cancer treatment

CANCER: Big Pharma Cure = Big Pharma Death

Posted on by Helena

In case you missed it, Biden is going to ‘cure cancer’.   Apparently, NASA would be the venue for curing cancer given that cancer cells age faster in zero gravity.   Over the next 25 years NASA and Biden are going to work together to find a way to cut cancer deaths in half.   Which means they are not looking for a cure, they are looking for the next generation of Big Pharma with 36 debilitating side effects including a painful death.

The fact that the NASA space station will be disassembled by 2030 due to aging components with no alternative presently in place, is classic government jaundice in demanding more spending on NASA now.  The fact that Biden’s noncure Big Pharma gravity treatment is hopefully onboard sometime in 2050 when Biden is 107 is also not discussed.  However, Merck and NASA are onboard for more funding from Taxpayers to research this noncure and build a private space station on behalf of Merck which is currently sitting on $110 billion in assets that it holds for funzies.

Full disclosure – I was recently diagnosed with my second bout of breast cancer.  The first time I had a biopsy 15 years ago they used a drill bit which like concrete drills splatters the fine particles – everywhere.   At the time, I thought it was pretty stupid, but that was the Protocol.   As a result, minutiae cancer cells were spread all over which requires radiation – which causes cancer.

There is no cure available.   It is all about hope, faith, a good surgeon, and avoiding doctors as much as possible.  That hasn’t changed.   I found the cancer.  I told them it was cancer.   But I am a patient, therefore doctors prevail.   I was required to have a mammogram.   Why?  Because that’s the best first course.   Second course is an ultrasound.   Why?   Because it can pinpoint better than a mammogram.   Third course is an MRI.  Why?   Because the mammogram and ultrasound don’t really do much.   Then the biopsy.   Then the diagnosis.   Oh – you have cancer.   At this point you want to slap everyone silly.

When having the MRI, I had to sign away on the dye they use ‘approved’ by the FDA in 1988.   After signing, I looked up the side effects at home and of course Mayo and NIH were not thrilled – One of the many toxic side effects is gadolinium poisoning which deposits toxins in your ‘brain’.   In fact, there is a class-action lawsuit making the rounds…   The FDA reaction?   Provide a warning label –

Solution?  Tell your techs you are allergic to everything.  I wish I had.  Best way to detox your kidney;   apple cider vinegar, lemon juice, basil, dates and dandelion.

My first line of research was to find the best surgeon.   I searched reviews and read the good and the bad.   The problem came when trying to find which hospital your best choice surgeon was connected with.   In Colorado, the highest review for a hospital was 3.2 stars and slid toward hell from there.  The quality of hospitals fell dramatically during Covid.   The primary reason?   Everyone quit.  As a result you have burger flippers working hospital shifts with art degrees in basketweaving.

Turbo-Cancer is the new freefall for the CoVid multi-vaxed (not me).   Most adverse events are associated with Pfizer.   Despite the vast connection between the vax and cancer, the CDC and National Cancer Institute urge all patients to get their boosters.   The CDC is adamant that there is no proof of turbo cancer association with the vax, that there is no proof that the vax alters DNA, and that Vaccines have been shown to decrease the risk of hospitalization and death from COVID-19, even among people with cancer.  Odd.   Where is this study?  There is none.  NADA.

According to the CDC algorithm, there are 1.9 million new cancer diagnoses every year, of which 610,000 will die.  32% of cancer patients die each year.   Not a good statistic.

Breast, colon and pancreatic cancer rates are increasing at concerning rates among America’s young adults, “a new study finds – Open Jama Network”.   Although the CDC can find no possible relationship as to why, they are quite adamant this upward trajectory has nothing to do with the vax and instead chalk it up to obesity, smoking and alcohol.  When science was confronted with the fact that this increased trend also was occurring in Asian countries where obesity and alcohol trends are unchanged, they decided it must be “Climate Change”.  Based on ZERO evidence.  Science at its finest…

The wave of biotech layoffs in 2024 is predicted to continue its 2023 trajectory.   So far, 5 companies have announced layoffs as severe as 95%.   Pfizer’s vaccine R&D site in New York is expected to sayonara roughly 30% of its workforce by mid February.   The problems Big Pharma face include the toxic agents added to natural cures.   A natural cure cannot by definition be patented.   But with the addition of toxic agents into the natural magic cure – a patent is viable – however, the magic tends to disappear and leave just the toxic agents causing multiple death sentences.

One such curative developed by Dr. Bradstreet in 2008 was GcMAF.  Unfortunately, the Big Pharma industry, specifically, Glaxo-Smith Kline, was sued by Bradstreet in his claim that their vaxes caused his son to acquire Autism.   In researching a cure for his son, Bradstreet stumbled upon a naturally occurring D based protein that he found deficient in cancer patients.   When infused with this protein, Bradstreet claimed he was curing cancer over a 3-4 month period at a cost of about $100 per month to the patient.

Highly unacceptable, GSK ordered Bradstreet shut down, his work, vials, papers confiscated, and his life suicided – 2015.  When GSK and other Pharma’’s attempted to insert their toxins into Bradstreet’s protein cure so to make it patentable – the protein no longer worked and the concept was scrapped and filed in the dungeon of ALL CURES under the Vatican…   ok – I made up that last part, but it sounds plausible.

While herbal medicines have been used for cancer treatment for 4500 years, ancient medicinal cures for tumors was to cauterize the tumors if close to the skin.   One herbal remedy utilized extensively in ancient medicine was ‘wormwood’, which was a mainstay for thousands of years and was an ingredient in Absinthe.   Wormwood’s prohibition in the US and Europe coincides with the formation of the Rockefeller Institute in 1901.  The Institute was dominant in calling all ancient cures quackery in favor of the toxic pharmacology today we call Big Pharma.

Personally, I think I’m going to make a tincture trip to Sprouts and buy some wormwood!!

Chemo Sensitivity and Cancer Treatment – Healthcare vs Pharma!

Posted on by Helena

Big News For Breast Cancer: a new test can determine whether chemotherapy will have any valuable effect on your type of cancer!

We have medical experts on board, medical centers, cancer centers, National Cancer Institute, etc…, etc…, etc… It is news! And it’s big…

But wait a minute!  What the Heck!  While NIH and various medical professionals are patting their backs in self-approval ratings, there is another agenda…   Chemo sensitivity tests have been used for over a decade in Germany and Greece. This is not new at all, it is only new in that the US is jumping on the bandwagon. It’s not a medical breakthrough, it’s not unique, it’s an old test that is making a media splash.

The test costs about $4000 which insurance companies will absorb, after your deductible and co-pay, which for most is now so ridiculously high a new wave of bankruptcy’s are sure to hit the economy.

So, why did we wait? Why didn’t we allow this test to be conducted in the US? Why subject thousands and thousands of people to the horrific debilitating effects of chemo, when the end result will be no better than if they had resorted to other methods? Why haven’t chemo methods improved their targeting? Why do we rely on old failing methods despite billions and billion pumped into the pharmaceutical industry and the cancer research industry?

Because there was profit to be made in chemo. And now insurers are fighting this cost as it continues to rise. Insurers don’t want to pay. According to a report put out by Kaiser June 2014, when hospitals began buying up doctor’s practices, chemo costs rose because physicians were deemed outpatient clinics and could charge more for overhead. Independent doctors charged less, but as hospitals greed outpaced insurers pocketbooks, the insurers became peeved. In fact, in a 2013 study chemo given by independent doctors cost 53% less than chemo at outpatient centers operated by hospitals.

It got to the point where Wellpoint, an insurer, offered oncologists a $350 bonus to NOT prescribe chemo. With cancer rising to pandemic levels, insurers were frantically looking for ways to reduce costs, and chemotherapy was one culprit averaging anywhere from $6000 to $150,000 per one course of treatment. But that was just for the chemo, the pharma industry was making bank not just on the chemo but on all the added prescriptions that were given to alleviate side effects.

In fact, the drug industry pushed for more and more physicians to recommend chemo and chemo drugs until the insurer finally said – enough! It is estimated that the cost of cancer care alone in the US will top near or over $200 billion per year as of 2020. As of 2010, 40% of Medicare spending was for oncology drugs. And while cancer drugs double and triple in cost, while patients being prescribed chemo has continued to rise, the rate of cancer continues to increase and the cure of cancer is more and more a distant fantasy.

In Canada, more and more utilization of naturopathic clinics are on the rise, including cancer alternative centers. The concept is that by using more and more drugs we have taken away or reduced the bodies natural self healing immune system. These clinics utilize a patient specific therapy program that includes the chemosensitivity test. Just as new information suggests that breast cancer could result from a bovine virus, the naturopathic clinics focus on detoxing ones system and rebuilding immunity to fight cancer cells.

I remember getting a biopsy for cancer. Using a drill to biopsy a lump, not unlike a jack-hammer, the process basically sprays the cancer throughout your body as the drill punches a hole in the lump. The sprayed cancer cells then drift throughout your body, lodging wherever they can be comfortable so as to grow – and multiply. But if your immune system is trained to eradicate these damaged cells, then invasive treatments are not needed – and the pharma industry has a hissy fit.

Since we know that chemo absolutely destroys your entire immune system thereby making you MORE susceptible to cancer and other diseases, and radiation therapy can actually ’cause cancer’, alternatives are an option that other countries find more useful, less costly, and with greater success rates.

So this “NEW” method for detecting chemo sensitivity – it’s not new, it’s been used for over a decade in other countries, it’s use in the US is a direct mandate of insurers not willing to pay the exorbitant chemo costs upcharged by hospitals, and the media would have us believe that all our trillions spent on cancer research has had some impact – when it is middlin’ at best.