political climate, some of us are so puzzled by the lack of rational, the obvious vacancy, and wonder how such a deception can be believed.   The propaganda played by the Media is so filled to the brim like a glutenous snake, it has begun to eat itself.

As O’Reilly used to say, it is all SPIN. A means of creating a false reality by constantly plugging lies until the truth is simply a speck of sand on a beach.   Practiced for hundreds of years, the media gave SPIN a hyper jolt!

Some people are more prone to SPIN than others, and therein is the psychology factor.   How many will cower in fear, and how many will fight.

Democrats have lost every ploy they had against President Trump since 2015.   So now the Epstein crowd is reveling in their new self-proclaimed definition, Morality Police.   Because it elevates them in their own minds.   They have failed miserably and need a booster shot to garner some position in the coming election.

Of course it is a test. A test to determine who and how many can be controlled with propaganda, and who and how many will not succumb.  Can Marxism be disguised as utopia?   Can capitalism be disguised as dystopia?  What will the masses ultimately believe?

Somewhere in the propaganda, people came to judge based on perfection.   President Trump isn’t ‘perfect enough’.   As though that was an achievable criteria.   Yet it is widely used by Christians despite it being the antithesis of Christ’s message. Are you “Christian enough”?

Today we have “Karens”, the women who routinely utilize their version of policing to determine if someone is in violation of mandates – masks.   Self appointed. Egocentric.   Snitches.   We have Hollywood that was created on the back of promiscuity, sex, exploitation, rape, sexual assault, sex favors, lecturing The People about “Morality”.   And neither the Karens nor Hollywood seem to see the hypocrisy.   Because they have a basic need to feel they are doing something of worth given their profession is nothing more than pretense and make believe. The Illusion.   A magic trick.

Narcissism is another common transgression that is hurled at President Trump.   Most often this is launched by other politicians, Media pundits and actors. Unfortunately, these same people seem oblivious to the fact that in order to be an actor, a script reader, a politician, a person thrives on narcissism.   It comes with the position and no one is immune.   But it feels good to shrew the word at others while ignoring self.

In the end, judging President Trump by his ‘appearance’ or his ‘morality’ is so incredibly obtuse it belies the entire notion of a Leader.   What defines a Leader?

While in the world of Church morality is certainly a criteria, in the world of Leadership via government, a leader is one who fights for The People.   As the democrats are embroiled in citywide anarchy and destruction and governors are pillaging in their death marches, these so-called leaders are the true wolves, snakes, and deceivers.   What have they done for – YOU?

Is your life better now that your city is destroyed and taxpayers are faced with $100 billion in destruction? I certainly have no intention in giving these ‘leaders’ one dime.   I don’t care what their ‘appearance’ is, or whether they tweet, I care about the demoralizing anarchy that they have conveyed upon us as a nation.

Are you Moral enough?
Are you Christian enough?

If you say yes – then I counter with:   “Anyone who claims they don’t come from a dysfunctional family is either A) lying, or B) delusional.

We STRIVE for perfection – but we can never achieve it – so why does ‘appearance’, the Hollywood Axiom that defines all people, ignore Anarchy against Reality?   Why is this definition a necessary projection of a President?

Who then is the real wolf?   The Judged or the Judger?

Peace, Truth and The Peacemakers Calling

We are called to be ‘peacemakers’. But what is Peace? How is it defined? Is it the absence of conflict or is it the aggressive actionable stance of creating relationship?

We are all ‘a chip off the block’, fragments of God, with jagged edges and jigsaw puzzle pieces. But when we come together as a family, with mother, father and children, we smooth these edges and become more like God. The pieces fit together to make a larger more whole piece closer, more like, the image of God. When we fragment the family, our edges are sharper, more pronounced, and our piece withers in a kaleidescope of warped imagery.

Peacemakers do not avoid conflict they confront it with love and compassion, they resolve it and use the strength of God to absolve the issue each and every time. To hold it like a knight, not a coward, to seek the truth within the conflict and make it known. This world we live in is an example of what it means to not face the truth, because it is the truth that will create peace. Taking responsibility. Owning what is your sin. Looking at the log that gauges your eye.

The UN was created in 1945 to end conflict and bring peace to the world. But it has failed miserably. In fact, between 1946 and 2013, there were 331 incidences of armed conflict. Why? Because the method, the rationale for prevention is not rooted in the core cause – individual emptiness, a Godlessness that permeates the very heart and soul of humanity. How can we possibly stave off conflict if we don’t address the truth of the cause?

When I Googled, ‘how to achieve peace’, most of the entries were Buddhist in nature and reflected a desire for inner peace. There were a few political adjuncts that claimed peace was achieved through freedom and a barrage of solid rules imposed by government. Other sites stressed ‘the avoidance of war’ as a means of peace. Still another site claimed that satisfying one’s own desires first will ultimately lead to peace with others. YIKES!

But men are flawed, and when they rely on their own person to achieve that which has never been known to mankind, they will fail. Again and again. And yet, we continue to believe that man is the solution. That avoidance is the solution. That independence is the solution. That if we avoid conflict, it will disappear.

Ten thousand years later, it still has not worked. So why do we keep butting our heads against this wall of thorns when it has never worked?

The false premise is that since man is the creator of chaos, man must be the source of peace. From the outside. But it cannot happen when the outside is ruled by pride and arrogance and vengeance and immorality. It simply will not work.

Then of course, there is the step-by-step instructions on how to achieve peace with ‘no compromising’ being fundamental to the doctrine. But ‘no compromising’ begs pride, arrogance, rightness, the moral depravity that creates the conflict in the first place. It is a very naïve approach to a very complicated issue. Recently, my husband invoked the ‘Christians don’t compromise’ doctrine in the midst of a fight. Really? I had to look that one up.

The first problem came up in the definition of compromise. Some believed it to mean ‘caving in’, while others observed that it was a give and take, a leaning in and out. I suppose they are both right in a sense, but circumstances are so diverse and broad, an absolute is definitely NOT the rationale.

Biblically, the phrase, “Christians Don’t compromise”, is addressed in the Bible, but it is in the context of there is no compromise with regard to God. No compromise with regard to the commandments of God. And no compromise with regard to sin. It’s a bit like the statement, “I’m sort of pregnant”. You can’t be in a gray area within these black and whites. But that does not mean that there aren’t vast gray areas of issue to mediate within Christianity that are a product of individual circumstances. So to make the statement in the context of a marriage dispute is somewhat …well, out of context.

My husband attempted to invoke ‘truth’ as his and his alone within the frame of not compromising. Truth belonged to him and no one else.  Uh oh…   And in so doing completely missed the point. There are hard truths, absolute facts, and then there are perspective truths, subject to interpretation. By invoking his truth, he was avoiding conflict (his fallback) by refusing to hear me. In so doing, we had no peace, what we had was a dictatorship rule.

While this earth may never find worldly peace, we are still called to understand that we must try. We are called to try as peacemakers.  Not peace as a form of government rule and protocol and doctrine and punishment and judgment, but peace that is based on the values and morals and integrity and spirituality of God and His Word.

And ultimately, Peace will only be had when we have Truth – not your truth or my truth – but THE Truth.