Reversing Charitable Tax Status

Censorship by Google and Facebook is now common.  August 2023 RFK Jr. sued Google for censoring his content.  2018, Google launched a censored search engine in China.   YouTube censors right leaning videos.  2010 Google stated that it had received orders to censure content from the ‘authorities’ including; Canada, US, Thailand, Spain, and Germany.  Interestingly, the Washington Post and New York Times, as CIA draft liberal media spinners, also claim Google is illegally censoring.  

Google claims that it provides “Transparency Reports” to show exactly who they censor and why.   Oddly the last update was June 2022.

The First Amendment – Freedom of Speech Law refers to government censorship.   Clearly, both Twitter and Google have been subjected to government censorship.   Yet, government courts continually reject the claim and any lawsuits.

A little known outlet, Ad Fontes Media, formed in Colorado in 2019 has released a media bias chart.  The chart claims to rank media outlets based on left lean, right lean and middle.  In addition, it provides a ranking for reliability and value.  It was created by Vanessa Otero, a registered Democrat.

While claiming to work with all sides of the media spectrum, Ad Fontes Partners include META & Newsela among others.   Newsela Partners include WAPO, NYT, AP, The Economist, Soros, Al Jazeera, and Bloomberg – among others.   All middle ground highly unbiased according to Ad Fontes – including our beloved CNN!     The results were tabulated by their partner Comscore via an online survey.  Comscore founders, Magid Abraham & Giani Fulgoni, are both World Economic Forum Pioneers.

Incredibly UNBIASED…

These are the censors – the media bias analysts and ‘watchdogs looking forward to the government council which will determine what news is allowed.   Technically, everyone is biased.   It is why we have two parties – bias.   It is why we have alternate media to the bias of the liberal media.   Bias is inherent in everything and everyone.   The Civil War was about bias.   Attempting to censor bias is mandated by the World Economic Forum so as to turn the masses into one big slavery package.

In the US Constitution the First Amendment protects “Freedom of Speech”.   With caveats.   It only applies to the prohibition of the government initiating the censorship.

The Supreme Court has added caveats including defamation.  “False information that harms the reputation of a person or business”.   A bias pyramid would fall under this caveat.   By using a comparative, Ad Fontes has sullied the reputation of those on the rungs below a linear CNN, BBC, NPR etc.. as of better quality.   An individual could be seen to have an opinion, but the pyramid presented does not suggest ‘opinion’, it suggests a Truth Bomb.   And now comes under the heading of libel for publishing this as Fact.

In the case of Twitter, it was clearly shown by Elon Musk and Jack Dorsey that the CIA was heavily involved in the censorship.   Yet the US government, our Congress, took no action.   Why?   Because the CIA/FBI have a file on ‘everyone’.   Quite literally.   And the vast majority of Congress, whether right or left, are owned by the CIA.

What happens when the government doesn’t exist?   The Constitution is no longer valid.   In a world of NGO Stakeholders, censorship is legal.   A Stakeholder ‘government’ is the goal of The World Economic Forum.   The same Forum that is creating fake pyramids of left and right bias.

The world of censorship has been hijacked.  

Protecting children from books deemed inappropriate is a meandering line.   To Kill A Mockingbird is banned because it is classified as racist – yet libraries brimming with transexual and homosexual depictions is considered protected speech for elementary children.   Until this is addressed by the Supreme Court and /or an Amendment to the Constitution clarifies this, the NGO’s and Stakeholders will continue their arbitrary classifications.

The fastest way to topple the vast majority of NGO’s is to eliminate the Charitable Status completely.   And yes, that would have to apply to churches, otherwise every NGO would claim they were a church…   The 16th Amendment gave Congress the Power to Tax.   It was led by democrats and ‘progressive republicans (rhinos).   The Revenue Act of 1917 gave individuals the ability to make charitable contributions a deduction.  The first NGO was the UN.

The difference between an NGO and a charity is that an NGO can make a profit.   In addition, despite its nongovernmental status, an NGO can get its funding from governments.   Diluting the entire means of charity or charitable deduction.  The Revenue Act of 1954, signed under Eisenhower, began the deluge of NGO’s.  It established a wealth maker by creating a false charitable definition and allowing profits to be untaxed.

Because the entire point of a charity vs a corporation is one entity is supposed to have No Profit to tax – because as a charity you give it all away…

SOROS Demands European Redistribution of Wealth

Oxfam, the Soros Open Society NGO, is demanding that Europe divest itself of its wealth in favor of the impoverished refugees. Oxfam is appealing to the UN that Europe be forced to accept hundreds of thousands of more refugees so as to change the face of Europe and create a ‘mini-me’ Middle East. They have stated that it is not fair to subject the poorer Middle Eastern nations with these refugees – as in poor Saudi Arabia and Qatar and Oman and Kuwait. Poor countries that post the highest gdp per capita in the world…

NGO’s have risen in recent years to exert control over governments and countries. Their power is massive and they have infiltrated every country on this globe. The number of NGO’s in the US now tops over 1.5 million. They employee hundreds of thousands and their executives enjoy top salaries despite their ‘charitable’ status.

The first NGO ever created was – the UN in 1945. The stated purpose was to be independent of government control… Obviously that definition was loosely applied given most of the heavy weight NGO’s are actually funded by the government they are ‘independent of’. Given that the affiliations have become so politically motivated, a number of acronyms have joined the bandwagon: GONGO – Government operated NGO, BINGO – Business friendly international NGO, there is MANGO, QUANGO, DONGO, the list goes on and reads like a video game.

Like the UN, the NGO’s have slowly garnered more and more power to make decisions for us using their ‘charitable’ influence on other organizations making decisions for us – as in the UN. Governments have become the pawns of these organizations and our tax dollars a partial source of their revenue. While the point of NGO’s is to be non-political, to be independent, to be neutral, that would seem to be hypocritical given their donor base always has an agenda.

The Open Society alone operates in 37 different countries. Founded in Hungary in 1984, it merged with an affiliate of the Congress for Cultural Freedom in 1991. The Congress for Cultural Freedom was established by the CIA and was active in 35 countries. The CCF was founded in west Berlin in 1950 to counter communism although some of its members actually embraced the philosophy. It was considered a left wing movement attracting radical ideologies including Marxism and existentialism.

One of the CCF members, Franz Borkenau, predicted in January 1953 that Stalin would die. In fact he did die in March 1953 and evidence that he may have been poisoned has surfaced recently. It also included Arthur Schlesinger Jr who worked for the precursor to the CIA, Office of Strategic Services, during WWII. One its founders, Sidney Hook, was initially a Marxist who advocated for Communism became disenchanted with Stalin, and ultimately became a democratic socialist and a signatory of the Humanist Manifesto II which advocated for among other things – an atheist society. Among the concepts of the Manifesto, it is written:

 “I am convinced that the battle for humankind’s future must be waged and won in the public school classroom by teachers that correctly perceive their role as proselytizers of a new faith: a religion of humanity that recognizes and respects the spark of what theologians call divinity in every human being…The classroom must and will become an arena of conflict between the old and new — the rotting corpse of Christianity, together with all its adjacent evils and misery, and the new faith of humanism, resplendent with the promise of a world in which the never-realized Christian ideal of ‘love thy neighbor’ will finally be achieved.” 

Humanism has been active for centuries and while it’s definition has altered significantly over time, the basis of its thought now is rooted in ‘self’.

This drive toward self has been the forefront of the Soros agenda, because when self is the deity, self can be manipulated, controlled, and pleasured into submission.

Who were the CIA Directors when CCF was created until it merged with Soros?

1950-1953 Walter Bedell Smith

1953-1961 Allen Dulles

1961-1965 John McCone

1965-1966 William Raborn

1966-1973 Richard Helms

1973 James Schlesinger

Walter Smith was credited with re-organizing the CIA, redefining its structure and its mission according to a report criticizing the past CIA co-written by Allen Dulles – who later became a CIA Director. It was during this timeframe that the CIA began using Foundations as pass-thru sources of covert funds, including the Ford Foundation and later the Kaplan foundation, both of which funnel money to The Council on Foreign Relations. These same Foundations direct money toward public broadcasting institutions, driving propaganda and delegating news.

NPR has a large swathe of revenue granted from the Schumann Foundation for which Bill Moyers is acting president. Bill Moyers – journalist – former Director of The Council on Foreign Relations. He was also on the Board of Directors for George Soros, Open Society Foundation.

These are the tightly woven threads that rule without having to answer to The People – ever.

Oxfam. Reportedly has been linked to the British government’s M16. They claim to be dedicated to the redistribution of wealth which certainly would be the result of their demand for more and more poverty stricken refugee immigrants arriving in Europe.

For an organization to advocate against the wealthy, their 2013 990 for just the American branch reported total income of over $89 million and total assets of $78 million. Total grants accounted for about $24 million or roughly 27%. Not terribly charitable of them…

Both the UK CEO, Mark Goldring, and Deputy Chief Executive for Oxfam came from VSO, a UK “government funded organization”. Given Mark Goldring’s salary, benefits and deferred salary which is well over 500,000 Euro – he is well into the 1% wealth category that Oxfam mocks and decries as foul…

oops.