Defense Contractors Fund “Charities” that Propagate War

The Forces behind the Forces includes the heavy weights who prop up, support, and fund an endless anti-Russia campaign.   Coincidentally, it would appear a few of the notables also profit from a war agenda and military destabilization; Raytheon, General Dynamics, DynCorp, Lockheed Martin, Saab, NATO, BAE Systems, Department of State, and George Soros. Conflict of interest? You BET!

Defense contractors funding organizations that promote the idea that a particular country is an ‘axis of evil’ seems a propaganda tool at best, and a conspiracy at worst.   Given these Defense contractors garner most of the revenue from government contracts, stoking tensions, possible wars, is in their best interest.

After WWII when defense spending climbed to it’s peak of 40% of GDP, a steady decline languished spending to a low of 3% of GDP until 2001 and the War on Terror was introduced. There were a few surges, Korean War, War on Iraq, the Cold War and of course, Vietnam.

Are the incursions we create simply props for these defense contractors to remain profitable?

The war on Russia seems to have taken a shift with the advent of newly formed lobbyist organizations whose sole purpose, it would seem, is to stoke a fire from ebbing embers. A number of these so-called “Charities” receive funding from governments…  It would seem the definition of a Charity has been morphed considerably!     The most dominant of these organizations include: The Atlantic Council, German Marshall Fund of the US, The Center For European Policy Analysis, and The Institute For The Study of War,

The Institute For The Study of War gained a rather notably shameful reputation when it was revealed that their expert on Syria, Elizabeth O’Bagy, was a fraud.   O’Bagy was an adamant proponent of bombing the regime while failing to reveal that she was part of a pro-Syrian rebel lobbying group. In addition, she lied about having obtained her PhD. McCain immediately hired her as a part of his staff upon her disgrace and firing.

Headed by Dr. Kagan, the bio’s of its analysts would indicate that they have an instrumental role in making final determinations regarding US strategy in the Middle East, specifically Syria, Iran and Iraq, as well as Russia, and Ukraine.   These senior analysts provide plans and exercises for the US military in implementing defeat.

The US takeover of Damascus has been a recent focus.

The German Marshall Fund is most notably – not German, but another DC ‘think-tank’ whose function would be to promote global inclusion and a liberal democracy wherein immigrants from the world over are embraced.   It also would appear to support globalization, and a rule of law and ‘authority’ promulgated by experts who make the military and government decisions – for them. With revenue over $28 million and assets over $200 million, their wealth accumulation is noteworthy…

The GMF undertakes round table discussions, some of which are considered by ‘invitation only’ and Chatham House Rules. Taking placer in London, strict rules are instituted which allow for open discussions that are completely and entirely forbidden from media or any other person that might compromise the secrecy.   In the past, this system has breeched economic ethics and order through market manipulation.

Currently, the relationship between Turkey and Russia are forefront topics.

The Center For European Research is headed by Daniel Gros, a German who co-authored the study for the design of the EU. He writes commentaries for Project Syndicate whose other authors include Bill Gates and George Soros and whose funding is derived from the Open Society Foundation, Die Zeit, a German publication utilizing the MacMillan name in the US, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

And finally, The Atlantic Council.   Initially formed to align European policy with US policy following WWII – a form of globalization.   By far the most powerful of all the aforementioned groups, they are intertwined in governments and militaries across the globe, receiving over $23 million in revenue nearly half of which is spent on ‘compensation’.   Their current CEO is Frederick Kempe, a journalist, and the Chairman of the Board is Jon Huntsman a Republican who has worked in the Obama administration and is now Ambassador to Russia under Trump.

The power that these organizations wield over our economic and political policies here in the US and across every region of the world, is enormous and can not be over-stated. But more importantly is who they represent, because it has nothing to do with The People and everything to do with maintaining discord.

Immigrants and Assisted Living – A Crisis Unfolding

The New York Times has just released an article that provides a liberal view of why we need immigrants in the US, ie, in order to take care of the aging population.   Sort of like the slave trade, only different because they will be paid minimum wage.   The basis for this argument stems from the fact that we have a shortage of medical personnel, most specifically, nurse assistants.  But as usual, The New York Times has completely missed the relative point.

In the US, a Certified Nurse Assistant is trained according to a rigorous education that lasts about 75 hours, or 2-4 weeks.   The average pay for a CNA in a hospital is $11.68 per hour which equates to roughly $23,000 per year.   Immigrants are the primary source of labor for these jobs, and the nursing industry is claiming to be paralyzed as shortages grow out of fear of Trump’s immigration program.

The industry considers fast food restaurants to be their greatest competition for employees.   Given there are generally no benefits, native born Americans aren’t willing to work these grueling jobs at minimum pay. Instead, over 1.8 million immigrants from Haiti, El Salvador, Somalia and Honduras fill the gap, many speaking broken or no English.   Most are on Federal welfare programs, including food stamps and Medicaid.

But the real crisis is only just beginning, and it isn’t so much about immigrant slave labor as it is about the looming shortage of affordable nursing care facilities.   In 2013 the average cost of a nursing home was a staggering $81,000 per year for a ‘semi-private’ room.   Think Medicare will pay for it? Think again.

Medicare is broken into definitions of care.   They will pick up 100 days of convalescent care, and up to 60 days of physical therapy.   Some nursing homes take Medicare, most don’t.

Facilities that were taking Medicaid are finding their liability is high, their labor is less than stellar, and their land is more valuable than the business.   Private facilities start at around $6500 per person per month in Colorado.   And the only way to find a state facility through Medicaid is to be relieved of all your assets excluding $2000, while the remaining stay at home spouse may have assets totaling a whopping $116,000.   A house? Not allowed unless it is worth less than $116,000.

Baby Boomers are coming of age.   Only a small proportion will have the resources to fund a private facility stay, the remainder will become a burden on their children. The immigrant CNA workforce picking up the labor shortage in Private and Medicaid facilities will not affect the real problem because their value is minimal in terms of cost.

Today there are over 46 million US citizens over the age of 65.   There are 28,000 assisted living facilities housing roughly one million residents.   The average age of residents is between 75 and 83 and the majority are women.   Facilities are broken down into various definitions, including; independent living, assisted living, critical care, and Alzheimer care.

You want to fix the problem? You have to correctly identify it.  Immigration has been justified by Liberals not from a position of compassion and love, but as a means of propping up an aging population in need of slave labor and social security tax revenue. In Europe, it is far move prevalent as the birth rate has plummeted for decades.   The fact that the immigrants in these countries prove to be more of a financial and cultural burden than benefit, has yet to be addressed given it is not ‘politically correct’.

The only other means of mitigating this coming crisis is to cut down the aging population, through disease or war, or both.   But the grisly reality is it has absolutely nothing to do with compassion and everything to do with an agenda, a need, and a looming disaster about to spiral out of control.

NHS: The UK’s Crisis of Funding?

NHS – when something is broke, just throw more money at it and hope it goes away…   Britain’s NHS is once again afire despite another round of ‘additional funding’ on top of the ‘additional funding’ it already received, over the funding and ‘additional winter funding’ it received.   Socialist medicine at it’s finest!

As if the Canadian socialist health system wasn’t enough to give us a view of how bad it can be, NHS in Britain and Wales is desperately trying to prop itself back up, not with an overhaul of the problems, but with more $$$$$$$! Cha-Ching!

A shortage of doctors and nurses, cancellation of thousands of non-urgent operations, a budget in shambles, neglect charges, hospital acquired infections, a postcode lottery, cost effectiveness of care, the issuance of a ‘black alert’ wherein it is an official admission that it is unable to cope with demand, and the fifth largest employer in the world, NHS is beyond a simple injection of ‘more money’ and needs a drastic face, eye and body lift to survive.

When it was first introduced in 1948, the budget was 248 million pounds for 480,000 hospital beds. In 2017, its total budget was just under $125 billion for 167,000 hospital beds.   As of 2007, the waiting list stood at 1,283,100.   Various political bents try and under-report the budgetary needs so as to prop up the remaining idealism of socialist medicine only to find their proverbial foot in mouth disease when reality is declared. The truth told, NHS is failing because it is a socialist-welfare system and as such it doesn’t work.

It is the fear that plagues most Americans as we watch our own socialist Obamacare fry a bit more each year. My annual healthcare costs amount to roughly 20% of my income. Of course those receiving free healthcare, government employees, and even those on Medicare, seem oblivious given the ‘it doesn’t affect me’ syndrome.

Arguments still abound as the philosophical debate over whether Obamacare is Socialism or Socialized Healthcare or a mashed capital system don’t “fix” the problems.   The media would liken the increased number of participants on the Obamacare Exchange as proof positive it is a success! But of course, when the Exchange is the only source for obtaining Healthcare, that would likely ‘increase its use’… Right?   Logic still prevails even when the media attempts to speak in tongues

Like most Socialist initiatives, when they are first rolled out, when every I is dotted, they seem to work rather well, that is until reality fades in and out only to take hold at some point of time in the near future. Such was the case for NHS.   Welfare creates a behavior attitude. When something costs less or is ‘free’, more people will take advantage of that offer whether they need it or not. That increased usage drives up costs that must now be propped up by premiums and/or government subsidies.

In the US it is passed on through premium rate hikes. In the UK it is passed on by greater indebtedness by the government. Simple economics – when the government is tasked with funding more welfare, either some other program is cut, or taxes are hiked.   Getting people who have been given something free to say they will suddenly pay their fair share – is nearly impossible. Once the propaganda has been injected into the system, it can rarely be purged.

France has been touted as having one of the best systems in the world. How? By eliminating the middle man, the insurance industry, France has created a universal system in which the government acts as the insurance agency. This would be much like the Social Security system in the US that works so well… Except that it doesn’t.   So what went wrong?

Demographics.

France, Germany, The Netherlands, Norway, Switzerland, etc… have all experienced a negative population growth that stands to create dire problems in the next decade as the youth market has vanished.   This same shift will ultimately put immense strife on these healthcare systems as the aged pay nothing for healthcare and the youth population is insufficient to prop up healthcare.   In France, wages are taxed a 13% surcharge for healthcare. In the US that would mean a person earning $45,000 would see an automatic $5850 deduction from their pay whether they went to the doctor or not.

The once sweetheart of healthcare, France, is watching its system flail, falter and go broke.   Germany too is being weighed down – not just from a shifting demographic, but from the adjunct of immigrant healthcare.   The unemployment rate in France is 9.7%, with 6.2% underemployed. The youth unemployment rate is far worse at over 21%.   The numbers do not include immigrants not granted employment status or citizenship.   For example, The Netherlands now requires seven years residency before a person may file for naturalization.   Germany is 8 years and France is five years.

Therefore, the unemployment rates are skewed and far higher than reported.

The UK is already operating on a 40-58 billion pound annual deficit.   Where exactly should the additional money for the failing NHS system be extracted?   And with the added pressure of the EU Commission aligned with Merkel and Macron demanding BREXIT divorce costs upwards of $53 billion and counting, it is a difficult notion to address exactly how the UK proposes to mitigate these issues.

It’s complicated.

The understatement for every political agenda and person that exists today.   Putin recently made some comment that how the system works is completely contrary to what we are led to believe. The innuendo would be that what we see, what we believe, is basically a house of mirrors.

Not necessarily far-fetched, but most definitely not mainstream.   Mainstream would have us believe that everything they say is the Gospel, everything they do – is Christ’s walk – and everything they think – is God’s journey.   It is a far far craggy path – but it is nothing per nothing – that they would have us believe. It is far greater. Far more beautiful. And far more carved in stone.

There is nothing more challenging than betrayal. Whether it be from a colleague, a friend, a spouse, a blood relative, it is something that weights incredibly heavily on the heart and soul.   I have had the privilege of bearing such weight.   From multiple sources.   And each time, I feel it anew, as though I have never experienced it before.   And although it is a part of my history, each time, it devastates me, takes me, and I feel its ravage. And each time, the perpetrator feels privileged, entitled to their war, all the while proclaiming their devout affinity to peace, love and compassion.

How can that be?

CIA – A Rogue British StepChild

The rhetoric coming out of defunct CIA Directors in slamming the release of the Nunes memo is that the ‘release’ has undermined the trust and respect and dependence that American citizens had for the CIA.   The shadow government is being cast into the light, the cloak of darkness shaken, and what is exposed is a rogue agency that was created, run, and operated to enhance One agenda only – A World Order wherein we are all virtual slaves to their Protocol of Truth.  

The precursor to the CIA was the OSS, Office of Strategic Services, created as the stepchild of British Intelligence during WWII, as requested by FDR and William Stephenson, a senior British intelligence officer. The unit was created, coordinated and informed from intelligence garnered from the British Secret Service – M16 and SOE. That would mean that the OSS, for all intents and purposes, was simply an extension of the British spy agency operating as a stepchild utilizing US taxpayer funding.

While the OSS is said to have come under the auspices of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in WWII, FDR and Churchill created a Combined unit, the CCS, which was installed as the “Supreme Military Body” and tasked with strategic direction of the “British Empire”.   Therefore, all ultimate decisions came from Britain, including the initial alliance “with the Nazi’s”.

After WWII, the government had no definable reason to continue the OSS given it was sold to the US citizens as a wartime machinization.   The shadow government comprised of oil and banking icons, and by default Truman, felt that a unified post-war system should be introduced and thus formed the UN, NATO, National Security Council and the CIA.  Utilizing the media, which was predominantly then owned by the banking cartel, Truman sold his new organizations to the American people by creating an ‘evil’, the USSR.   Despite the fact that the USSR was an ally in WWII, suffered heinous losses, casualties and internal destruction, this flip-flop of alliance was necessary in order to fulfill the agenda.

The cabal’s wealth had grown exponentially during WWI and WWII, the Rockefeller’s, Chase, the Morgans, the Rothschild’s had all benefited quite nicely during their propaganda war efforts, but now it was necessary to combine that wealth so as to create the ultimate object – World Power.

Utilizing the CIA was their largest weapon.  

The CIA was created for one purpose – to operate as the covert military arm of the cabal.

Over the next 7 decades the CIA conducted coups and attempted coups in; Italy, Guatemala, Iran, Vietnam, Hungary, Laos, Haiti, Cuba, Ecuador, Dominican Republic, Congo, Brazil, Indonesia, Greece, Bolivia, Chile, El Salvador, Australia, Angola, Nicaragua, Honduras, Panama, Iraq, Yemen, Ukraine, and the Soviet Union.

Propaganda Operations were utilized to establish fake opinions including; MK Ultra, Operation Mockingbird, Operation Paperclip, Operation Phoenix, and Operation CHAOS, amidst many more unnamed to date.

While the CIA worked outside of the public eye, while the media continued to parlay a popularity ring, the corruption within was virtually either forgotten or blindly accepted. Kennedy has been charged with claiming he wanted to shred the CIA.   And x-agents have attempted to expose the corruption numerous times, only to be met with death threats, lawsuits and extradition.   This is the organization that Brennan, Comey, Clapper and Mueller condone as a respected part of the US government.

The notion that Truth undermines respect is basically saying that as long as US citizens believe in a fake ideal it is a worthy confidence.   And this fake confidence should not be disrupted with Truth…

The last Budget information available dates from 2013, wherein the CIA garnered over $15 billion in taxpayer funds.   M-16 takes in over $3 billion.   There are 16 additional spy organizations funded in the US government budget. And while the Empire may no longer be referred to as the British Empire or the US Empire, an Empire is being built – it just isn’t by or for who we might be led to believe.