The Ecological Impact of War And Bombs

Spain claims 1300 people died of the heat due to climate change. All of Europe is experiencing an exceptionally hot summer.  Temperatures have reached as high as 104 in some places… In Madrid average summer temperatures are in the 90’s. In America, temperatures in the southwest always reach into the 115 degree range during summer months.  So, what is making this year different?

BOMBS:

War and bombings cause localized ecological devastation and severe global climate disruption. Major military actions rapidly emit millions of tons of greenhouse gases, while mass destruction of infrastructure releases hazardous pollutants into the air, soil, and water. In 2024, The Guardian released an article discussing the global climate effects of Israel’s mass bombing after just 2 MONTHS. It has now expanded to nearly 2 years and added Syria and Lebanon into the equation.

In the first two months 281,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide was released. The multiplier of 20 months the amount of carbon conferred by Israel is now 2.81 million tons. All wastewater treatment plants and sewage pumps out of commission, over 130,000 cubic meters of untreated sewage are discharged directly into the Mediterranean Sea daily. The waste creates deadzones in the Mediterranean where aquatic life can no longer live. Toxic heavy metals, including lead and mercury and explosive residue have leached into the most pristine waters. The fishing industry has effectively collapsed in the entire Sea.

The agriculture land, the birds, the wild animals are all dead.  The soil is contaminated and would take decades to mitigate.  Jared’s Resort would be a toxic dystopia.  Russia and Ukraine have extended the environmental collapse of Europe and the Middle East. They are living under a cloud of toxins and domes of heat.

The militaries across the globe have the largest footprint of greenhouse gas emissions. War drills, setting off bombs in the oceans, in deserts, for funzies all year, every year, have damaged our ecosystem in the last century and created massive negative impacts on our precious ecosystem.  The department of Defense owns over 566,000 buildings worldwide accounting for 40% of fossil fuel use.

But it isn’t just gases and toxins released into the air and into the ground, it is the effect on human life.  With cancer topping the list. The pollution swept up by winds becomes solar bombs. Sometimes to the point that the death of land can never be repaired. Nonrecoverable biodiversity: 

During the Vietnam War, more than 5 million acres of forest and 500,000 acres of farmland were destroyed. Lush marshlands in Iraq were reduced to 10% of their prewar size during America’s Weapons of mass destruction war. Afghanistan has lost nearly 95% of forest coverage in recent decades.  Trump’s ‘peace through strength’ commentary and ideology is more about – ‘narcissism exercises of war’.  Yet every single war could have been avoided thru true détente. Instead we got shadow government manipulators espousing the Soros version of Satanic Chaos. Renaming the DoD told us everything we needed to know about Trump and his CLAN.

The Iran War is likely to tic upward as they have made it clear they have no intention of being bullied into submission. Trump has not complied with his side of the MOU, Israel continues to bomb Lebanon, and a container ship was given a different Hormuz route than agreed upon causing it to run aground – at Trump’s direction. Stupidity and Ego are always partners.

MAGNETIC NORTH:

Adding to the manmade climate change of WAR economies, the polar shift is in full swing with speeds hovering between 35 km to 55 km. While a complete flip would take many moons, the impact on weather is a here and now event that is not taken into account. It comes from within our core which alters ocean temperatures. Which alters the migration habits of our entire marine lifeforce.  Marine animals follow magnetic north in their migration habits. It is their inherent compass.

So, we are destroying our atmosphere while our inner core is completing its magnetic north flip cycle phase.

The excessive heat and toxins released by Bombs can alter classic cycles of La Nina and El Nino as well as jet streams.  El Nino has arrived as of this June and would typically result in wetter summers. Colorado had less than an inch of rain the month of June. Fire risk is at an all time extreme. Lawns are dead. Trees are losing the battle. Yet nary a drop. In fact, the weather predictors got out their crystal balls and declared that this el Nino would be a Super-Duper – as in flooding. Nary a drop.    

El Nino means ocean temperatures rise in the central and eastern Pacific. This means hurricane activity will stall on the east coast and rise on the western coast – particularly Mexico.  Countries below the equator experience the reverse – droughts and heat waves. The last el Nino was June 2023 thru April 2024 – for reference.

All in all, the wars we fight today are not comparable to all wars prior to the Industrial Revolution when fighting was on horseback and armory was gunpowder and swords. The only environment risk was decaying bodies. Nearly everything the Industrial Revolutions have brought us ended up as a military weapon from planes to bombs, to lasers, to drones. Even the next generation of fusion is being examined from the military point of view – how many can we kill with this…?

Just ask Palantir.

CLIMATE CHANGE: A Philosophy of Science Based On Opinion

“Can Dangerous Environmental Tipping Points Be Averted?”  ~ DW.com.   Short answer – NO.   Long answer – the media, the UN, the WEF have proclaimed that the end point has already been traversed multiple times – they just keep moving the goal posts.   Why?  The obvious answer is because the money going to the Green Fund needs a continuous flow in order to launder it back to politicians.  If they acknowledge we have reached the point of no return, why spend any more time, effort and money fixing a dead problem?

As of 12-31-22, the Green Fund was sitting on Assets of $11.7 Billion with total liabilities of $810 Million – the vast majority of which was a ‘new loan’.   Two outstanding figures on the Financial Statements include – Loans Receivable and Loans Payable.   Sitting on over $8 Billion in cash, it is curious the Green Fund would increase their borrowings by 90% over 2021, as in their ‘liability’.  Loans Receivable would indicate the fund is making ‘micro-loans’ instead of actually disbursing income – $11 billion is Assets/Cash.

Which of course, is the point – to raise contributions so that the fund becomes income generating via microloan interest rates exploiting the poor.   The Green Fund has many competitive friends including JP Morgan, George Soros, Citigroup, USAID, and Sequoia Capital who represent just a few of the investors who reap massive interest income rewards charging upwards of 100% per year.   The typical client?  Women.

What happens when a person cannot pay back the interest or the loan?   They lose their house, their land, their business, and often their – life.

The UN and World Bank are complicit.   The regional resources that are targeted are thus slowly transferred to the bank making the loans for pennies on the dollar.   Poverty is extended.   And local governments are given a piece of the profits to keep their mouths shut.

One such place is Barbados.  A colony of Britain, Barbados still operates slave trade.   The Green Fund and microlending are rife within this small island community.   Despite growing rage, King Charles’ response was to request a ‘study’ be done to assess the slavery on Barbados.  The Netherlands apologized and continued on unabated.   Typical farm employees earn $900 per month, 25% earn less than $600 per month.

The largest plantation land owner in Barbados is Richard Drax, a member of the British Parliament.   His family has been and continues to support the slave trade that has existed for over 200 years on his plantation.  While Drax failed to provide the required financials as a member of Parliament – it is estimated he is worth well over $150 million.

WATER SCARCITY

According to the UN University Institute For Environment and Human Security, 70% of groundwater is used for agriculture.   The plants that are the most water dependent are rice, soybeans, wheat, sugar, cotton and alfalfa.  Rice – they say – is a disaster for Africa due to the frequency of droughts. The drought friendly plants include peppers, chickpeas, corn, tomatoes, okra and rhubarb.  In Africa Sorghum is an abundant nutritious grain that is drought tolerant and is used for human consumption, animal feed, alcohol, and as a biofuel.  So why are they still growing rice?

The global cast for rice growing are China and India.  In fact, of the ten countries which are the producers of rice – Africa does not even factor in at all.  The myth.  China produces more than all countries combined with the elimination of India.  But the Green Fund, the UN, and the NOAA, don’t even mention China.   The countries producing the most soybeans?   Brazil and the US.   Soy is used extensively to make fake meats.  Other common ingredients include grains, beans and wheat – all of which require massive amounts of water.

In other words, the US and China are using the MOST water unsustainably than any other countries across the globe.  But the Green Fund goes to Africa…   Why?

Fast answer – because if Africa were to be able to develop its resources without western colonial interference – Africa would become a heavy weight industrial nation – competition. Therefore it is of paramount concern for the strategies implemented by the UN and Bill Gates to keep Africa in a forever state of abject poverty.  All while giving false information about the state of the Climate, the Globe, Food and Water.

Global Surface Temperature.

According to NOAA, between 1880 and 1940, the global surface temperature was negative – as in an ice age.  Between 1980 and present day, the surface temperature rose to 1.   1880 is used as the baseline because global surface temperatures were not taken and unknown prior to this year.   In fact, there was no ‘global’ baseline  because there was no ‘global measurement’, it was a singular measure taken either in Europe or the US.

The concept forces a false baseline and a false ‘global’ estimate.

The methodology of measuring sea temperature between 1880 and 1940 was accomplished via a sailor rowing out to sea, taking a bucket tied by a rope, collecting some water and measuring the temperature using a mercury thermometer.   Surface temperatures are taken at various stations around the globe, and their reliability is also suspect given the position of the stations is subject to ‘interpretation’.

As a result, raw data is ‘corrected’ to comply with the thought police of science …

In other words, surface and sea temperatures are unreliable today and worthless before, during and after upgrades in 1990.   The entire comparison methodology is false.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions:

Greenhouse gas emissions are measured via a formula based on utilizing CO2 levels as the equivalent and multiplying that by the Global Warming Potential (GWP).   The global warming potential assigns a grade to gases such as nitrous oxide, methane, etc…  However, some countries use a different value system in creating their ‘estimates’  which are ignored in the final tally by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) – created by the UN in 1988.   This GWP methodology was developed between 1995 and 1997 – when the world began…

The authors of these IPCC reports are aged from late 50’s to mid 80’s – well before Climate Change was offered in ANY university as a degree much less a program.   There is no true “expert on climate change”.

Making the entire methodology false and misleading.

The Climate Change Hoax for the advent of The Green Fund, was simply created as another $$$$$$$ Industry to launder money away from taxpayers to the governments.  It has no basis in reality and no basis in Science:   “The systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation, experimentation, and the testing of theories against the evidence obtained.”  

Climate Change is a philosophy – which is NOT a truth, but an opinion.