Fall of Rome

Russia’s Chess Game of Peace … A Recreation of Nero?

Posted on by Helena

CHESS GAME:   Putin offers an opening to Ukraine Peace … for the fourth or fifth time. Purpose:   International Law to make a public plea.   Establish the fact that the West is NOT looking for peace but for the removal of Putin.   Reinstate the narrative that Ukraine is/was/and always will be a massively corrupt Marxist/communist regime used as the drop point headquarters for all global means of trafficking including money, children, women, slaves, sex, and drugs. As was concurred by Amnesty International and the UN just 7 years ago –

While Ukraine’s handlers have stipulated a peace deal that reads;   concede everything including those portions of Ukraine that the government has been commandeering for genocide, pay for all costs to rebuild in accordance with the city NEOM in Saudi Arabia, tear up the Minsk Agreement, concede Lake Baikal to Soros, and we’ll call it even-steven…for now, pinky swear.

The West has so lost its hand in a sty of pig excrement that they continue to declare Russia is attempting a global coup – and therefore all people must hate Russia for such an Obama-ination:

  1. WWI:   Russia’s Tzar and his entire family were executed by Bolsheviks from Germany and held an anarchical uprising to take over the country. As a result of these mostly Germanic Marxist terrorists, Russia was submerged into a winter of communism that lasted 80 years.
  2. WWII:   Soviet Russia was a western ally during the war against Nazi Hitlerism.   Post War, Eastern Russia was annexed by the US and UK and divvied into Europe. All eastern states were thus abs orbed into the EU.
  3. Reagan:   Credited with toppling the Communist Soviet Bolshevik regime that had strangled Russia, Reagan proposed further annexations of various Russian territories including Ukraine, Poland and FInland.

In the 1800’s Russia was the largest country in the world hosting 23 different ethnicities and 14 million square miles.   Over the subsequent 200 years, western nations whittled away territories halving the country to a mere 6.6 million square miles today.   Hardly representing a nation obsessed with annexation.   In fact, Russia has lost the most amount of territory of any country in the world at the hand of The West.

Today Russia is coveted for two significant resources:   Black soil and Lake Baikal.      

As a previous adjunct of Russia, Ukraine is also known for its ‘black soil’.   The best agriculture land in the world.   Soros understood this and parlayed with Reagan for his personal annexation of Ukraine in 1991.   Reagan agreed.   And now, according to Soros, he owns Ukraine.

Agenda 2030 calls for the recall of 95% of the global population via whatever means available.   But Ukraine is a mere whit of Russia – and those two assets, black soil and Lake Baikal, are necessary for the preservation of the chosen 500 million.

So much so, that the entire survival of the elite is believed to be hinged on those assets.   Yet Putin is not willing to hand over control to the Cartel and has thus become the pariah.

Two additional continents;   Africa and South America, are also subject to the elite survival.   While North America, Europe, and a host of sub-territories have no useful purpose, they do present a problem in terms of ‘uprising or anarchy’ that could stall the Cartel.

Chess Game.

Africa and South America are abundant in vast untapped resources due to communist rule for hundreds of years.   Their industrialization is literally a mini-me version only enhanced by Western influence.   In contrast, Asian countries emerged in the mid-1900’s as the copycats.   They could not create – but they could duplicate, albeit with cheaper quality and defects.     Japan was the first Asian country to emerge from the western landfill.

Brazil too is considered fertile land. However, the government enacted a law restricting foreign ownership to 25% of any municipality.   This made the land more valuable to foreign investment and set in motion a need to install a corrupt communist, Lula, in order to alleviate restrictions.

Africa is rich in diamonds, gold, sugar, salt, cobalt, uranium, oil, etc… untapped, held in corrupt communist government control, thus necessitating coups in order to capture this amalgamate of wealth.   Reining in these resources are necessary protocols to the Agenda.

In these contexts, reining in and coup are synonymous with thievery.

However, the thieves liken it to survival of the most worthy.   And therein lies the justification – no means are beyond this ‘justification’.   Including murder, assassination, genocide, thievery, glutton, greed, and fraud. Law is denied existence.

Yet still, a faction of the people still think they can fight this Agenda via systems of justice and law and order that no longer exist.

The Reality:   Elections – don’t exist. Politicians don’t rule.   Money is worthless.   And Americans still think they can come to an atomic bomb fight armed with a kitchen knife! And when we lose – gosh darn, how did that happen?

Twitter fools post such significantly banal tweets as, “who else agrees so-and-so should go to jail’, or “so-and-so should be voted out”, or “next election Trump will win”…   NO.

THAT RULE – no longer exists.

When quoting the famous nonquote, “ Nero watched while Rome Burned”, perhaps he was facing then what we are facing now – and it was completely out of his control. The infidels, the evil ones, captured the Empire and won. Nero’s attempts to prosper the Empire were usurped.

While we have recently come to understand the extent of conspiracy and fraud that has been perpetrated in enumerating our history – we still hold to the thread that our ‘ancient history’ was exactly as stipulated by the exact same corruptors…

What if – we are simply repeating the history of Nero’s Roman Empire defeat.   What if Nero was besieged by the same Cult Mafia we fight today?   What if – the Great deception is thousands of years old:   Though not mentioned by name in the Bible –  secular records identify him (Nero) as a ruthless man who began persecuting Christians.

“Secular Records”.   Creating a man.   Like modern men.   Did Nero really kill Paul and Peter or was that a Pagan insertion?   A Vatican insertion so as to create a demon and a saint?

The purpose? To recreate history to define good as evil and evil as good.

The Great Fire of Rome occurred when Paul was still trekking across the Mediterranean.   And yet – there is no mention in the Bible.   ODD.   Tacitus, born in 54 Ad was considered the source of information as to why and how Rome burned in 64. When Tacitus would have been 7.   And yet – no one questions the veracity.

We are NOT fighting a newborn evil.   We are fighting an ongoing Satan whose minions have proliferated as much as God’s Children have proliferated. The Great Deception is only in our MEDIA – which espouses evil as having control and the Fiefdom as King.  A Fake Propanda Perception of Reality.

REALITY:   We HAVE CONTROL should we wish to assert our King. The Choice IS a Matter of FAITH.

Is America Growing… or Declining Like Rome?

Posted on by Helena

Is America growing or decling like Rome?

By Paulschwartzmey

41BC, after the assassination of Julius Caesar, the Roman empire went through explosive growth. Why?

Caesar’s hand-picked successor was his nephew, Octavian. As most school children learn, Octavian attacked the renegade general Marc Antony, main squeeze of Cleopatra, took control of northern Africa and expanded his empire. But why was Egypt so important?

Octavian was named Augustus in 37BC,

but in that year, Rome had already sent 100 ships to the Red Sea. The Red Sea lanes gave the Romans a shortcut to the Arabian sea, Indian ocean and the Silk Road.

Silk wasn’t the only thing Rome imported from Asia,

though it was probably the most important. They also imported chemicals, (fragrances, embalming fluids, etc.) spices, ivory but most critical to Rome’s armies, steel.

For something to be important as an import, it must be either not available or expensive in the importer’s country, and this was especially true of silk and steel. To be sure, the Romans had silk, but to the Chinese, silk was the basis of much of their economy. After 2,000 years of minute advancements, they had refined the manufacturing process to the point where hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions of Chinese laborers were cranking out thousands of tons per year of extremely high-quality fabric that no one else in the world could replicate.

In steel, the process was even more acute. 

Roman steel was largely wrought iron, which is a low carbon form, molded into shape by heating and beating. Its low carbon content made it weak, heavy and brittle. Chinese steel could be cast into forms that were flexible, lighter and did not as easily break.

For the Romans, though, what was most important was not steel or silk, but something hardly mentioned in the texts. Branch banking.

To an empire, what you want is not important; what’s important is what you can buy. Rome could never have conquered China and taken its silk and steel. They had to buy it and to do that; they had to not only have money but move it.

Regardless of how powerful a country is, shipping gold across the seas is dangerous and expensive. The Romans, like the Greeks and Jews, solved this by using their temples as banks. Banks took in deposits and issued notes, promises written on paper in lieu of gold. If a person wanted or needed gold, they could have it, just as one who needs cash can get it from a bank, but if they don’t need it, it stays in the bank in their account. This meant the Romans did not need to continually ship gold to finance trade or construction, two things that require large amounts of money.

The Romans protected their temples with armies,

which was why locals kept their money there, but the real beauty of the steel and silk trade was Rome’s ability to tax it. The import taxes on steel and silk were as high as 25%, and the cost of these in the empire was staggering. It’s been estimated that a single bolt of Chinese silk may have cost the equivalent of 8 years of Roman wages. This gave the Romans the ability to create something that didn’t exist in 37BC. A standing army financed by wages and not plunder. Plunder may be a cheap way to finance a war, but you must keep finding new plunder.

In many ways, Bill Clinton, unwittingly, became the Octavian of his time…

though Octavian was a general and Clinton a draft dodger. Clinton’s claim to fame, (or infamy, as it may turn out) was to set the banks free. By eliminating Glass-Steagall and changing banking regulations, he set in motion a chain of events that led us to where we are today. A nation with a mammoth military financed through taxing and borrowing against trade.

Is this good or bad for America?

Like the weather, this is impossible to predict. On the one hand, the US has borrowed rivers of money. On the other, that river has bought us quite a lot. Aside from too many houses too many bars and too many malls, America has something else no one seems to notice. A gargantuan university system.
In Roman times, all roads led to Rome. The same is true here. 9 of the top 10 universities in the world and 35 of the top 50 are in the USA. Of course, you can get an education from a book, but that’s hardly the point.

A few years back, I lived inside the triangle engulfed by three universities, Harvard, MIT, and Tufts.

If you think of these institutions as places you get an education, you’re missing half the story. Harvard college is small, but its graduate school is enormous. The same is true of MIT and Tufts. The level of research going on in this triangle is staggering, and if you think it’s because of “American exceptionalism,” think again. The top students in these universities, as well as many of the professors, are from nearly every country on earth. As my daughter aptly put it when I asked her how many of her classmates in chemistry class at Wellesley were American, she said, “Just me and Eileen.”
To put this in its true perspective, America has 1,400 colleges and universities. The amount of money flowing through is probably higher than the GDP of 80% of the world’s nations. The amount of research being produced is hard to fathom, much less control.

Our Universities may be on the cusp of replacing what for 20,000 years has defined nations. Resources.

They are close to making oil obsolete. The effect on the USA is hard to fathom. Even though the price of computing has fallen by a factor of 3,000 in the last 20 years, the prices of oil and coal, on inflation-adjusted terms, have barely budged in the last 80 years. As Bill Gates once said, if the cost of transportation fell as fast as the cost of computing, you’d be able to buy a jet for what it used to cost for a neck-tie.

This has led to a one to one relationship between energy use and GDP growth. Imagine if this ratio changed by a factor of not 3,000, but just two. Imagine going from using 100 million barrels per day of oil to 50 million? It’s almost impossible to fathom. An electric car uses one-fifth the fossil fuel a gas or diesel powered auto uses. The US has 250 million vehicles!

The same is true of farmland, copper, and steel. We may be within a couple of decades of a family being able to produce almost everything they need to eat in their basements using as much energy as is created by a couple of hours on an exercise bike. In just the last two years, seed technology has raised some crop yields by 20% using the same soil and less fertilizer. Vegetables can already be grown in warehouses and can compete on a price basis with those shipped in from Mexico and sold in Walmart.

We’re close to being able to diagnose illnesses with a cell phone and where you can make love with your spouse that is 3,000 miles away in a hotel bed. We’re a decade away from being able to sit in a room and have a conversation with Einstein and your long-deceased grandmother.

Why is this important? For all of our history, the world has been ruled by empires, from the Romans to the Ottomans, the Han to the Ming, the British Empire to the USA. Imagine a world where everything you need is at your fingertips. Imagine a world where Empires no longer matter.

Is the USA declining, or, as in the case of Dinosaurs, are we becoming smaller and more sustainable?