A Just Russia

The Economist Economy in the Revised New World Order

Posted on by Helena

The Economist:   “The property industry has a huge carbon footprint. Here’s how to reduce it.   Some buildings should be retrofitted, others torn down.”     The first criteria for accomplishing this is to vacate large cities.   The means?   Escalate crime and destruction to such levels living in a city is unsustainable.   Chaos.   The only ones left in the city will be criminals.   Stores will have been abandoned.  Broken glass, ransacked interiors…   And cities will be razed for Phase II of western Agenda.   Where will the criminals go?

CoVid emptied nursing homes.    No one was charged with negligent death.   The Old and aged – eliminated.   The middle and upper classes – forced to move for safety reasons.   And the only ones left are the poor and the criminals.   Mostly black.   Not a racist observation – simply a fact of the means to achieve the purpose.

The Economist:   “The Tricky Reconstruction of Global Supply Chains”.   According to the Rothschilds, ‘resilience is dangerous’.   If it wasn’t for the Pandemic and the war in Ukraine, globalization faced extinction.   But as a result of these two manufactured agendas of chaos, The Economist  asserts that reimagining global capitalism through corporate stakeholders in boardrooms can now be achieved!   Further, the Marxists declare that supply chains have emptied what was $9 trillion in inventory to $-0-.

The Economist declared that Ukraine MUST be made a member of the European Union.   The criteria for any country to join is:   a free market economy, a stable democracy and rule of law, a democratic governance and human rights, a functioning market economy, and the acceptance of ALL EU legislation.

NONE of the criteria is met by Ukraine.   Yet Ursula von der Leyden bows to her Masters and has reiterated The Economist demand.

Meanwhile the anti-christ, Zelenskyy, is calling for western nations to go to war with China over Taiwan…   Zelenskyy is Soros’ nonbiological 6th child – in soul only.

Meanwhile…   in a tit-for-tat, Russia and Nicaragua have joined military forces and will have joint air and sea drills from July thru December.   The triangle of Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela could have consequences for the US.   Adding Russia is a move that amplifies America’s losing position.   In addition, sending weapons to Ukraine is depleting our inventory.   All while a cock fight over Taiwan would be a disastrous loss should the US attempt to invoke a war.

Depleted weapons, depleted uranium supplies, depleted gas reserves, do NOT bode well for any defense conflict.   Add to the fray a depleted number of active service personnel and the US has set itself up for easy target practice.   It is concerning to realize that our DoD is compromised and militias will be our survival.

While billions have been allocated to the Pentagon, defense contractors have not been tapped for a contract.   Until there is a contract, a sum, and a date of completion, no weapons are being manufactured to replenish a waning inventory.   All of which is well known amongst allies and enemies.

Today, the Senate announced an additional $45 billion would be allocated to the Pentagon from the trillion dollar package – pushing even higher levels of inflationary spending.   A dervish circle of waste-spend-waste.

The Economist continues to discredit Janet Yellen – she would appear to be the next scapegoat that will collapse her legacy.  Raising the federal reserve interest rates is a policy that has had no effect other than to create inflationary stagflation.   But then the Federal Reserve has only two functions – raise rates and lower them.   A fairly idiotic means of attempting to appear relevant.

The New World may not be what was envisioned by the globalists, but much like the routine of George Carlin – cats never admit mistakes… “I meant to run into that wall”!   Taking credit for the Pandemic and now the Ukraine War, The Economist has declared a victory, albeit different, a success amidst a failure, and a relentless agenda to collapse America.

Most conservatives are sucking in their breath waiting for a midterm victory lap.   But an unprecedented Twitter feed by the MSM has stated that the Democrats will not only retain the House but ADD four seats…   Leaving the field open to election fraud – once again!

IT AIN’T OVER UNTIL THE FAT LADY SINGS!

Russia’s Female Macron! Sobchak.

Posted on by Helena

A new candidate for the presidency of Russia just announced ‘her’ candidacy, and it would appear she is the female Macron; young, beautiful, empty, and devoid of any political background or education. An actress, a socialite, Ashkenasi Jew, jaunting about on private jets to the EU, US and back, she has an interesting link. Rothschild/Soros.

Running on the fumes of her notoriety, Ksenia Sobchak has been described as the Russian version of Paris Hilton. Groomed? It would appear so.

Up until 2012, she was the ‘partner’ of Ilya Yashin, a renowned political activist and leader of the Peoples Freedom Party, or PARNAS. PARNAS was created by the merger of four organizations:   Russian People’s Democratic Union, Republican Party of Russia, Democratic Choice; and certain members of the Solidarity movement.   They are considered a liberal democrat party with ties to Alexei Navalny, and a collective organization termed, The Other Russia, which supports liberalism, socialism and communism. Dissolved into PARNAS in 2010, The Other Russia was the brain child of chessman, Garry Kasparov.

Sobchak was an active anti-Putin protestor alongside Ilya Yashin. Her mother, Lyudmila     Narusova, is an active politician and member of the ‘A Just Russia’ party which advocates for a welfare state and New Socialism. This party is also an amalgamation of a number of other parties, merged into one in 2006.

For decades Soros and the Rothschilds have been attempting to gain control of the Russian government. Having established numerous offshoots of The Open Society and Rothschild banking institutions, in 2015 Russia obliterated them all and expelled both Soros and Rothschild from Russia and issued an international arrest warrant.

That didn’t go over well.

In 2012, Sobchak quite suddenly switched gears and married Maxim Vitorgan, also an actor, had a child, and remained rather low key until she suddenly emerged as a candidate for presidency.

One of Ms. Sobchak’s most vocal stances regards Ukraine, stating that “from the point of view of International Law, Crimea is Ukrainian”, despite the fact that 96% of Crimeans voted in the referendum to reunite with The Russian Federation.   Despite the people’s choice, Ms. Sobchak believes that Law not People takes precedent citing a violation of the 1994 Budapest Memorandum.

The Memorandum protects the sovereign rights of Ukraine against US, Irish, UK and/or Russian threat or use of force. Russia claims that the US and UK instigated a coup which constituted ‘force’. The US and UK claim Crimea was annexed.

Partnering with Navalny, who is disqualified from running for presidency of Russia, Sobchak has declared that she is his ‘stand-in’, calling herself a ‘mouthpiece for all those who cannot become candidates’. This leads to the inference that she is simply a pawn with a well known name running on behalf of – Navalny.

According to Khodorkovsky’s blog, in an interview in 2015 he endorsed his support for his ally, Navalny, against Putin.   Khodorkovsky is also a political activist and former billionaire in exile in Switzerland. Khodorkovsky headed the Open Russia Foundation on behalf of George Soros.   And so, the pieces of the puzzle would seem to lead to the quite plausible conclusion that Sobchak is in fact an appealing face with two parents whose names are familiar in the political sphere of Russia, working in conjunction with the Soros/Rothschild cabal to trounce Putin and replace him with their marionette whose strings will then be manipulated by Navalny from within Russia, and Khodorkovsky from afar. Like Hillary, we can assume that all decisions will ultimately come from the ‘true mouthpiece’, George Soros.

One of the more common forms of dissent coordinated and praised by Navalny, Khodorkovsky and Yashin has been violent protests… another earmark of the Soros rule of law – Divide and Conquer! It is also worth noting that support for Navalny and Khodorkovsky is repeatedly declared by; The New York Times, Washington Post and The Economist.

While MSM would have us believe that Sobchak is affiliated with Putin via her late father who mentored Putin, given her radicalization with Navalny, and Yashin, it is much more likely she has been chained to the Soros factory.