Once again the Agenda has been revealed, just not in the format they attempt to redefine. Deutsche Welle has declared that the switch to Green is a $50 trillion investment opportunity!! Reading thru the disinformation jargon, that reaping of indescribable wealth opportunity would seem to have very specific investors in mind to secure the benefits and very specific citizens paying for those investments. It is a ‘redistribution of wealth’ just not in the manner they proclaim!
At DAVOS, ‘business leaders and politicians’ drooled over the potential to charge the public at large via taxes to pay for the RESET so that eventually private citizens would be ‘encouraged’ to join in just in time to reap the rewards. That end date? 2030. How delightful!
The argument that is released to the media for public consumption is that shareholder capitalism shovels money to its shareholders and its executives at the expense of customers, employees, the environment, and society as a whole. And that this is a failed system.
Moving away from ‘shareholder capitalism’ would seem to secure that the peasants would never be able to share in the generated wealth. Shareholder capitalism is when a corporation bases its decisions on the shareholders that support the corporate system. Thus the market determines shareholder wealth. It is what markets are all about. Markets are a means for shareholders to generate profits, wealth, and retirement funds.
By contrast, Deutsche Welle reveals that the discussions at DAVOS were about how to eliminate that potential given the $50 trillion in profits this RESET could generate and how best to control who gets that profit. Stakeholders. In a stakeholder scenario, the ‘feed’ is that the profits would be shared amongst employees, customers and suppliers. In 2019, over 200 CEO’s of the largest corporations as well as the Business Roundtable advocated for this more equitable distribution of the $50 trillion on the table.
The reality is quite different – and I own a bridge in NY I can sell you for $10 billion.
The concept was first resented by Adolf Berle in his manifesto, “The Modern Corporation and Private Property” which he co-wrote in 1932. The basis of the concept is – Corporate Governance. And of course, corporations drooled, lavished and literally foamed at the mouth over the idea. But actually instituting it would take a century to complete. Berle was instrumental in implementing Johnson’s Great Society.
Berle is defined as the father of “Corporate Liberalism”. “Corporate liberalism is a tool for open door imperialism in which the corporate elite become “both the chief beneficiaries of and the chief lobbyists for the supposedly anti-business regulations”. The idea is that both owners of corporations as well as high up government officials come together to become the class of elites. The elite class then conspires to keep power away from the low or middle class. Presumably, to avoid the risk of revolution from the poor and powerless and to avoid the realization of class conflict the elite have the working class pick sides in a mock conflict between business and state.”
This strategy of course is the basis of Agenda 2030 wherein the profits from the RESET begin to flow. As Kerry keeps pronouncing, “We only have nine years!” It has nothing to do with climate catastrophe – and everything to do with fully implementing this Agenda of Corporate Liberalism by 2030 – 9 years from now.
Technically, it would appear their planners have screwed up a bit. If they intend for the plebes at large to pay for this through tax dollars, they need to have readily available jobs to tax. While eliminating the elderly who are nonproductive citizens via a virus does fit, the forced lockdowns and the destruction of the economy are contrary to their agenda. At least in the present sense.
Timing is everything. Installing the means to create this new environment requires a very specific timetable. You can’t eliminate the stock markets until you have sucked them dry. You can’t eliminate jobs when you need tax revenue. And you can’t reduce the population into chaos until you are within the ‘profit point’ of your RESET.
As such, it would appear they have mucked it all up! And are now likely desperate to get back on track. Biden was the means as he represented everything they required to institute their ‘doublespeak’. A puppet whose mind had completely collapsed and so serve as a dehumanized robot.
In 1961 Erich Fromm wrote an Afterward for George Orwell’s book ‘1984’. In his summary he emphasizes the power of illusion. “The basic question which Orwell raises is whether there is any such thing as ‘truth’. “Reality”, so the ruling Party holds, is not external. Reality exists in the human mind and nowhere else… whatever the Party holds to be truth – is truth.” … “To them, power is not a ‘means’, it is an end. And power means the capacity to inflict unlimited pain and suffering to another human being. Power then, creates reality and truth.”
In this RESET, there is no judicial law, there is only control. There is no morality, because morality is born of humanism, or a heart – and as man is dehumanized, he no longer adheres to any conceptualizations of individuality, spirit and freedom. What Fromm refers to as a negative utopia. For it is utopia for the power elite – just not for anyone else.
While the recent Reddit fiasco proves that our stock markets are entirely rigged, the revelation is far from new. In the 1980’s penny stocks were the bonanza for corruption. New Issues, manipulated pricing, bought stockbrokers, and corrupt traders were the mainstay. These firms were systematically shuttered by the SEC with a number of traders and owners going to jail. But they revealed what many already knew – fraud was easy and prolific.
DAVOS attempts to doublethink us into believing that their RESET is about creating a utopian world when in fact it is a ‘negative utopia’ embracing hopelessness and despair born within a veil of constant fear.
Pelosi is now building a wall around the US Capitol creating a barrier of elitism. Biden will continue issuing EO’s for his first 100 days. During this time, it is likely the US Constitution will be completely obliterated. LAW will be a determination of the corporate governance board, and our willingness to fight will be tested like no other time in history.
According to Kerry, we have nine years to destroy this evil.
The power to fight lies in freedom – critical thinking – hope – individuality – and love.
Most people and investors want to believe that Joey and the Dem party is a remake of Obama 2.0. Most investors are driven exclusively buy their desire to make profits and to satisfy their egos. They believe that life will go on as it has and that 10, 20, 30 years from now things will not be much different than they are now. Few believe that there is any real danger lurking because it seems mostly like some conspiracy theory supported by extremists. After watching many videos from a variety of non main street media people, I am convinced otherwise.
To some extent, the markets have always been rigged because Wall Street profits always come first and are provided by slick marketing and even some slight of hand that entices millions of people to trade and invest and thus provide the profits for Wall Street in numerous ways. I view stakeholders as sort of like founders of a company and shareholders as buyers of stock. I wonder what Wall Street will be like without any rule of law and how stock values would be maintained without it.
Perhaps there will be a super crash in confidence that will leave stocks decimated and the billionaires will lose much of their wealth. It is hard to see how wealth will be maintained for the “stakeholders” and no one else. The main reason the stakeholders are so wealthy is because millions of people buy into their companies by purchasing stock and this demand drives up prices.
It seems hard to believe in “stakeholder” capitalism, especially since the world’s richest man doesn’t want mail-in ballots used for a vote to unionize his flagship company. Richest man in the world? Employees want to unionize to get higher wages and better benefits (you’ll have to show your ID for that vote)? Doesn’t sound like “stakeholder” capitalism to me.
But it does. Doublespeak is the terminology in 1984 – it references to holding two contradictory beliefs simultaneously and accepting them both. It is conscious and unconscious and illustrates the entire concept of illusion.
Stakeholder is not ‘capitalism’ – it is corporate governance. But you can see for yourself by reading the economic forum at DAVOS – and reading the DW.com article for yourself.