“Can Dangerous Environmental Tipping Points Be Averted?” ~ DW.com. Short answer – NO. Long answer – the media, the UN, the WEF have proclaimed that the end point has already been traversed multiple times – they just keep moving the goal posts. Why? The obvious answer is because the money going to the Green Fund needs a continuous flow in order to launder it back to politicians. If they acknowledge we have reached the point of no return, why spend any more time, effort and money fixing a dead problem?
As of 12-31-22, the Green Fund was sitting on Assets of $11.7 Billion with total liabilities of $810 Million – the vast majority of which was a ‘new loan’. Two outstanding figures on the Financial Statements include – Loans Receivable and Loans Payable. Sitting on over $8 Billion in cash, it is curious the Green Fund would increase their borrowings by 90% over 2021, as in their ‘liability’. Loans Receivable would indicate the fund is making ‘micro-loans’ instead of actually disbursing income – $11 billion is Assets/Cash.
Which of course, is the point – to raise contributions so that the fund becomes income generating via microloan interest rates exploiting the poor. The Green Fund has many competitive friends including JP Morgan, George Soros, Citigroup, USAID, and Sequoia Capital who represent just a few of the investors who reap massive interest income rewards charging upwards of 100% per year. The typical client? Women.
What happens when a person cannot pay back the interest or the loan? They lose their house, their land, their business, and often their – life.
The UN and World Bank are complicit. The regional resources that are targeted are thus slowly transferred to the bank making the loans for pennies on the dollar. Poverty is extended. And local governments are given a piece of the profits to keep their mouths shut.
One such place is Barbados. A colony of Britain, Barbados still operates slave trade. The Green Fund and microlending are rife within this small island community. Despite growing rage, King Charles’ response was to request a ‘study’ be done to assess the slavery on Barbados. The Netherlands apologized and continued on unabated. Typical farm employees earn $900 per month, 25% earn less than $600 per month.
The largest plantation land owner in Barbados is Richard Drax, a member of the British Parliament. His family has been and continues to support the slave trade that has existed for over 200 years on his plantation. While Drax failed to provide the required financials as a member of Parliament – it is estimated he is worth well over $150 million.
WATER SCARCITY
According to the UN University Institute For Environment and Human Security, 70% of groundwater is used for agriculture. The plants that are the most water dependent are rice, soybeans, wheat, sugar, cotton and alfalfa. Rice – they say – is a disaster for Africa due to the frequency of droughts. The drought friendly plants include peppers, chickpeas, corn, tomatoes, okra and rhubarb. In Africa Sorghum is an abundant nutritious grain that is drought tolerant and is used for human consumption, animal feed, alcohol, and as a biofuel. So why are they still growing rice?
The global cast for rice growing are China and India. In fact, of the ten countries which are the producers of rice – Africa does not even factor in at all. The myth. China produces more than all countries combined with the elimination of India. But the Green Fund, the UN, and the NOAA, don’t even mention China. The countries producing the most soybeans? Brazil and the US. Soy is used extensively to make fake meats. Other common ingredients include grains, beans and wheat – all of which require massive amounts of water.
In other words, the US and China are using the MOST water unsustainably than any other countries across the globe. But the Green Fund goes to Africa… Why?
Fast answer – because if Africa were to be able to develop its resources without western colonial interference – Africa would become a heavy weight industrial nation – competition. Therefore it is of paramount concern for the strategies implemented by the UN and Bill Gates to keep Africa in a forever state of abject poverty. All while giving false information about the state of the Climate, the Globe, Food and Water.
Global Surface Temperature.
According to NOAA, between 1880 and 1940, the global surface temperature was negative – as in an ice age. Between 1980 and present day, the surface temperature rose to 1. 1880 is used as the baseline because global surface temperatures were not taken and unknown prior to this year. In fact, there was no ‘global’ baseline because there was no ‘global measurement’, it was a singular measure taken either in Europe or the US.
The concept forces a false baseline and a false ‘global’ estimate.
The methodology of measuring sea temperature between 1880 and 1940 was accomplished via a sailor rowing out to sea, taking a bucket tied by a rope, collecting some water and measuring the temperature using a mercury thermometer. Surface temperatures are taken at various stations around the globe, and their reliability is also suspect given the position of the stations is subject to ‘interpretation’.
As a result, raw data is ‘corrected’ to comply with the thought police of science …
In other words, surface and sea temperatures are unreliable today and worthless before, during and after upgrades in 1990. The entire comparison methodology is false.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions:
Greenhouse gas emissions are measured via a formula based on utilizing CO2 levels as the equivalent and multiplying that by the Global Warming Potential (GWP). The global warming potential assigns a grade to gases such as nitrous oxide, methane, etc… However, some countries use a different value system in creating their ‘estimates’ which are ignored in the final tally by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) – created by the UN in 1988. This GWP methodology was developed between 1995 and 1997 – when the world began…
The authors of these IPCC reports are aged from late 50’s to mid 80’s – well before Climate Change was offered in ANY university as a degree much less a program. There is no true “expert on climate change”.
Making the entire methodology false and misleading.
The Climate Change Hoax for the advent of The Green Fund, was simply created as another $$$$$$$ Industry to launder money away from taxpayers to the governments. It has no basis in reality and no basis in Science: “The systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation, experimentation, and the testing of theories against the evidence obtained.”
Climate Change is a philosophy – which is NOT a truth, but an opinion.
I agree that it’s all mostly opinion in the sense that much of it is presented devoid of actual facts. But turns out there are facts. And those facts make it clear that the whole issue is not an opinion but a joke. A joke about people with a rare combination of low intelligence and strong delusions of grandeur. They’re going to save the planet, they’re just not smart enough to figure out of it needs saving. Let’s talk about that weather data from 1880-1940. “Global” temperature data in no way meant ‘ the temperature of the globe’ but simply all the temperature data available from around the globe. The entire THREE PERCENT of the entire thatglobe surface that was regularly monitored for temperature. In fact it wasn’t until we launched satellites in the mid 70s that we ever had meaningful data on a full 5% of the global surface. Then in the early 1990s the USSR fell and nearly half of the weather stations in the world were abandoned. THE EXACT SAME TIME THAT THEY CLAIM THE CURRENT UPTICK IN TEMPERATURES STARTED. OMG really?! So we lost 2000 weather stations in Siberia and the average temperatures from the remaining stations went up?! Sound the alarms!! This simple fact collapses the entire house of cards. And exposes the basic lack in intelligence of those making such claims. And thats before we even begin to discuss the lack of calibration standards, whole number temperature reporting, significant figures, scammy proxy measurements, etc etc. It’s just one big toilet flush of scientific gobbledygook. A masters course in how to do science exactly wrong and simultaneously be a self righteous prick about it. It’s advertising your dipshittedness as virtue. There’s not a verifiable fact to be found in the whole charade nor a single person with the competence to deal with it. It’s just assholes smelling their own emanations day. Opinions in many cases can be correct and virtuous and enlightened. The Climate Con does not even rise to meet this description. Not even once ever. It only has one opinion and it is embarrassingly wrong and literally cannot even be proven.
Well said
I have been a research scientist for 35 years in the field of Earth Science, published some 200 peer-reviewed papers and was fortunate to collaborate with some of the best scientists in a range of sub-fields of Earth Science including climate change. I have concluded after careful research in the field that the Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) theory is a massive fraud not supported by solid science, the UN’s/Maurice Strong Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was never about science but the corruption of science in support of a depopulation agenda, carbon dioxide is not a pollutant but the gas of life that drives photosynthesis thereby sustaining life on this planet, an increase of some 100 ppm in CO2 atmospheric concentrations over past 100 years has had very little impact on climate change but has increased plant productivity significantly, and the attack on the gas of life by programs to reduce atmospheric carbon levels is diabolical in the extreme and constitutes an attack on life itself.
IKR, it’s equally appalling to think, a) they’re not smart enough to grasp this or b) they do grasp it yet still want to do it anyway. It’s a pure psychopathy. We are already at CO2 levels that are dangerously low for our biosphere. Just as we are at replacement reproductive rates that are dangerously low for our survival (don’t let ‘rising population’ scare you. When it stops rising mankind is doomed). Yet every agenda is about aggressively reducing both. It’s so antihuman and antilife that you just want to smack the smirk off the face of every idiot person tossing these agendas around as a measure of their virtue. I have a permanent picture in my mind of all the braindead consumer program units, desperately wanting to seem intellectual, in skinny jeans and thin glasses, clapping at the speed of a hummingbirds wings as they give Greta Thunberg a standing ovation. That single image pretty much describes the whole world and my opinion of it. How did we get here?
Interesting view on Richard Drax MP, but he can’t be all bad, yes he is well off, white and heterosexual, so the pc establishment will not like him. But;
he does have a military background [having served in Northern Ireland] and other places. A background in journalism and yes, politics. But does he own slaves in Barbados? Or is it simply he, or is representatives who manage his assets in Barbados pay the going rate for staff employed [wage slave or actual slave, worthy of an article in itself, as most of the population are simply free range wage slaves]
In which case the UK and the US, both with multinational corporations are similarly guilty.
The so called green agenda is but another way of syphoning off assets to be used for whatever purpose the people and/or companies who control these assets choose. It is not a new idea, Mutual Investment companies, Pension funds and Insurance companies have been around for centuries, taking the contributors money [regular savings] to cover life/health Insurance, mortgage and loans. so long as the cover the liabilities and pay out as and when required, many people are too happy to let them manage their money.
The problems as I see it is one of two things Politicians will try to micromanage these organisations [but will not take responsibility for their collective actions and secondly. People will use these ideas, to gain and hold power due to both greed and hunger for power.
Two examples come to mind Al Gore and Mrs Thatcher. Al Gore used his position as Senator and then VPOTUS to advance the environmentalist/green agenda to gain more power and wealth. [a side issue, I have often thought that when a person becomes a politician his/her wealth position should be audited and when he ceases to be a politician, audited again.]
Mrs Thatcher UK PM, the much praised lady and champion of free enterprise and capitalism [crony] ransacked the UK private pension schemes
[h##ps://www.professionalpensions.com/feature/2261768/-thatchers-governments-changed-pensions] reduced taxes, and increased subsidies [to certain sections of the community] sold of at knock down prices many of the UK state assets that had been paid for and developed by the UK tax-payers over the decades. Leaving the UK in a worse financial situation after she left office.
I believe the nearest things in the US to our mutual investment companies are Vanguard and their ilk.
You have Trust funds [a bit like our Charitable companies] but on steroids and seem to an outsider to be largely unregulated and a way of sheltering assets from the tax man, whilst still enjoying a lifestyle and power that these trusts provide.
Before I leave, back to Richard Drax MP. h##ps://www.richarddrax.com/news/w2w-freedoms-under-threat leads to an article which from reading your blog is of a similar nature to your own.
That’s it for now, I am slowly reading through your most interesting and Informative blog.
Helena, we both know that CC is the recurrent “Current Thing”. Ukraine is a failure, Hamas/Israel is next, et al ad infinitum.
As my father was only the Chief Admin of the US RR Retirement Board (HQed In Chicago then at 844 Rush St.), my knowledge is rather limited, unlike you. But, in July 1961 I was taken onto the Senate Floor by Ev Dirksen. And that slimeball Rostenskowski(sic) showed up in our living room, begging for a fake disability claim shortly thereafter. Edison Park was a great place to grow up before we moved back home to Jackson, MS. Throwing empty popcorn boxes at the Pickwick into Hillary was fun. Her Middle Skool summer boyfriend from Charlotte, Bill Belk (mother from Park Ridge), told me as such.
Anda might be interested in a small sculpture for our place in Beaufort, SC. Unless the missing F-35 from the Beaufort MCAS bombs us. It’s only 11 miles away. And Parris Island is 10.
Keep it up!