FACT CHECK Organizations – Liberal, Biased and Comical

A new and improved Fact checking – media bias – organization is making its way around the world of news – creatively calling themselves ‘media bias fact check’.   Organized in 2015, their tag line is ‘the most comprehensive media bias resource’.  The founder/editor Dave Van Zandt states that he uses volunteers to do his bidding and that he has a degree in communications.   Some of his fact checking point pieces link back to PolitiFact, another fact checking media bias organization.   Many, if not most, of these unbiased unaffiliated fact check checkers are hugely biased and left leaning and are promoted by Facebook as the real deal.  

In actuality, they aren’t remotely the real deal, and so incredibly biased it could be comical, except that some people actually believe them.

One of PolitiFacts latest scourge was to call Trump a half-liar because he said the Democrats wanted the wall before he wanted the wall.  According to PolitiFact, not all Democrats wanted the wall, just Hillary, Schumer, and Obama.  Secondly, they didn’t build a wall – they built a fence.   Really!  Therefore, Trump lied.  Really! That is their logic and rationale.

PolitiFact is funded by the uber liberal Knight Foundation, and it’s CEO, Alberto Ibarguen, who are heavy donors to Clinton.  Other liberal donors include, Ford Foundation, Democracy Fund, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.  The Democracy Fund was created by Pierre Omidyar of eBay and donated heavily to Hillary, Obama and Pelosi.  A prevue of their site is much like reading the Washington Post – it is a swarmy replication of anti-Trump, anti-Hannity, pro-Obama cheap-o-meter garbage.

In 2018, The Poynter Institute acquired PolitiFact.    The Poynter Institute receives its funding from Omidyar, Bill and Melinda Gates, Google, Open Society Foundations, National Endowment for Democracy and the Park Foundation.

The National Endowment For Democracy is funded by none other than the US Congress.   The President of NED is Carl Gershman who previously served as Executive Director of Social Democrats USA, and was an officer of the Young Peoples Socialist League.   In 2006, he laughingly stated that he’s not really a Socialist, he’s now a Democrat…

PolitiFact now utilizes a live fact stream whereby they claim the moment a politician makes a statement on television, it is fact checked for being true or false which means a) they have to make an analysis within seconds,  and b) john Q public is immediately streamed a Democrat liberal bias.

While PolitiFact desperately highlights the fact that they won a Pulitzer Prize, a)   The Pulitzer has been discredited routinely for only rewarding liberals – over a 31 year span only 5 conservatives won prizes for commentary,  and b) in order to be considered for the prize, you enter yourself and pay an entry fee.  For example, the current administrator on the board formerly worked for the liberal – New York Times.  Essentially it is much like Hollywood’s Golden Globes, wherein liberal Hollywood honors liberal Hollywood.

So what we have is an unbiased, unaffiliated fact checker organization funded by Socialists, Democrats, and Soros that is promoted as the Real McCoy by Facebook to shut down Trump, bloggers and conservatives as ‘false’ while regurgitating fake news.

Snopes has been around since 1994 and was created by David and Barbara Mikkelson.   It too has claimed to be unbiased, unaffiliated, and just a good ole boy urban legend outfit that happens to be used by MSNBC, CNN, The New York Times, and Forbes.

Snopes was fact checked by Factcheck.org which gave it an A+++.  Factcheck.org is owned by the Annenberg Foundation and was launched by former CNN reporter, Brooks Jackson.  No bias there…   In 2015, Barbara and David Mikkelson went through a very nasty, bitter, scandal fueled divorce in which she claimed that he was spending their ad money like it was jelly beans, hiring prostitutes, and looting the company.  Barbara filed a lawsuit.   He countersued.  David is now sole owner of Snopes has remarried and hired on his staff, Elyssa Young, a former escort and porn actress.  In 2004, Elyssa ran for Hawaii’s 1stCongressional District as a Libertarian and lost flatly.  David has also hired as one of his principle fact checkers, Kim LaCapria, whose former experience includes her own blogosphere site, Vice Vixen, an exploitive site that discussed sex, sex toys, hedonism and fetishes.  She brags that she is high on pot when she writes for Snopes.

Many of the Fact Checking sites are so biased it is absurdity at its finest, or lowest, it is a form of censorship, it is replete with fakery and anonymity.  They are supported and funded by liberal Democrats bent on feeding the public a Mockingbird of information.  Basically, they work for the same liberal media they fact check…  Coockoo… 

Hillary’s Teleprompter Debate Rigging?

A modem light, a teleprompter, hand signals, and a man directly involved in negotiation and production of major candidate’s debates.

Two men that are not workmen, but a part of Hillary’s stable, approach Hillary’s podium before the debate and work behind it while on their knees. They exit stage.

During the debate, a horizontal light can be seen on her podium and a flashing light beneath her on a shelf. The horizontal light and flashing light revert to black after the debate ends and she leaves her podium.

And BOOM – a conspiracy is born – with quite a bit of evidence.

Immediately after the debate, Brady Williamson, a lawyer whose website claims he is ‘directly involved in the negotiation and production of major political debates’, can be seen picking up Hillary’s papers, and some objects which he covertly transfers to his pocket before walking toward Lester Holt and giving him a smug expression and possibly ‘something’. Williamson then returns to the podium as though checking for something a number of times, reaching down, crouching, trying and failing to detach something without being noticed.  Distracted, as though he can’t grasp what he needs, he walks away.

A woman in a green dress appears in the video frame standing behind the podium and Williamson.  She seems to be a lookout gesturing whenever the camera is focused on Williamson as though in warning. He has not been able to gather what he needs and his agitation is evident. He stands up walks to the side stage with the woman in green while repeatedly looking back at the podium.  They appear to be evaluating the situation.  He speaks with her and then walks back on stage and over toward Hillary and Bill. He then can be seen talking with someone else – pointing to the podium. He is most definitely very concerned at this point.

Suddenly another woman approaches Billy and they have a short whispered discussion before Williamson once again approaches the podium and is spooked away. More whispering with this other woman and the Billy before they, Bill and Hillary choose to walk back toward the podium, instead of exiting the stage. As they and two others approach the podium, Williamson is blocked from complete video view, but it is evident that he has extracted an object from the podium. Unfortunately, the photography is grainy and although he seems satisfied that he has gotten what he needed, it is not clear what that object is.  

They then all exit simultaneously surrounded now by body guards.

Finally, as the stage is emptied and the audience is leaving another man appears at the Clinton podium and appears to unhook a box of some sort – perhaps a receiver – before walking off stage. And yet another man appears briefly and removes additional objects before disappearing.

During the debate there are continual moments in which Hillary rubs her finger on the side of her nose, and each time Lester Holt would seem to interrupt Trump to allow Hillary the opportunity to counter with a ‘zinger’.

Was the debate rigged?  Did Hillary have advance notice of the questions?  Was she being prompted in her answers by a teleprompt which provided her very pact answers?  Was the blinking light a modem or battery pack for the teleprompter?  Is she capable of answering a question without a teleprompter?

But other questions fly…  Why would this lawyer, Brady C Williamson, extend himself, his integrity, his reputation and put it all in jeopardy for Hillarygate?

While his relationship to the Clintons dates back to Bill’s presidency, his most recent boast deserves a mention:  His constitutional work has been sponsored, under a grant from the U.S. government, by the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs…”

The National Democratic Institute: 

Critics charge that the term “democracy assistance” and “democracy building” are rhetorically employed to overpower nationalist and socialist resistance to US economic and cultural domination, particularly in Russia.

It is affiliated with two notable organizations, the Liberal International and the Socialist International, both based in London. THE NDI is funded by the US Department of State (Hillary) and The Open Society Institute (Soros). Other notable contributors include: Google, Amazon and Madelaine Albright who has multiple connections with Soros and his agenda.

In 2004, Williamson was also an ‘observer’ in the Ukraine election that was considered pivotal in US vs Russia alliance.

He has been the attorney at large in major bankruptcy cases including GM and Lehman. Cases that made multi-millions for the attorneys who are stated to even charge daily fees for limo services, and a pack of gum… Appointments, one would not want to lose.

And while the media is focusing on Trumps lack of preparedness, they seem to gloss over the fact that Hillary has always used a teleprompter, and can not speak without one. Of course, the only way a teleprompter can be effective – is if the questions are already known so as to provide the correct answers.

FYI:  While Snopes has already falsified these allegations, their reasoning, journalism, research, and vilification is absurdly vacant and appears to be a response created for them by another source…