The liberal Rothschild darling Economist Magazine has declared that Big Governments across the globe are growing ever bigger while effectively destroying their economies. Forecasting; “government spending will be greater as a share of GDP in 2026 than it was in 2006 in every major advanced economy.” While decrying America’s $1.8trillion ‘infrastructure’ spending will ‘expand its welfare state”, the charges to corrupt ALL Government is the game-plan. Ultimately crippling the US as the last Tango.
The fact that these countries are run by the Rothschild’s et al, eludes the article. But its timing is critical as government popularity across all major countries is plummeting precipitously. Opening the door to a replacement. What oh what could that be??
Italy, Greece and Austria have imposed lockdown on all unvaccinated persons. Australia’s Morrison has fiendishly declared that the unvaccinated will not have a life. Germany’s 2828 CoVid patients are now responsible for CRISIS mode and new lockdowns amidst a population of over 80 million. All while spending and inflation are tanking everything middle class.
To emphasize that factoid, The Economist conducted a YouGov Poll across Europe and found that ‘populism’ as in the people come first vs. the elite, is waning. But the poll isn’t a true poll, it is a survey of 1085 people with no demographic details associated whatsoever. And in fact, the survey end result revealed ‘net agrees and net disagrees’ totaling 70%+/- with upwards of 40% claiming they don’t know or don’t have an opinion. If the survey demographics change – the survey results will too. HELLO!
But then, of course polls, surveys and trackers have a singular purpose as always – to sway the sheep. The mindless followers who will blindly submit to the illusion without question. Other YouGov trackers showed upwards of 90% of those anonymous persons who submit to the survey/tracker felt masks should be a compulsory law inside, outside, and everywhere in-between. AH!
The Economist creates these impressions for a purpose – they are NOT arbitrary.
So why would the Rothschild’s of the world want populism to die?
What is the opposite of Populism? According to Merriam-Webster Dictionary: definition of populist: a believer in the rights, wisdom, or virtues of the common people. So the opposite would be a non-believer in the rights, wisdom, or virtues of the common people.
An erosion of ‘for the people’ would be the return of monarchial rule for the elite.
What might that look like in today’s society?
Forget History – Let’s Look at the Current Dictatorial Regimes –
UAE: The population of the UAE is 9.5 million. Roughly 90% of the population is imported slaves, and the remaining 10% are the ruling class elite. The ratio of females to males is 1-2.2 males. 35% of the elite population is obese, education is provided for emirates only, it is considered a tax haven for the wealthy, migrant workers live in squalor, paychecks are scarce, and abuse is rampant. Female workers are typically sexually abused.
Workers live in houses that are occupied as bunkhouses with a common kitchen. The pay for a construction worker ‘pre-CoVid’ was roughly $1000 per month. Every member of a family must separately apply for a temporary work visa. Migrants may not bring families unless they are sponsored. Migrants over 50 are considered unemployable.
The vast majority of jobs for the UAE citizens are in government, police, and military. Given the education system is poor, citizens study abroad if they have the wealth. Most professional jobs, oil & gas, real estate, business & finance, are given to expats.
In such countries the police work exclusively on behalf of the elite and anyone deemed to have crossed an invisible line will be left homeless, jobless, jailed, tortured, and their passport confiscated. Sharia Law is the justice system. Rape is considered a crime wherein the female is punished, flogged and jailed for reporting the crime. Amputation and crucifixion are means of punishment.
The purpose of the military is simply to keep national order and to intervene in skirmishes that the government feels threatens their wealth.
A local government is selected by the elite with roles that are mostly superficial under the Ruling Sheikhs.
They are aligned with the UN.
This is the system envisioned by our media via our shadow government. Politicians who support this monarchial totalitarian ‘democracy’ are busily garnering as much wealth as possible so as to make the coveted seat in the tier of elite.
While the ‘worker class’ citizen has already been finely tuned around the world in large corporations such as Wal-Mart, Amazon, Kroger, etc… the full institution of worker bees has yet to be reinvented at the desired wage class. The militaries across Europe are nonexistent, the police have been comprised as is evident in Australia, France and Germany, and the US military is now being siphoned within the guise of Lloyd Austin, a General whose career is the fluff pillows are made of to name ships instead of build defense!
Corralling the Sheep is the job of The Economist whose influence is over every single liberal media outlet worldwide. The next phase will determine the outcome of global Regimes – The People – and the few or the many who will RESIST!
2 thoughts on “The ECONOMIST: Big Government Is Destroying Global Economies…”
well Helena,if they come at me with a mop,it will be sticking out their asses.
My MUSE had imparted this bit of wisdom :
“First the boast, then the humiliation.”
I’ve been confronted by the Agency, after
I’d explained what 9/11 was actually to
accomplish, in just one week after that
false flag—“they won.”
Got your note, Helena,—thank you !