A New York Times Op-ed by Haim Saban in 2012, sums up the Obama presidency’s foreign policy with respect to Israel and Iran… In the piece Mr Saban explains how Obama is a definitive unequivocal supporter of Israel and how Iran’s nuclear capability is completely ‘off the table’. And based on these absolute facts, Mr. Saban was voting for Obama.
But then, Obama changed his mind, or he just ‘unequivocally’ lied.
Our own State Department and White House are apparently lying despite evidence that we helped orchestrate the UN vote against Israel and pro- Palestine.
Maybe Mr. Saban lied and never had any affinity for Israel… Who the heck knows anymore with the lies built on lies built on lies. It reminds me of the scientific proof-theory-hypothesis that supports evolution based on a core theory which is then dolloped with a mountain of facts and more theories to come up with a hypothesis that is labeled – Fact.
Despite the fact that Russia voted against Israel, the defiling of Israel seems oddly close to the defiling of Russia. Sanctions, inaccurate news, propaganda, destruction, and ultimately severing of economic needs.
The UN Security Council is comprised of 15 members, some of which are permanent, and some who have two year terms. The permanent members include the US, UK, France, Russia, and China, while the non-permanent rotating members include; Ukraine, Senegal, Japan, New Zealand, Malaysia, Egypt, Angola, Uruguay, Spain and Venezuela. Sixty countries have never been members of the security council.
Rife with corruption, genocide and war, Biden told Ukraine how to vote. Five of the non-permanent members term will be terminated as of December 31, 2016. Timing is everything
- Senegal is Islamic.
- “The Economist, which is owned an operated by the Globalist Rothschilds, named Uruguay “country of the year” in 2013, acknowledging the innovative policy of legalizing the production, sale and consumption of cannabis. Same-sex marriage and abortion are also legal, leading Uruguay to be regarded as one of the most liberal nations in the world, and one of the most socially developed.”
- Angola is considered in dire straits due to its humanitarian crisis, its displacement of wealth, its famine, and its authoritarian regime. Not a particularly positive country to judge another…
- Malaysia is predominantly Sunni Islam. It’s Prime Minister is Muslim and was educated in the UK. Malaysia has never recognized Israel and has condemned it from the get-go.
It is easy to see why these countries voted as they did.
New Zealand was one of the countries that ratified the appropriation of land for Israel in 1949. Their support of Israel has been unwavering since, that is until 2015 when they assigned an ambassador to Israel and the same ambassador to Palestine. Somewhat of a conflict of interest. But it would appear their vote is more out of anxiety to have an end to the conflict, than about who is right and wrong.
Again the obvious question remains, with the Jewish people being culled from most of the Middle East and the complete diaspora of land masses, ie, Saudi Arabia and Egypt, why isn’t the solution to partition a chunk of their land a solution?
Saudi Arabia is 830,000 square miles of land. By comparison, Palestine has an area of about 2100 square miles to a total area for Israel of 8000 sq miles or less than 1% of the land available to Saudi Arabia.
Since 1948, over 850,000 Jews were expelled from the Middle East leaving their belongings, their livelihood and their homes. Why doesn’t the UN recognize this fatality of justice and order reparations?
It is not an easy argument or solution, but having Muslim countries make the decision for Israel through the UN, is a dangerous precedent that appears manipulated and corrupted. And apparently, there is evidence to support this – which will be made available to the Trump White House and could make and break careers, and livelihoods as it unfolds…