According to the CDC and WHO, the United States has fully vaccinated 46% of the population as of August 8th.   So why is the White House declaring that the 70% target has been reached?   In addition, the total number of doses administered is stated to be 106 per 100 people.   If in fact we had reached 70% fully vaccinated and 59% administered one shot (per the White House numbers), that would equate to 232,397,000 fully vaccinated with 2 shots and 194,866,000 given one shot – or 130% of the total US population.   Sounds like Election Night…  Right?

Is this the new Common Core Math?

The Uk numbers are equally as bewildering:   47,058,639 people have been given one dose.   39,551,518 have been given 2 doses. 86,611,177 doses have been administered… But the math doesn’t come close!   39,511,518×2 = 79,023,036+47,058,639 = 126,081,675 doses…   Who does their Math?

But Math would not seem to be a strong point in anything ‘science’.   The UK has stated that in order to reach climate neutral, every household will have to take a significant financial hit in the short term, meaning 10-20 years.  For many – that short-term would be their remaining life.

The first effort will be to install all new heating systems to replace the gas boilers. To that effort, the UK government has pledged 600,000 new energy conserving heat systems will be installed every year through 2028.   Assuming a start date of January 2022, that would mean 4,200,000 new systems total.   But the funding only supports 12,500 per year, resulting in a shortage of 4,112,500… a 98% shortfall.

But it sounds good when blustered from a pulpit!

Psychiatry is another absurdity in the realm of reality.   UK psychiatrists will open their first psychedelic therapy clinic this autumn using magic mushrooms to treat mental illness!   Given this sort of treatment worked so well in the 1950’s wherein LSD was the nome-de-pleu, I imagine the suicide rates will explode! But given suicide has always been the cure for mental health issues – we should not be surprised.   In the US that would represent 27% of the total population.

And then there is this UK nugget: inflation is being driven higher due to increased spending… Ah.   Unemployment has apparently peaked in the UK, but labor shortages are also a contributory cause to inflation.   Wait, far fewer are employed but they are all spending like crazy…  That’s logical.  I have a novel solution, require the unemployed to work…   Inflation & unemployment – SOLVED!

The Bank of England states that living standards will be severely impacted for the next two years… or so… due to the higher inflation rate of 4%…  The Jimmy Carter inflation rate was 15% or higher…   I wonder if that is the sustainable goal?

The Federal Reserve calculates that healthcare inflation is well under 2% per year and has been since 1975.   Since 2007, PWC’s Health Research Institute graphs the inflation of healthcare from a high of 11.9% inflation rate in 2007 to a projected 6.5% in 2022.   The US Bureau of Labor Statistics states the 2021 inflation rate for healthcare is .94%.     None of these are remotely similar.   Follow The Science.

And then there is energy – our price at the pump for petrol.   According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, as of June 30th 2021, gas prices surged 45%.   According to New England Oil, gas at the pump now costs \$2.59.   In Colorado, gas prices have risen more than 78%. Cherry-Picking!   California gas prices have risen from \$2.6 to \$4.25, an increase of 64%.   Exactly how does this factor a 4% inflation rate?   Other commodities would have to have declined by 60%???   It’s not meat, not housing, not food, not appliances, not furniture, not not.   Follow The Math.

But it is – Science.

Deutsche Bank is blaming the Federal Reserve for manipulating inflation with the intent of creating a recession and a chain of financial distress. The Federal Reserve response is ‘posh, nonsense, you don’t have a clue what you are talking about’,  inflation is a temporary condition of internal unknown, undefined ‘special factors’ which will wane in the short term. Apparently, the Feds state they will not tighten monetary controls until it sees ‘substantial further progress’ toward it’s Inclusive Goals.

I wasn’t aware that the Federal Reserve was responsible for inclusivity… But it does sound oddly compatible with the UN and WEF as though they now envision themselves as The Big Three!   The Global Rulers.

How exciting!   A plethora of socialists, communists, marxists, and greenie wieners ruling the globe from their thrones of gold…. Or bitcoin? Whatever the case may be.   Que Sera… look no further than what Pelosi is buying and selling…  Just Give Me Some Moneyyyy –

1. Dean Jackson says:

“According to the CDC and WHO, the United States has fully vaccinated 46% of the population as of August 8th.”

How is it possible that the general public forgot that contagious respiratory viruses can’t operate in the Spring and Summer months due to heat and humidity,* thereby identifying a Marxist scam to initiate the “abolition of religion”, and the destruction of those civilizations “whose spiritual aroma is religion”.

In the Southern Hemisphere Winter months span June – September, where the cold & flu season ends in October.

Now you know why not one medical facility/institution has sourced COVID-19 with its lipid envelop…because it doesn’t exist outside of a jerry rigged RNA genome stored in computer repositories.
———————–
* That’s why cold & flu season takes place only in Fall and Winter months…remember.

2. Dean Jackson says:

“And then there is this UK nugget: inflation is being driven higher due to increased spending… Ah.”

If spending is increasing then something else is declining, thereby negating a general price increase in prices. Inflation is the inherent decline in the value of the currency, not a temporary increase in consumer prices, which is offset by a decline in savings for investment, resulting in the general price level balancing out.

3. Dean Jackson says:

The Hoax of Mental Illness: Stick Out Your Thoughts And Say “Ahhh!”

How does one differentiate/diagnose an ‘ill’ thought from a ‘well’ thought? Is my desire to kill someone intrinsically ‘ill’? Not if I’m defending myself or my family from someone with intent to murder. However, if I believe someone to have intent of murdering me but that person is behaving peacefully, then one can rightly diagnose my thoughts to kill as being caused by schizophrenia. We therefore see there is no such thing as an ‘ill’ thought, since an ‘ill’ thought is a ‘well’ thought in another setting, but we do see there is such a thing as schizophrenia, which is caused by a chemical imbalance in the brain, and is treated with drugs.

Or put another way…

If I defend myself by killing someone who is trying to kill me, how does that though to kill differ from someone who has the same thought to kill but is suffering from schizophrenia, where the person he believes is trying to kill him is actually behaving peacefully? We therefore see there is no such thing as an ‘ill’ thought, since an ‘ill’ thought is a ‘well’ thought in another setting, but we do see there is such a thing as schizophrenia, which is caused by a chemical imbalance in the brain, and is treated with drugs. By definition a thought can never be ill, only the physical brain can be ill. Thoughts are neither ‘well’ nor ‘ill’. Thoughts are merely representations of what we believe reality to be, and that perception of reality can be adversely affected by a neurological illness, not a mental illness. Medical science has no jurisdiction over thoughts.

One’s emotions, too, are representations of what we believe reality to be, whether the reality is based on internal stimuli or external stimuli. For example, feelings of paranoia can be based on concerns that are real or totally imagined, but an imagined concern cannot be called ill since the same paranoid feeling in another setting is ‘well’. If the police informs a citizen that there’s a contract out on the citizen’s life, then feelings of paranoia will assist the citizen to be wary of new acquaintances and strangers, and to avoid deserted locations, thereby enhancing the citizen’s chances of living. If on the other hand the paranoid state is due to a chemical imbalance in the brain, then such feelings are caused by a physical condition in the brain, not feelings. Emotions are neither ‘well’ nor ‘ill’. Emotions are merely representations of what we believe reality to be, and that perception of reality can be adversely affected by a neurological illness, not a mental illness. Medical science has no jurisdiction over emotions.

Of course situational paranoia as exhibited by the target of a contract killing, a soldier on a combat mission, or the staff of an intelligence agency’s counterintelligence section, has a different origin than those who suffer from non-neurological continuum paranoia. Non-neurological continuum paranoia begins in childhood where the affected child’s reality constitutes daily horrific realities. These are the formative years that children distinguish from what is real and what is not real. Their reality has instructed the children to trust nobody, to be always on guard because they ’know’ from experience that people are waiting for any opportunity to physically abuse, sabotage, deride and ridicule them. Fortunately this is but a small number of children who suffer such physical and emotional abuse, but what if such abuse was the norm? Then non-neurological continuum paranoid behavior would be the norm, and persons exhibiting outgoing, trusting, behaviors would be the ones suffering from ‘mental illness’ because they can’t adjust to the dangerous realities of society.

We therefore see that those exhibiting non-neurological continuum paranoid personalities are quite well, since they have learned from their personal experiences when growing up as a child that reality is harsh and brutish. Calling their thought processes ‘ill’ is a misnomer at best, and a pejorative at worst that denies their emotional and physical trauma. The affected are quite ‘well’, their thoughts reflecting their formative experiences when a child.

Even critics of mental illness have failed to observe this basic principle of science. Dr. Thomas Szasz broke ground in 1961 with his psychiatry-bashing book The Myth of Mental Illness: Foundations of a Theory of Personal Conduct, seeing mental illness as the excuse a patient uses to evade life’s difficulties-expectations. Nowhere in the book, however, does Szasz mention why mental processes – thoughts and emotions – can’t be ill! Thoughts are reactions to the stimuli being received by the brain, and the stimuli being transmitted can be reality or unreality in the case of a brain affected by a chemical imbalance. Thoughts don’t initiate themselves, they require stimuli and in rare cases the stimuli is faulty due to chemical imbalances in the brain. Therefore it is chemically induced faulty stimuli requiring the medical attention, not the thought.

Mental illness propagandists are Marxists, preparing for the new ‘liberated’ world, which necessitates involuntary incarceration of those who would upset Marxists’ plans. And as in all matters having to do with Marxist schemes, we have the false opposition ‘critics’ of mental illness. This false opposition tactic is what Marxists call the Scissors Strategy, in which the blades represent the two falsely opposed sides that converge on the confused victims, neutralizing true opposition to socialism, thereby allowing the advancement of socialism to the bewilderment of the true opposition.

4. Great article. So much is now compromised to promote the agenda of indoctrination and propaganda. Even science is no longer pure.

5. ken says:

Hi

” Sounds like Election Night… Right?” ROFLMAO….. nailed it!

Thanks for my daily chuckle! In fact the whole article wreaked of comedic madness! Fantastic, your best yet. Nothing better than a good sense of humor while being beaten with sticks. Or is it needles and masks!

Oh,,, According to self proclaimed genius (no,,, not that one) and AI computer coder Martin Armstrong printing trillions will not cause inflation… so, we’re safe there!

regards