christians

The Money Lenders – A Biblical Prophesy of Jews

Posted on by Helena

While the UN fumbles around the criminality of Israel, it’s ineptitude advances its inability to represent anything on a Globalist Stage Set.  Visually, an abject failure across the globe – they remind me of the mother who gives her child 20 warnings but never imposes consequences.  Netanyahu has proven the power of the UN is zero.  The Sustainable Agenda has toppled.

EV Battery makers are going bankrupt.  Germany’s Volkswagen is slashing employment as their EV market is collapsing the entire company.  Ford denounced its EV sales as abysmal.  The amount of steel produced by Diesel fuel to erect a single large capacity turbine windmill is1000 tons.   That steel producing fuel is driving the cost and availability of Diesel for truckers.  And the CON that was – is devouring itself.  

While Blinken is at the G7 Ministerial Meeting in New York discussing Ukraine’s fossil fuel needs, Lloyd Austin is in Israel promoting more weapons, more death and a waged forever war similar to Afghanistan.  What is not discussed by these esteemed secular humanoids is that Christians are also being eradicated by Israel. 

In his opening speech, Blinken announces that Russia is weaponizing weather to subjugate Ukraine as winter approaches and blackouts are expected daily.   He directs two solutions – take more power from the EU and more money from Americans.   

HOW DID WE GET HERE:

When the Roman Empire fell and the diaspora of Money Lenders were exiled, the Dark Ages evolved:  A period of economic, intellectual, and cultural decline in Western Europe.   History from the 5th century to the 14th – ‘stalled’.  While recently some scholars contend that the Middle Ages were a great time of prosperity and intellectualism that has been misinterpreted under a ‘value judgement’ interpretation, they assert it was simply a period of “Change”.                       

So why would historians suddenly want to rewrite the Dark Ages as a time of great evolution?  

Because the Money Lending Jews dominated the usury.  Credit was based on a persons character.  The farmers were one of the heaviest debtors whose crop yield became the loan collateral.  And history is about repeating itself in endless cycles.

Edward Longshankes, King of England from 1272 to 1307 was an invader, a colonizer, a hawk.   In his conquests, he lauded over the destruction and chaos he left behind.   As a result of his warring mentality, Edward managed to find himself and England indebted to the money-lending Jews asking usury rates.  Robber barons, Edward was not too keen on the arrangement which resulted in the expulsion of all Jews in 1290. 

Kings had a couple of options when on a quest for funds.  One, he can tax his people.  Edward certainly did that.  Two, he can confiscate funds from those over whom he wields power.   Edward relied on the third method, money lending.

In the Middle Ages, a number of money lending options were open to him.  He borrowed from the Jews in England until he took all their money and expelled them from England.  Christians were forbidden to lend money, so he turned to the Italian banking families:

“When the Jews money was already used, the power vacuums turned to the Italians from Lombardy.  They also managed to get around the church’s edict against interest. They did not make loans and charge interest but bought and sold bills of exchange payable in foreign currency. They were, therefore, merchants in banking who hoped by the difference in exchange to make a profit equal to the interest rate they would have charged for a loan.”

This is how the merger of the Roman (Jew) Money-Lenders ultimately merged with the Italian monarchs, the Popes, and the Wealthy.  They merged as sovereign Cartels and thus the global Banking Cartel was formed.  The Italian money lenders owned the Popes and the Jews owned the Kings.  Usury was forbidden in Islamic and Christian Law.

What caused the END to the Dark Ages and the exile of ‘Jews”?  

The Ottoman Empire was formed as a result of the conquest of Constantinople in 1453 bringing an end to the Byzantine Empire.  Wars were fought and money was needed to support the wars.  Money Lenders began to gain traction again coming from Jews and wealthy Italian families such as the Albertis, Corpi, Lorando, etc…  The Ottomans and the Venetians rose to prominence which led to the rise of the Renaissance Period.   The largess wars of this period being the Italian Wars – via the Italian Money Lenders.

The Renaissance was a new age that was inspired by Classical learning. It was marked by the breakup of feudal structures, the rise of city-states, and the emergence of national monarchies.

The Ottoman Empire, was actually an amalgamation of various ethnicities including:  Turks, Arabs, Kurds, Greeks, Armenians, and Christians.  Long depicted as simply Islamic – this Empire was diverse and embraced sovereign religions within their territory recognizing that each race, each faith was to each.   Lasting over 600 years – this period in history was the true time of artistic expression, as well as political and economic security until WWI.

The Money Lenders became political and social authorities and financed military coups.  The Jewish money lenders moved into the Ottoman Empire while Italians financed the Italian Wars.  Enter – The British Empire in the 18th and 19th centuries.  

Avrom Camondo was a Jewish banker industrialist who moved to the Ottoman Empire as it had become the center of trade.  He quickly became known the Rothschild of The East.  When he died, the British Rothschilds quickly moved into the Ottoman Empire collapsing its economy into bankruptcy splitting the spoils of land, art, and jewels. 

What disabled the Ottoman Empire is European desire for colonization and the bankers who financed them.  Colonies acquired through coercive coups at the behest of Britain and France.   Which was parallel to the rise of the new Money Lenders – The Rothschilds.

The Ottomans sought to create a statehood of different races and ethnicities which would survive in a unified and sovereign manner.   This unity meant the Money Lenders couldn’t wage war.   Destroying the Empire they attempted to create a different unity – the EU under the guidance of Soros.  But Money Lenders needed to be fed.  They needed to recreate the vast war mentality of the Dark Ages and beyond.  The Wars that made them wealthy beyond Kings. 

This united front of Christians and Arabs is what the Jews fear most.  It explains 9-11.  It explains the creation of a common enemy.  It explains why Ukraine and Israel will NOT stop.  And it explains how Africa was colonized by Europe and America to become another ground zero of endless wars and the eradication of industrialization and growth. 

The Concept is built on destroying civilizations thru insurmountable DEBT.   

It explains WHY Netanyahu needs to continue his crusade against Muslims –  and Ukraine needs to continue its ravaging of itself for the treasures that its Money Lenders will reap – which is literally Taxpayer Money without Taxpayer Ownership.

While the origin of the Romans has never been revealed, with only vague and cryptic explanations – including mythology, the answer has always been available – The Bible tells us they are not Semites, and they must be expelled as Jesus did in the Temple.  And this is only possible thru a United Front.

Democrats: The New Morality Police

Posted on by Helena

Morality of the Democrats:   Apparently, they envision themselves as moral and ethical gods to be praised and worshiped for their undeniable angelic behavior and character.   Because their slate is clean and shiny, just like The Shining!

First, to answer a viewer’s question, “Why the black Masks at the DNC?”

Black masks are symbolic, of black death, the plague, a super-villain, and evil.   An odd choice for a party decrying their whitey white morality.   But then, who are they really playing to? Not The People, they perform for their Masters.  Because their Masters own them as slaves to power and blackmail.

Another viewer:   “I see President Trump as aligned with Lucifer.”

When asked to explain why, there is only a blank space of white paper. Perhaps he doesn’t like how Trump tweets, or how he looks, or how he stands, or his history with women.   Appearance seems to be a common liberal meme – As though somehow ‘appearance’ drives one’s ability.   But then, that is the mass manipulation perpetrated by the media and Hollywood for decades!   Appearance topped Competence!

The illusion is so great that no one remembers Obama was a coke dealer, Billy was a philanderer, Biden is a thief, and even Reagan was guilty of an affair.   But they ‘looked good’, so their offenses were scraped.

But it doesn’t end there. Christians declare President Trump isn’t ‘Christian enough’.   While they can’t find a past president that would measure up to their critique, the conflation makes them feel – superior.   A handful might claim Reagan, but then Reagan was Hollywood and his personal life was never dissected with the rigor imposed on Trump – or anyone for that matter.

While parlaying the illegal and immoral onstage at the DNC, wearing black death masks, the Democrats are the self described ‘moral police’ – which is oddly compatible with Sharia Law. Or The Puritans.   But hardly indicative of the reality.

Biden is embroiled in a corruption and fraud investigation with regard to his dealings in Ukraine and China.   What better way to secure his presidency than to bring on as VP a person who is so blatantly incompetent, corrupt, and ignorant as Kamala Harris?  Moral Police are abruptly hushed by her past dalliances aka, sleeping her way through politics to achieve her position while benefiting from lavish gifts!

But the Democrat Party is steeped in fabrications of reality.  We hear the Mark Twain quotes over and over again:  

  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them they have been fooled.”
  • There are basically two types of people, those who have accomplished things and those who claim to have accomplished things.”

Within this current political climate, some of us are so puzzled by the lack of rational, the obvious vacancy, and wonder how such a deception can be believed.   The propaganda played by the Media is so filled to the brim like a glutenous snake, it has begun to eat itself.

As O’Reilly used to say, it is all SPIN. A means of creating a false reality by constantly plugging lies until the truth is simply a speck of sand on a beach.   Practiced for hundreds of years, the media gave SPIN a hyper jolt!

Some people are more prone to SPIN than others, and therein is the psychology factor.   How many will cower in fear, and how many will fight.

Democrats have lost every ploy they had against President Trump since 2015.   So now the Epstein crowd is reveling in their new self-proclaimed definition, Morality Police.   Because it elevates them in their own minds.   They have failed miserably and need a booster shot to garner some position in the coming election.

Of course it is a test. A test to determine who and how many can be controlled with propaganda, and who and how many will not succumb.  Can Marxism be disguised as utopia?   Can capitalism be disguised as dystopia?  What will the masses ultimately believe?

Somewhere in the propaganda, people came to judge based on perfection.   President Trump isn’t ‘perfect enough’.   As though that was an achievable criteria.   Yet it is widely used by Christians despite it being the antithesis of Christ’s message. Are you “Christian enough”?

Today we have “Karens”, the women who routinely utilize their version of policing to determine if someone is in violation of mandates – masks.   Self appointed. Egocentric.   Snitches.   We have Hollywood that was created on the back of promiscuity, sex, exploitation, rape, sexual assault, sex favors, lecturing The People about “Morality”.   And neither the Karens nor Hollywood seem to see the hypocrisy.   Because they have a basic need to feel they are doing something of worth given their profession is nothing more than pretense and make believe. The Illusion.   A magic trick.

Narcissism is another common transgression that is hurled at President Trump.   Most often this is launched by other politicians, Media pundits and actors. Unfortunately, these same people seem oblivious to the fact that in order to be an actor, a script reader, a politician, a person thrives on narcissism.   It comes with the position and no one is immune.   But it feels good to shrew the word at others while ignoring self.

In the end, judging President Trump by his ‘appearance’ or his ‘morality’ is so incredibly obtuse it belies the entire notion of a Leader.   What defines a Leader?

While in the world of Church morality is certainly a criteria, in the world of Leadership via government, a leader is one who fights for The People.   As the democrats are embroiled in citywide anarchy and destruction and governors are pillaging in their death marches, these so-called leaders are the true wolves, snakes, and deceivers.   What have they done for – YOU?

Is your life better now that your city is destroyed and taxpayers are faced with $100 billion in destruction? I certainly have no intention in giving these ‘leaders’ one dime.   I don’t care what their ‘appearance’ is, or whether they tweet, I care about the demoralizing anarchy that they have conveyed upon us as a nation.

Are you Moral enough?
Are you Christian enough?

If you say yes – then I counter with:   “Anyone who claims they don’t come from a dysfunctional family is either A) lying, or B) delusional.

We STRIVE for perfection – but we can never achieve it – so why does ‘appearance’, the Hollywood Axiom that defines all people, ignore Anarchy against Reality?   Why is this definition a necessary projection of a President?

Who then is the real wolf?   The Judged or the Judger?

Peace, Truth and The Peacemakers Calling

Posted on by Helena

We are called to be ‘peacemakers’. But what is Peace? How is it defined? Is it the absence of conflict or is it the aggressive actionable stance of creating relationship?

We are all ‘a chip off the block’, fragments of God, with jagged edges and jigsaw puzzle pieces. But when we come together as a family, with mother, father and children, we smooth these edges and become more like God. The pieces fit together to make a larger more whole piece closer, more like, the image of God. When we fragment the family, our edges are sharper, more pronounced, and our piece withers in a kaleidescope of warped imagery.

Peacemakers do not avoid conflict they confront it with love and compassion, they resolve it and use the strength of God to absolve the issue each and every time. To hold it like a knight, not a coward, to seek the truth within the conflict and make it known. This world we live in is an example of what it means to not face the truth, because it is the truth that will create peace. Taking responsibility. Owning what is your sin. Looking at the log that gauges your eye.

The UN was created in 1945 to end conflict and bring peace to the world. But it has failed miserably. In fact, between 1946 and 2013, there were 331 incidences of armed conflict. Why? Because the method, the rationale for prevention is not rooted in the core cause – individual emptiness, a Godlessness that permeates the very heart and soul of humanity. How can we possibly stave off conflict if we don’t address the truth of the cause?

When I Googled, ‘how to achieve peace’, most of the entries were Buddhist in nature and reflected a desire for inner peace. There were a few political adjuncts that claimed peace was achieved through freedom and a barrage of solid rules imposed by government. Other sites stressed ‘the avoidance of war’ as a means of peace. Still another site claimed that satisfying one’s own desires first will ultimately lead to peace with others. YIKES!

But men are flawed, and when they rely on their own person to achieve that which has never been known to mankind, they will fail. Again and again. And yet, we continue to believe that man is the solution. That avoidance is the solution. That independence is the solution. That if we avoid conflict, it will disappear.

Ten thousand years later, it still has not worked. So why do we keep butting our heads against this wall of thorns when it has never worked?

The false premise is that since man is the creator of chaos, man must be the source of peace. From the outside. But it cannot happen when the outside is ruled by pride and arrogance and vengeance and immorality. It simply will not work.

Then of course, there is the step-by-step instructions on how to achieve peace with ‘no compromising’ being fundamental to the doctrine. But ‘no compromising’ begs pride, arrogance, rightness, the moral depravity that creates the conflict in the first place. It is a very naïve approach to a very complicated issue. Recently, my husband invoked the ‘Christians don’t compromise’ doctrine in the midst of a fight. Really? I had to look that one up.

The first problem came up in the definition of compromise. Some believed it to mean ‘caving in’, while others observed that it was a give and take, a leaning in and out. I suppose they are both right in a sense, but circumstances are so diverse and broad, an absolute is definitely NOT the rationale.

Biblically, the phrase, “Christians Don’t compromise”, is addressed in the Bible, but it is in the context of there is no compromise with regard to God. No compromise with regard to the commandments of God. And no compromise with regard to sin. It’s a bit like the statement, “I’m sort of pregnant”. You can’t be in a gray area within these black and whites. But that does not mean that there aren’t vast gray areas of issue to mediate within Christianity that are a product of individual circumstances. So to make the statement in the context of a marriage dispute is somewhat …well, out of context.

My husband attempted to invoke ‘truth’ as his and his alone within the frame of not compromising. Truth belonged to him and no one else.  Uh oh…   And in so doing completely missed the point. There are hard truths, absolute facts, and then there are perspective truths, subject to interpretation. By invoking his truth, he was avoiding conflict (his fallback) by refusing to hear me. In so doing, we had no peace, what we had was a dictatorship rule.

While this earth may never find worldly peace, we are still called to understand that we must try. We are called to try as peacemakers.  Not peace as a form of government rule and protocol and doctrine and punishment and judgment, but peace that is based on the values and morals and integrity and spirituality of God and His Word.

And ultimately, Peace will only be had when we have Truth – not your truth or my truth – but THE Truth.