Christmas Parade Massacre: Genocide at the Hands of The Tribal Cabal?

Over the last 22 years, Darrell Brooks had been charged with at least ten different crimes.  He was a registered sexual offender in Nevada.  He jumped bail in 2016 and had an outstanding warrant issued.   His offenses include possession of a stolen firearm by a felon, drugs, and domestic violence.  And despite Brook’s Facebook presence, investigators claim that although they knew he was living in Wisconsin and wanted by Nevada prosecutors, they couldn’t pinpoint exactly where he was living…?   The Wisconsin DA, John Chisholm, who allowed Brooks to walk on a $1000 bail after he assaulted and ran over his ex-girlfriend weeks earlier, would have had access to ALL his previous arrest records.

Chisholm’s first duty would have been to turn Brooks over to the Nevada prosecutors office via the outstanding warrant.   He didn’t.

And now the abject negligence of that DA should call into question not only his ability to serve, his law license, and his mental acuity, but his complicity in the death of 6 and the injury of 48.

Blame is a gambit.

But the fact remains that Brooks is only one of thousands who should have been imprisoned and were zealously allowed to walk by liberal/progressive DA’s who have vacated law and justice for chaos and death.

From the heart of it, knowing Brooks had engaged in a knife attack and assaulted his ex-girlfriend moments before the massacre, this was not retribution for the Rittenhouse verdict, it was the actions of a severely deranged psychotic man who was negligently allowed to roam free.   It is the judicial system that the democrats liken to fair and equitable justice.   Meaning they support murder, as long as the murder victims are white.  

Could this be labeled Genocide?

Definition of Genocide:   “ the deliberate killing of a large number of people from a particular nation or ethnic group with the aim of destroying that nation or group.”

Given Chisholm is on record stating that the changes made to bail law in Milwaukee could result in more deaths, this represents an admission.   Knowingly and with intent.

Chisholm’s bio states:    “Under John’s leadership, Milwaukee County prosecutors have sent fewer people to prison for nonviolent offenses and built new pathways to diversion and treatment for individuals suffering from mental health and substance abuse challenges. John has built strong partnerships with the Public Defender’s Office and community advocates to ensure transparency and accountability in charging decisions and prosecutions. Progressive prosecutors in Philadelphia, Boston, St. Louis, and San Francisco have followed in John’s footsteps and designed similar programs.”

Milwaukee is rated 8th HIGHEST in crime rates at nearly 40 per 1000 residents over 400% greater than Wisconsin.

But this is what the intro to his bio reads:   “John Chisholm is a bold reformer with a track record of keeping our community safe.” 

Chisholm’s model sites San Francisco which is now ranked 6th highest in the nation. Philadelphia is 9th highest with 38.1 ‘reported’ crimes per 1000.   Chisholm made a grave mistake when naming the top liberal-progressive cities as models for his crime ridden county – because he has unwittingly implicated a deliberate schematic that could fall within the definition of ‘genocide’.

Genocide falls under the rule of law as imposed by our One World Government internthe UN’s International Court and the UN’s Human Rights Court. According to their preamble, these UN institutions are responsible for the ‘restoration of the rule of law’!

The Office of the High Commissioner of the UN International Court is Michelle Bachelet.     Bachelet is a socialist agnostic degreed physician who previously served as the president of Chile.  During her tenure as Chile’s president, her approval rating tanked to possibly the lowest of all presidents in all time at 15% amidst corruption allegations.   Despite this – the UN felt a corrupt former president was a good candidate for human rights.

During her tenure as High Commissioner, Bachelet has done absolutely – nothing:

Despite absolute proof that the Uyghurs in China were being tortured and abused, she has done nothing.   Despite the Saudi led bombing of Yemen, Bachelet ‘did’ nothing.  Despite the suffering of civilians during the conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan, Bachelet – did nothing.  And despite her doing nothing anywhere for anyone, she remains the High Commissioner for Human Rights charged with deliberating Genocide.

If the UN plans to represent itself as the Agenda 2030 global governance body, they have accomplished nothing of value.   Their reputation is toilet paper.   And their ability to lead is based on accolade, not performance.   They are in essence court Jesters.

Two synonyms for court jesters are ‘fool’ and ‘servant’.   A performer who entertains.  It was during Medieval times that the phrase ‘kill the messenger’ was coined to refer to jesters. They were the sacrifice.

In a civilized world actually proving one’s worth through dedicated hard work while holding to the highest principles of the Rule Of Law would be considered a normal ladder.   Today, that ladder is merely a footstool.   The footstool is made of clay.  The clay does not yield good soil for thriving plants and vegetation.   And the vine dies.

Chisholm may find himself the first sacrifice by the Tribal Cabal as fool to the Kings.

Saudis Framed By Liberals?

Update:   Apple has stated that there is no functioning between Apple Watch and I-phone for video/file sharing or recording.  Also, there is no fingerprint access on an Apple watch as the media is stating.  No one in Khashoggi’s family, including his son who was with him in Turkey, have ever heard of the ‘fiancee Hatch Cengiz’.   Al Jazeera, based out of Qatar is responsible for most of the stories being picked up by MSM.

 

It’s odd that the MSM is suddenly so ‘shocked’ by the supposed Saudi assassination of the Washington Post journalist, Jamal Khashoggi, in Turkey.  The Saudi’s have been executing people for centuries, celebrating the beheadings in local squares, and not once has it earned them a rebuke – by anyone. The first four months of 2018, they beheaded 48 people!   No one blinked.  They average over 160 per year.  Every single year.  No one peeps. No one turns away their money. 

In this case, is Jamal Khashoggi worth $110 billion?

Certainly the Clintons are not about to denounce the Saudis.  They supported the Foundation that supported Hillary’s campaign slush fund for a decade!  Right?  Not so fast.   The Clinton’s are notorious for wreaking vengeance on those who do not support their regime of Hillarydom and the Saudis are now well entrenched with Trump.

According to the Washington Post, the Turkish government claims to have audio and visual proof of the execution which occurred in the embassy.  However, Turkey doesn’t want to release it because it will prove that they have spy technology throughout the embassy and likely all embassies.  Which is a no-no.  And of course, no one could have possibly guessed…  What?

But this is just a single strand of hay in the haystack that is Saudi Arabia and Human Rights.  Lest we forget, the UN’s Human Rights Council which judges other countries abuses…and thus initiates penalizing those other countries, is burgeoning with a host of abusive countries. Obviously the UN doesn’t really care, nor do they see the obvious hypocrisy. The new and improved UN board to police Human Rights includes such notable countries as;  Somalia, Eritrea, Burkina Faso, Egypt, Cuba, Bangladesh, China etc…

But don’t tell anyone…

Has the UN lost its mind – or did it ever have one?

The UN Human Rights Council has compiled a report of 38 countries whose violations have been considered atrocious, including a number of the countries whose governments reside on the Council.   This isn’t a new phenomena, the UN seems to arbitrarily appoint councils knowing full well they are violators – like a bully pulpit.   What’s the point?  Apparently, none at all.   And the atrocity of Human Rights remains thus – an atrocity.

Enter a Human Rights atrocity – a missing man who was anti-Trump, anti-Saudi Arabia, who is pictured entering an embassy in Turkey and supposedly – never exiting.  Another Muslim Brotherhood woman appears, claims to be his fiancee, and appeals directly to Trump to help avenge.

Immediately, members of Congress, predominantly Democrats, are calling for the cancelation of military contracts, and sanctions, Trump is a bit more pragmatic noting that those military contracts are significant and economically important which is why despite infinite infractions no President has ever had the guts to impose sanctions on Saudi Arabia which has embraced every US President. Too much money involved.

Khashoggi was not a US citizen.   He wrote some articles for the Washington Post, but he also wrote for the BBC, Al Jazeera, MBC, Dubai, and Al Arabiya.   So maybe those host countries should be doing the sanctioning?  And in fact, December 2016, he was banned by Saudi Arabian authorities from publishing or appearing on television “for criticizing US President-elect Donald Trump“.  He was appointed head of the Muslim Brotherhood and in his writings inferred a need to realign the Saudi world thru the elimination of the Monarchial rule.

There would seem to be more to this shift than meets the eye.

A number of ultra liberal companies and media outlets are already suspending projects with the Saudis in response to Khashoggi’s ‘disappearance/assassination’.   Without a formal charge or investigation.  Those outlets include:   New York Times, The Economist, CNN, Bloomberg, Financial Times, and numerous others led by the very liberal, Richard Branson, founder of Virgin Group.

So far, all the ‘evidence’ is based on anonymous sources.  All the focus is on how Trump will respond – and that begs a deeper look into the possibility this is a setup.   Everything that the Washington Post has stated comes from anonymous police sources, anonymous Turkish authorities – and suddenly begins to sound a lot like the Liberal political entrapment of anonymous for which the MSM and Washington Post are most famous – Trump Dossier.

Media outlets in Turkey site the Washington Post for the story…  while blaming the US for creating instability throughout the Middle East, and citing the Gulf-Iran rivalry.  Which goes back to the Liberal agenda of Iran… and the revoking of the Iran Deal invoked by Obama – by Trump.

Thus, it begins to look even more like a setup to frame Trump.

The Hurriyet Daily News out of Turkey claims that Turkish authorities have possession of Khashoggi’s Apple watch which they claim synched with his cell phone which he gave to his fiancée who was waiting outside the embassy.  None of which makes sense.  A)  why would he give his cellphone to his fiancee?   B)  if in fact his body was dismembered and disposed of by the Saudis as claimed, how could the Turkish authorities have his watch?   C)  If the Apple watch was linked to his cellphone which his fiancée was holding, why did she subsequently ask Trump to demand the Saudis produce the security camera footage from inside the embassy if the evidentiary footage was on the cellphone she was holding?

Trying to fill the holes in the entire anonymous argument, Turkish authorities now claim that the Saudi’s unlocked the watch, deleted ‘some of the damaging files’, leaving undeleted files on his cellphone that incriminated the Saudis.  Which means the Turkish authorities have his cellphone…

Al Arabiya, a Saudi media, claims that the entire story has been concocted, that the fiancé, Hatice Cengiz, who is Turkish, is also a member of the Muslim Brotherhood working in conjunction with Qatar to destabilize Saudi relationships, and that there was no marriage or relationship between Cengiz and Khashoggi (he is 60 and she is 36).    The Khashoggi family has a long history of dealings with MI6 and the CIA, fraud, arms sales, and lavish lifestyles.  Dodi Fayad, Princess Di’s lover, is also a relative.

Cengiz has been vocal about pleading for both Donald and Melania Trump to do something…  Why isn’t she asking Erdogan? Why does she only talk to WAPO and CNN?  Why does the ‘one’ picture of her with Khashoggi look decidedly photoshopped?  Why is the information so discombobulated and anonymous?

Sometimes digging a deeper hole to hide in – only means there is more dirt to dispose of.

UN Honors – Saudi Arabia For Human Rights

Saudi Arabia:

“Wanted: no previous experience required. Must be able to lift heavy sword. Must not fear blood and death. Good pay and health benefits. Hours of employment – flexible. May be asked to perform additional duties, such as amputations and torture. No recruiters please, only serious Male candidates should apply.”

United Nations:

“Wanted: Human Rights Advocate. Must uphold the greatest value of human rights and human dignity, unless torture and public executions are deemed necessary for The Greater Good, in which case, go for it. but make sure not to get any of that blood on my Armani suit.  And as for women and children, we adamantly agree that they are inferior, so whatever suppression you deem appropriate we uphold and will never challenge. Indiscriminate civilian bombing is okay too as long as you make sure to call it ‘coalition’ bombing in the name of terrorism. Okay then, that about sums it up… oh and must rank among the lowest in the world for social and economic freedom.”

The United Nations.

NewsFlash – “UN launches $25 billion strategy to end preventable deaths of mothers and children.”

I have a solution, and it doesn’t cost $25 billion… stop! That’s it. Just stop. Stop bombing Yemen. Stop beheading civilians. Stop torture. Stop denying women rights.

On Yemen: “UN urges parties to stop this fighting and return to negotiating table…”

According to NATO, Yemen’s problems are: water shortage, unemployment, poverty, lack of education, oil rich, corruption, rural population, al Qaeda in the Peninsula, radical Shi’a clerics, and division.

Saudi, NATO, US solution: Bomb everyone, eradicate the entire population and instill puppet government– end of problem.

Oh wait… al Qaeda… no matter.

Like Syria… no matter.

So when did the UN become an ineffective corrupt institution? After being roiled in abuses and corruption for decades, most recently the oil for food scandal in Baghdad kickbacks, the UN set up a self regulating anti-corruption task force in 2006. After just two years, they declared everything was hunky-dory and disbanded in 2008. Who decided that?  Why the UN General Assembly did.  You see, the UN is given complete authority to hide everything from financial opacity to internal department opacity, to censorship. Their power is absolute.

UN Peacekeepers were charged with rape, sexual abuse, gun running, and abuse. But what has been done since the allegations? Well, the head of the Peacekeeping agency was sacked… and that’s it. Will the abuse stop? No! It’s been an issue for decades – decades! And the UN is the perpetrator. The same UN using $25 billion to end preventable deaths, the same UN spending billions on Human Rights, the same UN that is required to provide NO financial accountability. The same UN that elects Saudi Arabia as one of their ambassadors for Human Rights.

The issue with the UN stems from issues with its leadership, past and present, specifically Ban Ki Moon. Former representatives, employees and delegates, have expressed concerns over internal favoritism, of control over internal audits and investigations, over corruption charges, over refusal to hand over court ordered documents and over the constant deference to ‘immunity’ despite heinous abuses and crime.

While Ban Ki Moon is considered a gentle person, a man content to be in the shadows, a man humble and courteous, these are qualities of a monk, not a world leader. And so goes the UN having accomplished little to nothing with no oversight and a chaotic over-growth of governmental quackery.

The rule and law within the agency has been described by former under-secretary, Inga-Britt Alhenius, as deplorable and seriously embarrassing, an agency drifting into irrelevance.

Bringing Saudi Arabia into the Human Rights council is wholly a political move that further discredits the entire value structure and reputation of the UN.  It is truly beyond any moral, ethical or value system in our careening spiral into complete depravity.

So how much does the US ante up to this organization?

No one is exactly sure… You see, while the US is on the hook for roughly 25% of the budget, no one wants to advertise what that budget actually is because, well, then they’d have to actually tell us how it is spent.

Apparently, there are two budgets, a core and a system budget. As of 2011, some estimated the system budget at $25 billion which would put the US obligation at roughly $6 billion. But there are no numbers for the ‘core budget’. Even Susan Rice of the US State Department refused to provide any answer when asked about the UN Budget numbers. Stonewalled, we can ante up our tax dollars indiscriminately, or we can ask for accountability.

If the US ante’s up six, ten, fifteen billion annually, and if Saudi Arabia votes against the US in typical referendums over 70% of the time, and the US continues to give foreign aid to Saudi Arabia, and Saudi Arabia continues to mutilate it’s citizens, persecute its women and crucify its children – what the HECK ARE WE DOING?