donald trump

Erika Kirk And Her Sacrificial Lamb, Tyler Robinson

Posted on by Helena

The Charlie Kirk Assassination Hearing is over and Erika Kirk immediately shifted from grieving widow to a Soviet Bolshevik as she paced the TPUSA stage and gave a motivational speech worthy of a dopple-spiegel aka, a double sided vanity mirror. Leaving behind the leather pants, five diamond rings and fireworks – she came as a comrade in full regalia.  Loaded down with pauses and forgotten words, her words will live in infamy – except no one really understands the implication …

“I would much rather our country look like this room than the inside of that courtroom”. End speech – raucous applause.

 The interpretations were all over the place – with no one giving a positive impression:  “She’d rather be in a room full of people who buy her story than a room full of people trying to find the truth about what happened to Charlie.”  “Psychologists and sociologists most commonly refer to this as coercive persuasion or thought reform (commonly known as “brainwashing”. “She just babbles. That’s all she does. Nothing she says has any actual meaning, it’s just a bunch of words put together to make her sound like she’s smart or capable.”

Kamala Harris comes to mind.  Say nothing but channel your best impression of Peter Sellers in the movie, ‘Being There’.  Unfortunately, she also broke the law while speaking at the TPUSA event given she breeched a Gag Order ordered by the Trial judge and shamefully declared Tyler Robinson was Charlie’s killer – quite possibly eliminating the potential for a impartial trial at all.

Speculation rises that Robinson may be Epsteined before he stands trial.

Obviously, Israel is attempting to create an “Erika Kirk’ capable of some political office. The Israeli PR continues to backfire.  The sparkle clad Erika Flopped. The blitzy-glitzy stage of fireworks and balloons Failed.  The death eye podcast with the Bolshevik hat – Cringe!  The dabbing eye Debased. Once again, the Mossad does Not understand PR and Erika is no exception to the rule.

The judge will not rule until sometime in September.

From my perspective, just about everything presented by the prosecution is highly circumstantial.  Even the Lance Twiggs interview was marred when the interviewer accidentally used the name Matt instead of Tyler…  All the video footage was blurred. And the ‘bullet fragments’ were unverifiable. The only evidence is seemingly a slew of PR opinions circulating the internet attempting to create illusions – from fog.  How a jury could ever be sequestered is beyond imaginable. Bias grows like algae in the Reflecting Pool.

Erika Kirk’s response to go on a TPUSA blitz tour was done to keep her relevant in the news – every event splashed across headlines, every podcast, every word she has emit – is hyper stylized by The Paid Influencers.  Without realizing they make a trial impossible. Because the bigger trial, the bigger stage is to promote Erika.  The pitiful.

While the media routinely refers to Charlie Kirk’s family as having made demands of the judge, and convicted Tyler Robinson without a trial, Charlie Kirk’s parents have made the statement ‘no comment’.   Thus, when the media references ‘family’ they would refer only to Erika.

NOTEWORTHY:  When Erika is on stage, voicing podcasts, giving advice, there is a cavernous omission – she never quotes The Bible. She never discusses Christ in any context. Almost as though she has never read The Bible.

Odd presence at the hearing included Jack Posobiec and Don Trump, Jr.  Both proceeded to give their opinions publicly that Robinson was the killer and that the evidence presented by the prosecution was sound. Obviously hoping they can sway anyone who still has some issue with the ambiguity and provide the big brother lead.  Interference in a court proceeding comes to mind – especially when said interference comes from the White House. 

Posobiec, aka Jack Bukakeiec (Japanese, although his parents identify as Polish), is an odd character to be sure – his background is rife with discombobulations including; supposed antisemitism and neo-Nazi affiliations. Simultaneously, he was pro Ukraine, traveled with Laura Loomer, served in the naval reserves stationed at Guantanamo and has engaged in plagiarism. While at college he started a Chapter, Students For Academic Freedom, run by David Horrowitz Freedom Watch, an anti-Islam Jewish affiliated NGO.   

Erika Kirk chose media production to promote herself within 5 days of Charlie Kirk being assassinated. A PR disaster that she has expanded with her Mossad handlers writing word salad scripts while promoting lie after lie in order to elevate Erika to a person of power given her new found wealth.  She bears no resemblance to the woman Charlie thought he had married. An incredibly sad tempest for Charlie as truths began to unravel surrounding his ‘friends, associates, financial benefactors’ and ultimately his wife. 

It is questionable whether Erika was a deliberate ‘honey-pot’, but evidence of their last few months would seemingly support that fallout. The fact that Tyler Robinson, aged just 21, would take the Fall for this demonized assassination is levied by Erika, JD Vance, Donald Trump Jr., Israel, along with a host of Trump influencers who promote the death of a Sacrificial Lamb.

Was Lindsey Graham an Israeli warning to Trump? Everyone is a vulnerable target.  Everyone.      

Khizr Khan -A Miserable Con of Saudi Intervention

Posted on by Helena

Khizr Khan came to the US ’empty-handed’ like all immigrants in 1980. And immediately enrolled in a masters program at Harvard where he obtained his law degree…according to most media reports.

Hmmm – REALLY?

While he was born in Pakistan, he was living in the United Arab Emirates before coming to the US at the age of 29. What was he doing in the UAE?   Apparently nothing.  But he did move to the US in 1980 – although he actually was really living in Saudi Arabia…  working in International Trade Law during the 80’s where he was also writing a paper on Wahhabism. Concurrently, he was attending the University of Missouri where he graduated in 1982 with his law degree. How is that possible??  The same Mizzou Law School that was a hotbed of protests and saw the resignation of its President and Chancellor last year.   But how could Khan be going to school in Missouri when he was living in Massachusetts/Maryland – according to his bio? Because his sons were raised in – Maryland.

Discrepancies lay waste to the Truth.

He holds no law license in Maryland, Virginia or DC, (according to his website) but instead states that he is a member of the New York State Bar Association. According to their website – he is not a sustaining member. A search of the New York State registrations shows he was admitted to the Bar in 2010. But his website states that he was practicing law at a ‘major law firm’ from 1998 to 2007 in DC, and then moved to New York in 2007 where he was a Director of Law at a ‘major law firm’ from 2007 to 2010. In addition, he was an adjunct member/professor at Georgetown Law school in 2006… despite the fact that he had never passed the bar anywhere yet!

He has a newly minted website that was created in 2016 thru Godaddy. He claims to be the Founder of ESI Institute New York… but there is no such institute, there is an EDI Institute New York, but it is NOT affiliated with Khan.

His ‘website’ states his office is located at 415 Madison Avenue, 14th Floor, NY. But as of June 2016, a list of tenants does not include his name. Rent in the building starts around $55 sqft per year, and ‘virtual space’ is available on the 14th floor through Regus.

Empty-handed, he managed to put himself through law school and his sons through advanced degree programs, including PhD programs at the University of Virginia. Interesting…  A ‘success’ story the media would have us believe…  Really?   A success in that he was backed by Saudi money!

Electronic Discovery is considered on par with a paralegal, today’s starting salaries range between $69k and $89k. So how did he get thru Harvard? And how did he pay for extensive degrees for his three sons making maybe $50,000 at best twenty years ago?

Tangled Webs.

He holds up what he professes is a Pocket Constitution, but in a screen-grab I could find no book that matched the one he held. Nor was the wording consistent with The Constitution of the United States of America.  Maybe it was in Arabic…

He states that the 14th Amendment guarantees equal protection under the law. But the Amendment has nothing to do with putting a stave on immigration – it has to do with citizens who have been granted citizenship in the US.  Maybe he needs to reread the 14th Amendment…

Making the accusation that Trump is ‘dividing the Muslims’, is like blaming Hillary for Nazi’s… there is no correlation. The division within the Muslims dates back centuries.

While working in Saudi Arabia, he wrote a paper in which he references the contribution to his article by Said Ramadan, a prominent leading figure within the Muslim Brotherhood who died in 1995. The fact that Huma Abedin has been linked to the Muslim Brotherhood would fit that possibly she was the one who rooted out Khan to deliver the scathing DNC address to Trump.

But filling in the inconsistencies to his background was poorly executed.

Still, Hillary calling on this man, Mr. Khan, to ask the GOP representatives to repudiate their candidate was rather out of line, bold, and quite presumptuous, an arrogant request against someone who has had business ties with Middle Eastern countries for years, and only served to want an end to radical Muslims who want to annihilate the US. Technically, the SAME agenda served by his son in Iraq!

Perhaps the Saudi link would make sense though given they are tremendous donors to the Clinton Foundation and tit-for-tat, everything is greased. Even a Manhattan Office. An education at Harvard and the University of Virginia can be greased.

Mr. Khan’s residence would appear to remain in Charlottesville, Virginia, a house and acreage bought in his name in 2010. There is no listing for his residence in New York. Which would explain the ‘virtual office’ and a website dated 2016…

What we don’t know about Khan is a whole lot more than what we do know.  To have such a person making presidential demands is quite disturbing!  To have such a person support a candidate who faces innumerable potential crimes is even more disturbing.

Republican Debate Moderators – Mental Minions

Posted on by Helena

A baby is born innocent. But they are also born demanding, selfish, impatient, unloving, inclined to anger when they don’t get their way, greedy, gluttonous, and consumed with self. Over the years, it is a mother’s job to instill values and to moderate behavior, pulling it back, putting it in its proper place. And when the child ventures into the world on their own, hopefully the mother and father have taught them love, compassion, respect, patience and honor.

The commentators of the debate last night missed those lessons.

Will they be penalized? Will they be lectured for their absolute indecent behavior? Or are they all high fiving it and chugging shots behind the curtain of Oz?

Sometimes people don’t realize that when they slander another person, use bully tactics, and ignore common decency, they become the focus instead of the one they are trying to intimidate. Their behavior is so filled with venom that no matter who they were speaking to, no matter what the other person said, they are now the focus of venom.

John Harwood. Becky Quick. Both heavy duty Clintonites.

The fact that Ben Carson stepped out of the fray was possibly the best and most sane move anyone could have committed given the hatred packed fumes that were expelled from the mouths of babes. While the media is asserting that the Republican candidates are just angry because they were asked tough questions, lets take a look at some of these ‘toughies’:

  1. Should fantasy football be regulated by the government?
  2. Referencing Trump, ‘is this a comic book version of a presidential candidate’?
  3. When Carson stated that he was not affiliated with a company that had illegally placed his picture on their website, the commentator said, ‘doesn’t that speak to your vetting process’?
  4. Rubio was asked about a newspaper’s editorial calling for him to resign
  5. Asking Carson why he serves on the board of Costco which is gay friendly
  6. Asking Trump why he said Facebook founder, Zuckerberg, was wrong about immigration?

How do any of these questions address the economy? They don’t. They were created to slander and denounce the individual. Petty. Stupid.

And if that wasn’t enough, apparently Hillary was busy having her campaign managers text notes to reporters in which she chastised the candidates and their answers. Did Hillary create the questions for the commentators? Or does she just tell the media what to say?

In this topsy turvy world we have made a befuddled mess. We learned nothing from the debate because the questions posed were about nothing and deserved the befuddlement responses. The commentators were harsh, rude and ill-prepared with facts. What they did possess was a true laissez faire attitude that proved beyond a reasonable doubt that they failed to grow beyond the arrogance of a babe at birth. Tch Tch.

Trump Trumps

Posted on by Helena

With 16 GOP candidates all vying for the chance to rule the United States, divvying up the poll becomes a sticker shock of sorts. I mean if all were equal, each would share 6% of the votes. So it is not news that the garbage, rageful, potty-mouth vendetta’s should begin early on as vetting is necessary.

It is also important to consider who the pollsters are in these random tallys. For example; the Quinnepiac University Poll – if you haven’t heard of them, you aren’t alone. But they are declaring themselves to be; highly accurate and the gold standard. Their random sampling is of 1000 age 18 and over registered voters. And despite their claims to fame, they have a scanty record of accuracy. Nonetheless, the media likes polls and so they are often cited…paid to cite.

Trump has shown a breakout in the polls, and the low ballers are miffed taking swipes that do nothing to give integrity to their own failing run. What to do, what to do… In classic style reminiscent of the reality Survivor series, elimination of the competition is top priority. So the GOP is ganging up on Trump for only one purpose, to eliminate the one who has the most points. How righteous… And the Games begin!

The intention is to eliminate as many as possible as quickly as possible so as to confuse the polls and delete what people think or want so that the competition is now among the losers that no one really wanted in the first place but that’s all that is left. It’s the political tact to force voters to choose between two evils, instead of values. I do not qualify as a Trump supporter, I have made no choice as yet, I am merely a bystander watching the melee.

One advantage to Trump is simply his team. They are sharp. They turn every bad press to a press – then to a positive press – it’s a win-win situation and the others are way too over-matched to get it. When the other ‘contestants’ rant, their raves look scary because they were supposed to represent a decorum of sorts. Now, we see their true nutty professor self. And it ain’t pretty.

Graham doing some goofball video about cell phones is a loser rhetoric, he’s already on the defensive and he is hardly addressing anything of importance. Not a good sign. His campaign is ummm, misinformed, I’d garner.

But candidates rely on polls in order to determine which side of an issue they stand. If the poll indicates that the American people don’t care, then the candidate stays on the sidelines. Making no comment, the candidate can then come back later and make a stand if the poll changes.  It’s called hypocrisy and deceit.

On the other side of the equation we have Hillary and Bernie. With Hillary gaffs, Hillary lies, and Hillary coldness, her appeal as a woman is lost. She crosses the line of all ethnicities, religions, nonreligions, class, you name it, she makes people cringe. Martin O’Malley has an uphill battle given the Baltimore debacle of inane leadership, not to mention his bizarre claim that global warming led to the formation of ISIS. I mean, if that were the case, then wouldn’t California be an ISIS haven?

So the dog fight has begun and the mud will be by far the worst in history – that’s a fair bet. It’s the perfect time to go on holiday, to have no access to the squabbles and intense verbiage slinging, it’s a good time to just – go away. We still have nearly 18 more months of this and that would be a long, long holiday…