President Biden Delegating POWER via EO’s & Memos

It appears thru a slew of recent memorandums and EO’s, Biden is transferring the powers of the President to other agencies and new Committees and councils as established via EO and Memorandums.   The purpose of which is to make the President a nonentity.  A figurehead.   Powerless. 

I suppose the rational is that Trump winning will take the role of nothingism.  OR, the purpose is anticipatory  of a major event that will render the election void – and Biden stepping aside while revoking the VP ascendancy.   While the memo’s and EO’s all state these changes in power are Constitutional – there is no supporting Constitutional Power providing for the delegation of Presidential authority to specific agencies –

Example #1:   a Pandemic erupts.   The President secures himself in the basement – and all decisions are now the authority of a New Council as created by the President with members of the Council determined by ‘NGO’s and Stakeholders…

Example #2:   a War erupts.   The President secures himself in the basement – and all decisions are now the authority of the stakeholders, the shadow government,  currently operating behind the scenes – only now they will take the stage front and center.  Martial Law.  Gulags.   Etc…

These EO’s and Memorandums are accumulating over the last few months, and will likely assume complete and authoritarian control with each successive order.   Biden does NOT appoint these Leaders – the agencies appoint them.  The agencies already operating under the thumb of the Kabbalah Cartel.

In this scenario, the military is given the authority to quell any anti-authority according to the newly indoctrinated authority – as in the Gulags.  The President and VP are permanently ‘retired’, and the shadows come out of their shadows.  No, this isn’t Obama.   It isn’t Bush.   It isn’t even Clinton.   They were all stage cast actors.   And NONE of them has any desire to be cast as the Presidential Pawn within this Agenda.  Which is why they need braindead Biden to remain at the acrimonial – HELM.

To ensure this massive coup evacuation, two Supreme Court Justices must be eliminated – Thomas and Kavannaugh.   I anticipate the frenzied attacks against these two justices will PEAK over the next two months.  These two justices stand in the way of a solidified COUP.   So, while the pundits are busily focusing on voter fraud and corruption, the true Force DeJeure is the ‘Delegation of Power’.  Which will be upheld by a liberal Supreme Court.

At this juncture, it is likely that a New Constitution will be presented under which Authoritarian Zionist Rule is coagulated under a protocol of what Netanyahu is doing in Palestine.   And The People will no longer exist.    Which would indicate that’s their assaults on Trump are really not supposed to succeed, because it isn’t necessary.   Their Agenda will be instituted BEFORE the election.

Before Trump can be relegated power.

Other countries have imposed this same sort of nonvaluable headstone wherein the President has no authority and supreme power is relegated to Prime Ministers, Monarchs, or Authoritarians.   The difference is their End Game:  The Middle East is divided between those who will support this rationale of America Coup if it aligns with their monetary goals and those preserving ethics and a form of nationalism.   Europe is essentially Communist at this point, with few exceptions, but the holdouts are gaining traction.

Putin is the most egregious of holdout which is why all military alliances converge on destroying HIM.   Xi Jinping, has been duped by America and thus is in alignment with whomever will respect China without internal interference.   That was a HUGE mistake for the Kabbalah.   Losing the China Puppet.   Thus it became necessary to vilify China instead of embracing their American allegiance.   It is an interesting play to watch our rescuers – the same countries we have been told for decades are our enemies – try to mitigate Americans out of their Rip Van Winkle doldrums of apathy.

Both Russia and China just wanted their super powers to belong to the CLUB.  The George Carlin Club – to which us ingrate peasants will never belong.   In his inimitable way, Carlin  revealed an insight it took global leaders and Americans decades to understand.   In True Carlin Form –  he joined the Air Force but was labeled an “unproductive airman” by his superiors, and received a general discharge on July 29, 1957.  Interesting bio if you have the time – Full of laughs…

Anywho – I digress.  

Biden’s delegation of authority has been in progressive mode for at least two months.  None of which have been reported by mainstream or conservative view media.   One such demonstrative Proclamation as issued by Biden was the Pardon for Certain Violations of Article 125 Under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.   Article 125 prohibits “unnatural carnal copulation” between people of the same or opposite sex, or between a person and an animal. This includes oral and anal sex, and can be accomplished by force, fraud, or consent. The maximum punishment for violating this article can include a dishonorable discharge, life imprisonment, and loss of pay and allowances.”

It is notable that Israel claims to be the global capital of exactly this carnal copulation and has openly called for those who subsist on this moral to move to Israel where you will be embraced and can freely exploit these tendencies…upon whoever and whatever you want.  Family dogs, cats, deer, babies … whatever is your fetish.

SO when evangelicals like Macarthur & Piper, and Popes like Francis, and the thousands who have raped young boys and girls align….  THIS is their common theme – support the Zionist Cartel, their shadow Government, their trafficking in Children,  Human Organs, Sex Slaves, Labor, etc…, the source is – ISRAEL>    

5 thoughts on “President Biden Delegating POWER via EO’s & Memos

  1. Did the Russian Ukraine war explode because Putin concluded that Russia must invade and conquer Ukraine before the Biden government permitted it to join the NATO alliance?

    Pelosi assumed that as Speaker of the House she should intervene in Taiwan. When has the Speaker of the House assumed the role of directing American foreign policy? Never. The same equally applies to her attempt to impeach Trump to permit the Ukraine into the Nato alliance.

    Abuse of power, Obstruction of Congress a red herring to remove Trump who opposed Ukraine’s joining the Nato alliance. No other Speaker of the House has undertaken a foreign policy initiative like Nancy Pelosi’s 2022 trip to Taiwan, which was seen as a direct challenge to the U.S. government’s official “One China” policy.

    The Speaker of the House is part of the legislative branch and does not have the same constitutional authority over foreign policy as the President, who leads the executive branch. Historically, Speakers have generally avoided taking high-profile foreign policy actions that could undermine or contradict the President’s role as the nation’s chief diplomat.

    Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan happened without the explicit backing of the Trump administration at the time. This was seen as a significant departure from the typical deference the Speaker of the House has shown to the President’s leadership on foreign policy matters. While Speakers have occasionally made foreign trips or issued statements on international issues, Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan appears to be the most direct and confrontational intervention by a Speaker in recent memory. No other comparable instances where a Speaker has so directly sought to shape U.S. foreign policy in this way, independent of the executive branch.

    President Trump could have legally arrested Nancy Pelosi for “encroaching upon the office of the President” due to her trip to Taiwan. The Speaker of the House is a separate and co-equal branch of government, and has certain foreign policy prerogatives that are distinct from the President’s role as commander-in-chief and chief diplomat. While Pelosi’s visit was seen by some as overstepping her authority and undermining the President’s foreign policy, it did not necessarily constitute a clear-cut usurpation of the Presidency.

    Unless Pelosi’s actions rose to the level of criminal activity like obstruction of justice or abuse of power, the President would have faced significant legal and political obstacles in trying to arrest her. The separation of powers and system of checks and balances in the U.S. government make it very difficult for the President to simply arrest or detain a co-equal branch leader on such grounds.

    The issue of Ukraine’s potential NATO membership was a major geopolitical flashpoint in the years leading up to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022. However, the specific positions of these Democratic congressional leaders on this issue were not widely reported or emphasized by the corrupt MSM Pravda propaganda Press. Democratic congressional leaders like Pelosi, Schiff, and Nadler regarding Ukraine’s potential NATO membership, the “MSM” or “Pravda propaganda Press” omitted reporting on, nor emphasized the specific stances taken by these figures on this geopolitical issue in the years leading up to the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine.

    Did Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff, and Jerry Nadler actively opposed President Trump’s position on Ukraine’s potential NATO membership. The period from January 2021 through the Democrats’ loss of their Congressional majority, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine occurred before Ukraine was able to join NATO.

    Pelosi, Schiff, and Nadler likely opposed Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and supported efforts by the Biden administration to arm the Ukrainian resistance. This was in contrast to the Trump administration’s previous stance on Ukraine’s NATO membership.

    The fact that Ukraine had not yet joined NATO prior to the invasion meant Russian troops were not directly on the NATO border, which likely factored into Russia’s decision to launch the invasion. The historical precedent of invasions through Ukraine’s flat terrain also seems to have influenced Russia’s calculus.

    The Biden administration’s support for arming the Ukrainians after the invasion suggests they were willing to take a firm stand against Russian aggression, even if Ukraine was not yet a NATO member.
    Given President Biden’s reported mental health challenges, it’s reasonable to infer that Pelosi and other Democratic leaders may have played a more central role in shaping American foreign policy towards Ukraine and Russia during this period.

    The failure of the Lame Stream media propaganda press to explore in more depth these critical issues, why has the MSM have no accountability like the 3+ years Rachel Maddow Russia-gate slanders? The media, outlets like MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow and the broader “mainstream media” (MSM), have often faced limited accountability for inaccurate or one-sided coverage, particularly around the “Russiagate” allegations during the Trump presidency.

    The obvious lack of in-depth investigative journalism in favor of character assassination Ad hominem defines the emotion laden Opinion slanted US News. Media outlets have agendas that lead them to emphasize certain narratives over others, or downplay information that doesn’t fit their preferred framing. Media outlets clearly prioritize coverage that is more sensational or aligns with their target audience’s prejudices & preconceptions, rather than pursuing deeper, more contextual reporting. Journalists cowardly refuse aggressive questions or criticize “their teams” political officials and government agencies they rely on for information and access.

    Federal bureaucracies like the FBI, CIA, NSA, Secret Service, the Industrial Military Complex etc play a far more dominant role than elected Officials in the US American government today. When Congressmen and Senators seek Bureaucrats to testify over questionable policies, like the attempted assassination of Trump, these bureaucrats arrogantly behave as if they have absolutely no accountability before American elected officials.

    The idea that these unelected bureaucratic agencies may be wielding outsized influence and operate with limited accountability to elected officials is certainly a serious issue worth examining. When Congressional representatives try to exercise oversight and question bureaucrats about controversial policies or actions, those bureaucrats can almost always respond in an arrogant or uncooperative manner, as if they are not beholden to the elected officials. This erosion of accountability to the American people’s elected representatives is troubling for the functioning of a healthy democratic system.

    The lack of sufficient congressional oversight mechanisms or political will that reins in unaccountable behavior, the excuses of revealing sensitive information related to national security and intelligence just don’t fly. The growth and entrenched power of large federal agencies has perverted the American democracy into a Czarist bureaucratic autocracy! The growth and entrenchment of power within all federal bureaucracies, together with their Government Established Corporate monopolies – like the Federal Reserve – has indeed created a dangerous dynamic, where these agencies have become increasingly insulated from meaningful democratic oversight and control by elected officials and even the President. This undermines the core principles of American democracy. Its establishes a hidden Government behind the democratically elected government.

    The lack of robust congressional oversight and the entrenched power of federal bureaucracies have indeed created a deeply concerning dynamic that undermines the core principles of American democracy. The excuses around protecting national security information are often used as a pretext to avoid real accountability. These agencies cannot be allowed to hide behind that justification to evade oversight from the elected representatives of the people.

    This SWAMP “Czarist bureaucratic autocracy” highlights how these unelected agencies have accumulated so much power and influence that they have essentially established a “hidden government” that operates independently of the democratically elected leadership. This critically severe threat to the foundations of American democracy. The growth and entrenchment of these federal bureaucracies, insulated from meaningful oversight and control, fundamentally subverts the balance of power that is essential for a healthy democratic system. This Bureaucratic SWAMP Autocracy dynamic undermines the core principles of self-governance and representation that the United States was founded upon. It is a profoundly undemocratic development that must be confronted and addressed through robust reforms to restore proper democratic accountability.

    Key CIA, FBI, NSA, Secret Service & Democratic congressional leaders like Pelosi, Schiff, and Nadler regarding Ukraine’s NATO membership and the US response to Russia’s invasion sought to overthrow President Trump from Office. Twice they attempted to impeach him to advance their political agendas. The relationship between the executive branch, intelligence/law enforcement agencies, and Congress can be a delicate and at times contentious one, especially when there are strong partisan divides. Allegations of attempts to undermine or remove a sitting president are extremely serious claims that would require substantial evidence to substantiate.

  2. We are standing on the precipice of losing our nation to tyranny. Pastor Chuck Baldwin clearly stated that “We are on a battlefield and how we conduct ourselves as soldiers will determine our outcome.”

    Joe Biden does not control the narrative. Neither will Donald Trump. We are being led by the Pied Piper, a chameleon. What will we do about it?

    • Biden signed the orders. Trump has not, and will never, sign such orders. There is no equivalence between the 2. No one has complete control of everything.

Leave a Reply