saudi arabia

Huma Abedin – Our Next President

Posted on by Helena

By default – when Hillary is ‘confused’~

Imam Zain al A’abedin. Huma Abedin. Jordan Zain Weiner. Zain Endeavors, LLC.

Huma Abedin’s profile is about as transparent as Obama’s school record.

Little known and even less proven. There are no family photos, in fact no photos of Huma prior to her affiliation with Hillary. She does not openly declare if she is Sunni or Shiite, and while her mother is a vocal advocate of Sharia Law and all it’s implications including female genitalia mutilation, stoning, and lashings, Huma is silent. While no one attacks Ms Abedin’s intellect, her heritage and affiliations do seem a bit problematic.

Huma Abedin’s father was Syed Zainul Abedin. He is considered to be a direct descendant of Khawaja Moinuddin Chishti. Chishti, an Imam and scholar is said to be a direct descendant of Muhammad. The name Syed (including different spellings) is used specifically to denote a descendant relationship with Muhammad. Does that make Huma a descendant of Muhammad by her father?  Is her ‘seed’ being positioned in the World Order?

The name Jordan in ancient Aramaic means, ‘one who descends’. Zain means, beautiful one’. While Huma’s father was Shiite, her mother is Sunni. Articles continually point out that Huma’s mother is connected to The Muslim Brotherhood, an organization that is apparently embraced by the US, but has been decried a terrorist organization in Saudi Arabia where Huma was raised. Being found to support them financially or in any ideological manner is punishable by prison for a period no less than 3 years and no more than 20.

But the Saudis have had a vibrant friend/foe relationship with The Muslim Brotherhood over the years, with the terrorist label slapped on just this past 2014, and a new claim of alliance being rumored today.

That being said, how is it even conceivable that Huma, her siblings and her mother are not in jail if in fact they are related to The Muslim Brotherhood? Her mother teaches at a tiny girls school in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia and Huma has visited the country since her enshrinement with Hillary, all without incident. Could it be that her lineage is her salvation and protection?  And why Hillary?  Easily, she is the perfect conduit, the patsy, the puppet.  Hillary is a stage.  The play – is much more complicated.

The predominant reason the Saudis don’t like the Muslim Brotherhood is that they consider them a threat to their supremacy and monarchical rule because the Brotherhood adheres to a more revolutionary front of Sunni Islam.

In the early years of Assad rule in Syria, he was considered an ally of the US by the CIA, various military intelligence divisions, and the FBI, for his invaluable information regarding al-Qaeda. In fact, the information he supplief was considered the best and his relationship with the US was hailed!

What prompted his alliance?  He believed that The Muslim Brotherhood was an off-shoot of al-Qaeda and The Brotherhood was attempting to infiltrate Syria calling for a Sunni uprising and jihad. Attempting to eradicate the jihad threat, thousands of Brotherhood members were killed. But when Rumsfeld demand ed that Assad give over Hezbollah in return for help against The Brotherhood,  Assad refused having a moral alliance with Hezbollah.   And Rumsfeld turned.

Who exactly is Hezbollah?  Hezbollah was initially formed as a para-military unit of about 1500 men organized by Iran to combat the Israeli takeover of southern Lebanon.  In other words, they were created and organized to battle the invasion and takeover of a portion of  Lebanon by Israel.

The turvy world then propped up Assad for destruction because he was not willing to bend to the corruption and thus his country was thrown into rubble, with The Muslim Brotherhood as the ‘good guy’ and Hezbollah as a terrorist organization.  What evolved from this deception was a boatload of anger.

Not sayin’ I support one or the other, just observing:

So, why do we, the US, cater to The Muslim Brotherhood despite their open claim agenda for world Islamification? They are considered by some as the parallel of Hitler’s Nazi’s. In Arabic, The Brotherhood is called, Ikhwan, a group that openly collaborated with Hitler, assassinated Anwar Sadat, and employs Malik Obama, President Obama’s brother. They support Erdogan, created Hamas, created CAIR, and are said to be affiliated with ISIS. The finger pointedly points to the Obama regime. In 2010, he began a crusade in support of The Muslim Brotherhood, in support of Sharia Law, to the dismay of Egypt, and Libya as in Benghazi.  And to the dismay of many within the US.  As in, “what the hey!!!!!%^&I*$#…”

So where does Huma fit into this profile? There is a precept within Sharia called, ‘maruna’ that advocates lying and false impersonation as a valid doctrine of faith. This doctrine is widely accepted as a means of sowing division and confusion – by The Muslim Brotherhood. Hence, Huma’s very odd marriage to a jewish man, in complete contradiction to the values instilled by her Sharia Law mother. Perhaps he was the unwitting shill, the man who followed his lust instead of his values and morality. He was easy.  And perhaps the vow Huma has for Hillary, knowing that her innate’ confused mind’ will ultimately lay the table for a a Huma dictatorship.  As she is really the ‘man’ in control.

Is the abdication of the ‘confused’ Hillary simply a precursor to the potential rule of Abedin as her most trusted and loyal advisor. Is Hillary the real pawn and the betrayal a play waiting to happen? Is Abedin raising her child to be the new messiah within the lineage of Muhammad? Is that her coronation? IS that what gives her and her mother the ability to reign within Saudi Arabia despite their Muslim Brotherhood connection?

When Truth and Transparency are hidden, it is not surprising that questions arise…

When Truth and Transparency are exposed, it is not surprising that there is nothing – to talk about.

ISIS War Shifts As Turkey Emboldened

Posted on by Helena

Short Term Memory Loss. There are a few Biblical expressions that warn against ego, pride, condemnation and slander; Matthew 7:3 – “Why do you look at the speck that is in your brother’s eye but do not notice the log that is in your own eye?” And again in 7:5 – “You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the peck from your brother’s eye.”

British History: The Brits have a long history of torture, punitive horrors, brutality and murder. Australia was formed as a result of the British expelling their debtors to a life of horror on a remote island. The United States was formed a a result of a revolt against the tyranny of the English Empire. Ireland saw two thirds of its population sold into slavery by the British. Kings beheaded their wives, public executions were commonplace. Violence in the form of murder and manslaughter was more common than accidental death. Women were burned to death on stakes. Society was built on the class of the Monarchs vs the peasants. Children were beaten and sold.

It was just 100 years ago that women were allowed to vote, but only those over the age of 30. Of course it should be noted that life expectancy was around 50 at that time and maternal death rates were about 2%. There were over 41 wars/conflicts that the Brits were involved in during the 20th century alone, including five with Ireland and three with Germany.

At the beginning of the 20th century, 25% of Brits lived in poverty, women were not allowed to work, 15% were living at subsistence levels and unemployment was extremely high and the disparity between the ultra rich and everyone else was extreme. Asians began to migrate to England and became the largest ethnic diversity. Between 1991 and present time, the ethnic diversity has more than tripled.

The Royal Family has a staff of 436. They run an annual tab of about 35.7 million pounds, or $53.8 in dollars. A report by the Institute For Fiscal Studies estimated the poverty level as of 2014 at 23.2%.

The point?

Former soldier, Ambassador to Afghanistan and Bosnia, and former UK Democratic Leader, Lord Paddy Ashton, has opened the dyke and is questioning the UK’s involvement in the funding support of ISIS. He specifically mentions Saudi Arabia and Qatar and the ongoing collaboration and friendship the UK enjoys with these countries. He is calling for an investigation into this matter given that the UK has denounced any military action against ISIS thus raising questions about the UK sympathies.  Are they enemy or friend?

Today the MIddle East tensions rose significantly higher as Turkey downed a Russian fighter jet and Syrian rebels, the same rebels that the US gives ammunition and weapons to, assassinated the pilots as they attempted to parachute down. An action that could propel Turkey into the midst of the war and escalate the entire situation, it is an important shift.

The 10 trillion dollar question? Who is on what side?

Why would the US care whether Russia says it has hit 1000 targets or 500? Does it really matter?  Why is this headlines?  Is this a game?  Are we really keeping score with allies?  Have we lost our marbles?!!

Or has this ISIS war become an ego match and nothing more?  Why is Obama meeting with Hollande and not all allies to bring forth a plan of action? Why are Canada and Australia silent? Apparently Canada is using the French escalation in attacks as justification to hide and whimper. They fear that if they do anything ISIS will retaliate and so they are willing to allow ISIS to grow and engorge and murder without consequence. They cower and think somehow this will make them immune. Canada talks about Assad and Putin and Iran as though they are the orchestrators when in fact Saudi Arabia, the US, the UK and Germany were the initial provocateurs. Only recently was Russia asked for its help by the US. And Iran has remained out of the fray. Canada – shame on you!

And where is Germany? Bringing in a million refugees and demanding everyone else bring in their quota according to Merkel’s admonition.  No matter the fake passports, the falsified documents, the ISIS infiltrators, just ignore those small, miniscule abnormalities…  But now, as a result of the Paris attacks, the champion of Europe, Germany, is beginning to loose it’s glow, and the EU is dividing rapidly. Who will come to the forefront? Who will choose sides with whom?

In the topsy-turvishness of this world we may see France rising, Germany falling prey to the ISIS they invited, and the war engulfing more borders than we can fathom. We may see the US asking Iran for help. China for help. While the allies we thought were our friends cower and the countries we decried and demonized as having logs in their eyes we find to be mere specks….and a shift occurs.

Weapons – Here, There and Everywhere

Posted on by Helena

The US keeps giving away weapons to just about anyone asking. Unfortunately, it appears we frequently give them to countries that we think are or might be an ally, only to find that we go to war with that country at some future date – against our own weapons.

The latest is of course, Iraq.

In 1982 the US armed Saddam Hussein in Iraq’s fight against Iran. Iraq instigated the war with Iran. It is estimated that anywhere from ½ million to one million people died in that war. Another ½ million became permanent invalids. Over $228 billion was spent and the end result was over $400 billion in damage. The war included indiscriminate missile attacks on cities and civilians. It included the extensive use of chemical weapons. The major sources of the chemicals were DOW Chemical, and the US Department of Commerce. The US, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait aided Saddam Hussein.

The end of this war led to the Gulf War. Saddam Hussein ordered the invasion of Kuwait this time. The same country that had been an ally against Iran. Of course, this time the US was on the side of Kuwait – fighting against weapons provided to Saddam by the US in the 1980’s. The precipitating factor – oil. Saddam thought that Kuwait and the Saudis were siphoning his oil and therefore wanted to cancel out a $30 billion debt. Saudi Arabia ‘asked’ the US for military intervention. This time, weapons were given to Kuwait. Chemical weapons used by Iraq against Iran are now being used against US military.

Upwards of 30% of the weapons provided to Iraq could not be accounted for. It is presumed they found their way to various terrorist factions, including ISIS.

The Afghanistan war found our US military facing off against weapons provided to them during the 1980’s when we allied with them against the Soviets.

IN 2008, the US supplied weapons to Uganda and Burundi, half of which ended up in the hands of Al-Shabaab. Al-Shabaab is a jihadist terrorist group that has pledged allegiance to Al-Qaeda.

In 2012, weapons sent to Qatar and the UAE ended up in the hands of Islamic militants in Libya.

Weapons sent to Syria in support of the rebels fighting against Asad ended up in the hands of ISIS, including weapons parachuted into the country meant for the Kurds.

And now Iraq’s Prime Minister is seeking a ‘sustainable flow of weapons’ from the US with payment ‘deferred’ given the oil price crisis has damaged their economy.

It would seem that we do not learn from our past mistakes, instead we insist that this time … ‘they promised’. In fact we supply quite a hefty load of weapons to Middle East countries including:

UAE $3.7billion

Turkey $2.3billion

Afghanistan $1.06billion

Egypt $976million

Iraq $916million

Saudi Arabia $1billion

Oman $130million

Kuwait $107million

And the list goes on ad nauseam.

When these weapons turn up in the hands of El Nusra, Al Shabaad, Al Qaeda, ISIS, and even Boko Haram, suddenly everyone is mute. US weapons in the hands of Al-Qaeda in Yemen brings shrugs and California valley girl, ”whatever’s’. The oops factor.

Who has nuclear weapons? Russia, China, UK, US, France, Pakistan, India, and Israel are known to possess nuclear weapons. It is a possibility that North Korea, and Iran have a bomb. Countries that have nuclear weapon fuel Kazakhstan, Germany, The Netherlands, Canada, Belgium, Belarus, Japan, Italy, Poland and South Africa.

Saudi Arabia has signed a pact with Pakistan that it will fund their nuclear development and in return Pakistan will provide the Saudis with nuclear warheads. Other Middle East countries pursuing nuclear power include; Turkey, UAE, Jordan, Egypt, Kuwait, Algeria, and Morocco.

Are we concerned?