Germany – Legal Prostitution and Rape Crisis

Flawed theory – legalizing prostitution will create a healthier environment, less rape and less std’s.

Prostitution IS Sex Trafficking.

While Germany would like to promote itself as being forward thinking and liberal in it’s legalizing of prostitution, I doubt the children and adults of sex trafficking are applauding. I doubt the victims of rape are cheering.

Germany wanted to be progressive. They thought that if prostitution was legal, it would be cleaner. They thought that it would promote better health and less disease among the prostitutes. They wanted the clients to feel more comfortable. They thought legality meant capital competition. They did no research. And now they are one of the world leaders in the business of sex trade.

The perversity of the decriminalization by three women in the German Bundestag has seen the growth of an industry so dehumanizing girls rarely escape. Reports now abound that provide evidence that when prostitution is legalized, trafficking inflows increase dramatically. Those inflows include children. Having full knowledge of the trafficking problems in countries like the Philippines, Thailand and Cambodia, Germany chose to ignore the obvious and go for the resulting $$dollars.

Legalizing prostitution created a taxable revenue stream. Topping $18 billion, Germany has now earned itself fourth position in world prostitution revenue. China is first at $73 billion, then Spain at $26 billion, and Japan at $24 billion. How a country, a government, can knowingly decriminalize an industry that trades and exploits children is unbelievable. At the same time, Germany makes homeschooling children a criminal charge. Hypocrisy at it’s finest.

In Germany, the majority of trafficked girls come from Bulgaria and Romania. The idea that legalizing would create a cleaner, more efficient business has fallen far from its glory. Still, advocates try and taut it as a success given that rape crimes and gonorrhea cases have been driven down. But that simply isn’t so. In fact, Germany has risen to the rank of 8th in the top ten countries for rape as of 2014. And Spain, where prostitution is also legal, ranks 2nd in the world. Sweden, where prostitution is legal for the seller, ranked 3rd..

Rape has also risen dramatically in Denmark, Sweden and Norway. The common factor – in Denmark 50% of the convicted rapists were immigrants despite the fact they make up 10% of the population. In Sweden, 77.6% of the rapists are classified as foreigners ( Muslim immigrants). In Norway 100% of aggravated rapes involving physical violence were committed by individuals of African, Asian or Middle Eastern origin.

It is estimated that only 13% of victims report the crime.

The media is silent, the politicians are silent, fearful that they might become a target, fearful that they might ‘offend’ a culture, fearful that these statistics could create a wave of knowledge whereby citizens actually have access to truth.

What has declined is the conviction rate. Some of our European politicians go so far as to sympathize with the rapist as being a traumatized immigrant who just needs help and a hug…

The notion that legalizing a crime will reduce the ‘act’ is seriously flawed. Legalizing alcohol certainly did not reduce consumption, underage consumption, or over drinking issues.

In places like Cambodia, Thailand, Brazil and the Philippines, the value of human life is low. The value of morality does not exist. Slavery and prostitution are a means to an end, not an industry as proponents would like us to believe, most often not a chosen line of ‘work’, but instead nothing more than a means for survival. Period. The idea that it is anything else is naïve and self serving. Another argument for prostitution claims it is simply ‘a lifestyle’, and we must be tolerant of this way of making a living.

But look at the faces. These are not the faces of choice and lifestyle, these are the faces of slaves.

A sex vacation? Germany offers travel tours for up to eight days inside a brothel, promising 100 sex slaves who will perform anything you want. The latest and greatest escape! How riche, how gauche, how depraved. Who are their clientele?

Koreans continually top the list as the most frequented clients in Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia and the Philippines. But they certainly aren’t alone. Sixty to eighty percent of Cambodian men admit to using prostitutes despite having a wife and multiple girlfriends. In Thailand 50% of boys aged 16 and 90% of university students visit brothels. Nearly 65% of young people in Italy want the reintroduction of legal brothels. In Spain, seeing a prostitute is considered an expression of individual freedom.

The thread? The rise of the sex trade is in direct proportion to the internet, and to the psychology of free love. Free love saw the decline of morality. The internet provides discount advertising, free porn sites to get you aroused, and an abundance of girls that tease and tempt. MSN and Fox both aggravate and taunt with headlines of nude selfies. And Hollywood has branded itself as a sex exploitive industry. Money can buy anything in the entertainment world – and in a world without morals, it does. Using prohibition as an example, legalizing alcohol had two impacts; increasing sales, increasing government revenue. Prostitution would be no different.

Busts are rare and although the numbers are high with freeing 106 children or 140 children, the numbers are so insignificant in percentages as to make for no true fear to rise in the hearts of the pimps. Considering that statistics are estimates in this case – the number of sex enslaved children in the US is about 2 million. If 140 are rescued there are still 1,999,860 enslaved.

Does legalizing prostitution do anything for society? It adds revenue to government coffers. We could legalize hit men too, or tax theft, or money laundering, we could legalize fraud and corruption and have a heyday at the bank.

Just saying…

Sister Diana Momeka – Christian Persecution

Iraqi Christians, Egyptian Christians, Syrian Christians – what do they have in common?

In a sense they were all protected by their countries dictators, Saddam Hussein, Mubarek and Assad. They were protected not necessarily because they were Christian, but because it was the law of the land to quell all violence and ethnic cleansing which has occurred since those dictators rule was felled. Hussein and Mubarek gave protection in return for support, but Assad was actually closer to a benefactor of the Christians. In fact, according to Andrew Tabler of The Washington Institute, Syrian Christians were some of the most devout supporters of Assad as they provided a bridge to international relationships. It may even have been this ‘bridge’ that gave Assad the support of Putin, an Orthodox Christian.

With the fall of each of these dictators, the Christian population immediately became target for cleansing by the newly placed de-facto governments as well as by ISIS and Al Qaeda. Their populations in all three countries have been sliced in half or more since the ousting of the quasi sympatheric dictatorships. While these dictators perpetrated heinous acts of human rights violations, what was then and what is now is even more fascist.

Taking out the dictators and sending these countries into an internal civil spiral without authoritarian rule, was akin to laying open the gate for the Trojan Horse to enter. Only inside this Trojan Horse were the greater evil, the blackest hearts to raze the land and it’s people without hesitation. It is parallel to the conquering during the time of Muhammed only larger, more grave, more filled with hatred. It is the paradigm of rule. While under Saddam’s rule it is estimated that upward of 100,000 to 180,000 civilians were executed. After Hussein was toppled the timeline is fettered with death; suicide bombs, guerrilla war, Shi’a leader killed, suicide bomber at Red cross and Police Headquarters during Ramadan, US helicopter downed, Italian troops killed, Irbil suicide bombs, police station attacked, massacre on Shi’a Holy Day, US contractors killed, Shi’a uprisings, US bombs Falluja Mosque, Basra attacks, prisoner abuse charges, beheadings, scores killed in Bacuba bombing, Iraqi army recruits killed, attack on US base in Mosul, on and on and on.

By July 2006, four years after ousting Saddam, over 110,000-180,000 ‘civilians’ had been killed in Iraq, according to the official count by the Iraqi Ministry of Health. Many claim this figure is low, but at what point is the number not relative? What is the allowed collateral in a war invoked by one nation to ‘free’ another.

Sister Diana Momeka was slated to testify before Congress along with a delegation from Iraq on the systemic persecution of Iraqi Christians. Despite her original invitation, her passage was revoked when the State Department, John Kerry, decided that she posed a flight risk. In other words, given that she was considered a ‘displaced citizen’ as a result of the infighting in Iraq, she was a threat on American soil.

In 2009, Sister Momeka was living in the US and recounted bombings of churches in Iraq. Seven churches were bombed during 2004 and 2005 while filled with Christian worshipers. Rapes, executions, beheadings, became a way of life after 2003. She said that the people initially looked forward to freedom, but had no idea what that would look like until it was upon them. She lost four cousins and a brother, killed not just by the Islamists but by US soldiers as well.

According to Sister Momeka, 2 million Iraqi’s were displaced inside Iraq without jobs or food after Saddam’s ousting, 5 million fled Iraq and there are now over 1 million widows as a result of fighting. Prior to the war, she said that Muslims and Christians lived side by side without distrust, without persecution, without judgement.

As of 2000, the religious demographics of Iraq was about 63% Shi’a, 32% Sunni and 3% Christian. Today the Christian population represents .8%.

Of course the question begs, why would the US State Department be afraid of the testimony of this nun? What could she possibly say that might be cause for embarrassment, or worse truth?

Given the mainstream media has squelched the story, it also opens the discussion as to what information with regard to Iraq is muffled and altered to fit a preconceived vision?

These countries have been taken over by Al Nusra, Al Qaeda and ISIS. These countries have been targeted by the US. These countries are seeing an unprecedented cleansing of Christians. Why is that not important enough to address?

Stats: between 322 and 800 Christians are murdered each month for being Christian – 214 Christian properties destroyed – 722 Christians are targeted by violence.  These numbers are guesstimates, the Vatican and others put these numbers significantly higher.

Baltimore Mom – Stand Tall

I smiled.  I thought it was poignant and fresh!  And then I thought, oh dang, is Social Services going to come pounding at her door? Will the police arrest her for assault? Child Abuse? Will the vulture media turn into the hall of judgement?

Cuffing a misbehaving child on the head, dragging him by the arm, were reactionary responses by a mother desperately wanting to protect her child from harm. Utilizing discipline in a way that will get her son to pay attention is specific to her, her son, and the situation. She knows him a whole lot better than anyone else and knows what it will take to get him in line. The immediate media response was – go for it – but after the storm, there were those criticizing the mom and claiming she was acting in a rageful fit.

Really? Exactly how would you react if your sixteen year old son was deep in the midst of a riot throwing rocks at the police? Would you calmly and gently use your pretty voice to restrain him and encourage him to come home? “Honey, pleeeasseee”. I don’t think so. And the police didn’t either. They were ready, willing and able to use whatever force necessary, and it would most likely have been a lot more violent than a cuff to the head and a yank on the sleeve. Reality check.

The last gripe I have in this instance is the media questioning the mom’s character because she has six kids and is a single mom. When did this become a ‘character flaw’? Do you really think that was a choice? Do you think she woke up one day and said, “I know, I’m going to have a bunch of kids and no husband or father”? I think she is doing the best she can given some pretty unfun circumstances and she should be lauded for keeping it together. What is with this society that sits back like a panel of judges and points a gnarly finger of condemnation. Get Over It!

It is amazing how far the pendulum has swung in such a ridiculously radical direction of action-consequence. This is not condoning beating a child, it is supporting the action of getting the goof ball out of harms way whatever it takes! He suffered no abrasions, no trauma, no emotional scars except for embarrassment.

So, anyway, Social Services, media, get your panties straight and save it for true abusive situations that you seem to neglect, forget or don’t find worth – for example I had to go to a French paper to find out that Maine has admitted to systematically removing tribal children from their native American homes and putting them in foster care without just cause … just saying –

FYI – apparently, according to the time zone that monitors my blog, I am being hosted out of Iceland from the town of Reykjavik.