UN Human Rights Council – or Human Traffickers

The “world” is all in a twitter because the US has dropped out of the UN Human Rights Council – the ship has sailed.  The comments come from interesting sources:   Sweden – whose human rights have spiraled to such an extent that rape, assault, burglary, and murder have qualified them to become a third world country by 2020.  Of course no commentary is ever left unsaid by the UK’s Boris Johnson who just likes to see himself quoted.  The UK Parliamentary has become a crass pit of moral and ethical depravity with screaming, fights, barbs, and sarcastic laughter the new norms.  The English Gentleman is dead.   China says they regret the move. Indonesia has ‘deep’ regret. Of course, the barbs from the UN High Commissioner, Prince Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein, include – snickeringly disappointed but not surprised. 

The Prince himself hails from Jordan where slavery and squalor and over crowded migrant camps house refugees who are given no education, no jobs, no rights.  Jordan, where women are still considered chattel. Jordan, whose human rights are perverted every single day.  Jordan who took in Palestinian refugees between 1947 and 1964 numbering roughly 2 million.  Of those, about 634,000 do not hold Jordanian citizenship and have no rights thereof. Approximately 370,000 still live in the refugee camps – and have no rights..

The UN itself is a body that has been mired in human rights violations for decades.  It’s Peacekeepers charged with prostitution, rape, and sex trafficking.   Essentially, these activities have been funded by the US and the international community.  The UN is a shameful despot of corruption and most likely a large source and contributor to the world’s human trafficking, pedophilia, child trafficking and sex trafficking industries.

The UN is an embarrassment. Prince Zeid Ra’ad has an agenda and is simply using his position within the UN to affect that agenda instead of addressing the real issues that plague the world in Sudan, the Congo, Nigeria, Rwanda, Yemen, etc…

There are numerous arenas of trafficking, but the UN has been charged in Haiti, Bosnia, Ivory Coast, Somalia, Congo, Liberia, Sri Lanka, Central African Republic, Kosovo, Morocco… the list most likely extends to every country where the UN “Peacekeepers” engage.

This is the organization tasked with reporting human rights violations.  They are the worst offenders.  And it has existed for decades…

What is the UN doing to change these gross violations of human rights?  

According to the UN, they have taken a tough stance and now require vetting of deployed officers.  If the UN is for some reason unable to do the vetting, they urge the government where they deploy their officers to do the vetting for them.  If the government has ‘concerns’ about a particular officer, they can be repatriated and replaced.  Ah. Problem solved.

If that doesn’t work, well they wrote a Charter which states that the highest standards of conduct must include;  efficiency, integrity and competence, with zero tolerance for sexual exploitation. I’m sure the pedophiles and rapists are no longer applying for UN Peacekeeper jobs because they don’t meet the Charter standards.

And what has the UN done with regard to the past allegations?

They have ‘substantiated’ 2, the remaining allegations have been thrown out – no consequences.  Which means that these perpetrators are still employed, still receiving benefits, and we will provide them with a nice lucrative pension after they retire.  We taxpayers who have no pension…

Because it is all about money.  Follow the money.   The UN Budget for Peacekeeping?  For the period July 2016 to July 2017 it was $7.87 billion, which was apparently a bit less than the previous year.

Working for the UN is considered great!  Many have the option to work from home, and the payscale is quite generous offering housing, travel and food allowances, benefits, pensions, and free healthcare.  As of 2016, the UN Pension Fund was valued at $56 billion with an annual payout of roughly $2.3 billion. 

This is why the UN exists today – and the only reason.

TRUMP Speech at UN was exactly Trump

Another UN General Assembly and apparently the only speaker was Trump, because according to the media, no one else apparently said – anything… The entire mélange of dialogue from Deutscheland to France, to New York to The Economist has been the edification of Trump. Using such verbiage as “rhetoric”, the German newspaper quoted a number of students studying “Presidential Rhetoric” as their college major.   Really?  I wonder how many jobs there are for a major in presidential rhetoric…?

While Trump spoke as Trump does, it is odd that anyone would be surprised. What exactly did anyone expect?

The ‘rhetoric’ referenced centered around his comments regarding North Korea and Iran. The alter-rhetoric suggests that if the US backs out of the Iran deal, they will ramp up their proliferation of nuclear capabilities… As in pinky swear I won’t? What? Iran is going to do what Iran wants no matter what ‘deal’ is flitting about. And Kim Jong Un is going to continue strutting about like a cock in search of a hen until – he decides not to.

The media also seems to take issue with the concept that Trump conveyed, “America First”. As the media so wearily continues to do, it failed to present the entire dialogue; America is first for Trump, just as Germany should be first for Merkel, France for Macron, etc… In other words, he advocates sovereignty, a concept that the Socialists and Communists abhor, because it nullifies Globalism, a one world monetary system, and an effective UN centrist Communist government.

Trump also took aim at the UN budget, specifically, the “Peacekeeping” budget that is nearly $8 billion and counting. Given the UN’s Peacekeeping record is abysmal at best, and laughable by most accounts, in my opinion they could easily be neutralized from existence, as in – cut.

*The UN Peacekeepers and UK established the Israeli territory after WWII that they now claim should be given to the Palestinians because they goofed and the Palestinians are miffed and the UN feels bad.

*The UN has been the moniker monitor of peace between North and South Korea… not doing so well.

*The UN has brought peace and prosperity to Sudan… to The Congo… to Ukraine… to Venezuela… to Rwanda, the Ivory Coast, Haiti, Somalia, Cambodia, Mozambique…

Rife with scandals involving prostitution, sex trafficking, and sexual abuse, their successes are nowhere to be found.

In fact, the UN Secretary General, Guterres, who belongs to the Socialist Party and is a member of The Council on Foreign Relations, is calling on ‘world leaders’ to repair the world that has fallen into conflict, disarray and violence, effectively acknowledging that their Peacekeeping unit is defective, obsolete and worthless. Who edited his speech?

The only other speaker on the roster would appear to be Macron. Coming out of hiding after the expose regarding his obsession with expensive ‘makeup’, Macron’s words were exactly what we would expect – Socialism and Globalism.   The difference? Macron talks, but has no action other than applying makeup and hosting a few dinners. His actionable account is a qualified – zero.

Again the topic of choice for Macron and Guterres was the Paris Climate Change Agreement which is not a contract at all but a suggestion of pinky swear cooperation for which France has paid $0 into the pledged coffers. Obama put in $1 billion of the $3 billion he pledged toward the $100 billion per year budget. Analysts predict that budget will rise to more than $420 billion per year by 2020. Who is going to actually pay? To date roughly $5 billion has actually been raised including the $1 billion from US…  That’s pathetic.

China says they can’t reduce emissions until 2030, North Korea says they plan to increase emissions by 300%, Syria has said nothing, gasp, they are a country of rubble, and the money is supposedly going toward developing countries who produce -0- emissions. What the hey!

Fodder for Presidential Rhetoric majors analyzing Trump might want to consider the massive rhetoric being parlayed around the climate change ‘discussions’. But hey, it sounds good when blustering journalists and Hollywooders raise their fist and ‘demand’…

I have an idea!  Why doesn’t the UN pledge their entire Peacekeeping Budget to Climate Change in China…