Haim Saban

Israel – Slammed by US and UN

Posted on by Helena

A New York Times Op-ed by Haim Saban in 2012, sums up the Obama presidency’s foreign policy with respect to Israel and Iran… In the piece Mr Saban explains how Obama is a definitive unequivocal supporter of Israel and how Iran’s nuclear capability is completely ‘off the table’. And based on these absolute facts, Mr. Saban was voting for Obama.

But then, Obama changed his mind, or he just ‘unequivocally’ lied.

Our own State Department and White House are apparently lying despite evidence that we helped orchestrate the UN vote against Israel and pro- Palestine.

Maybe Mr. Saban lied and never had any affinity for Israel… Who the heck knows anymore with the lies built on lies built on lies. It reminds me of the scientific proof-theory-hypothesis that supports evolution based on a core theory which is then dolloped with a mountain of facts and more theories to come up with a hypothesis that is labeled – Fact.

Despite the fact that Russia voted against Israel, the defiling of Israel seems oddly close to the defiling of Russia. Sanctions, inaccurate news, propaganda, destruction, and ultimately severing of economic needs.

The UN Security Council is comprised of 15 members, some of which are permanent, and some who have two year terms. The permanent members include the US, UK, France, Russia, and China, while the non-permanent rotating members include; Ukraine, Senegal, Japan, New Zealand, Malaysia, Egypt, Angola, Uruguay, Spain and Venezuela. Sixty countries have never been members of the security council.

Rife with corruption, genocide and war, Biden told Ukraine how to vote. Five of the non-permanent members term will be terminated as of December 31, 2016. Timing is everything

  1. Senegal is Islamic.
  2.  “The Economist, which is owned an operated by the Globalist Rothschilds, named Uruguay “country of the year” in 2013, acknowledging the innovative policy of legalizing the production, sale and consumption of cannabis. Same-sex marriage and abortion are also legal, leading Uruguay to be regarded as one of the most liberal nations in the world, and one of the most socially developed.”
  3. Angola is considered in dire straits due to its humanitarian crisis, its displacement of wealth, its famine, and its authoritarian regime.  Not a particularly positive country to judge another…
  4. Malaysia is predominantly Sunni Islam. It’s Prime Minister is Muslim and was educated in the UK. Malaysia has never recognized Israel and has condemned it from the get-go.

It is easy to see why these countries voted as they did.

New Zealand was one of the countries that ratified the appropriation of land for Israel in 1949. Their support of Israel has been unwavering since, that is until 2015 when they assigned an ambassador to Israel and the same ambassador to Palestine. Somewhat of a conflict of interest. But it would appear their vote is more out of anxiety to have an end to the conflict, than about who is right and wrong.

Again the obvious question remains, with the Jewish people being culled from most of the Middle East and the complete diaspora of land masses, ie, Saudi Arabia and Egypt, why isn’t the solution to partition a chunk of their land a solution?

Saudi Arabia is 830,000 square miles of land. By comparison, Palestine has an area of about 2100 square miles to a total area for Israel of 8000 sq miles or less than 1% of the land available to Saudi Arabia.

Since 1948, over 850,000 Jews were expelled from the Middle East leaving their belongings, their livelihood and their homes. Why doesn’t the UN recognize this fatality of justice and order reparations?

It is not an easy argument or solution, but having Muslim countries make the decision for Israel through the UN, is a dangerous precedent that appears manipulated and corrupted. And apparently, there is evidence to support this – which will be made available to the Trump White House and could make and break careers, and livelihoods as it unfolds…

Hillary – Benghazi was “nothing”

Posted on by Helena

While Hillary continues to make statements like, “It was nothing…”, and “What difference does it make…”, she obliquely shows the utterly complete lack of empathy or concern she has – and had and – will have toward human life. And that is very damaging to her campaign. Ignoring it ill not make it go away – the only thing that will make it go away is actually acknowledging it, owning it, and showing remorse for her role in what happened. Period.

Because the family and friends of those who died actually don’t think it was ‘nothing’.

The latest gaff of email correspondence involves her Muslim Brotherhood protege, Huma Abedin. Given Huma knew of the security breach in the Clinton server setup, she could be held up as an accomplice in covering up vital information and not disclosing the information to the FBI investigative authorities. Would she go to prison for Hillary? I have no doubt she would. However, if the FBI were to formally indict Clinton, while Clinton will continue to defend herself and wipe herself clean… the Democrat Party may have other ideas. As in Soros.  Will he support a losing battle?

Just as Soros was fed up with the wimpish Cameron and got rid of him, so may the tides turn on Hillary as her woes become too entrenched and high profile for the likes of Soros.

While the focus is predominantly on Soros, there is another fella worth an interesting looksee, Haim Saban. How is it that the Clinton Foundation is heavily weighted Saudi Arabia, Qatar and other middle east countries, while her largest personal campaign donor is Israeli?  An odd collaboration unless the Israeli’s are behind the Saudis…

Of course there are the Rockefellers and Rothschilds who ante up in the attempt to keep the Cabal, the oligarchy, alive and secure, also, supposedly Israeli’s.  Supposedly, in their identity is not religious, but rooted in an ideology, a banker cartel, a financial world order.

But there still remains a cache of emails that Wikileaks founder, Assange, announced this June would be leaked sometime in the future – enough to most definitely indict Clinton – if the FBI had the balls. And while Soros has been linked to the CIA, the CIA and FBI are distinct with a bit of animosity between them. So, whether the quash extends to the FBI is yet to be seen.

So could the investigation by the FBI actually create a CIA expose as well?

The adversarial conflict between the CIA and FBI dates back decades. The current Director, James Comey, is a Republican appointed by Obama. He was chosen over the preferred nomination, Lisa Monaco, who oversaw the Benghazi attack while working at the Justice Department. But Comey is not without his own Cabal having supported both McCain and Romney – known Soros advocates and friends. So, could he be influenced?

Soros has been well-known to fund both extremes, Republicans and Democrats, voicing anti-Brexit sentiment while buying hedge gold, demanding more refugee acceptance in Germany while previously blaming Germany for the influx of the hated refugees. He is not a fan of Merkel. So, could he persuade FBI Director Comey to do his bidding to protect his Presidential nominee, Hillary?

I imagine with the help of the money trail of Rothschilds, Saban, Rockefeller and more behind him, with CIA approval, Soro’s power extends far beyond our sheepish minds, and Comey is simply an easy puppet in the greater scheme of things.

Hence, Wikileaks has the proof positive, and still Hillary is ‘cleaned’. A truly sad commentary of how far askew our political ‘oligarchy’ has found reign. And how easy it is to buy a person, their values, their soul.

Will the FBI indict?

It would truly be the most honest move our government administration could make. Do they have the balls?

I am not holding my breath.