Forced by respective governments to vacate Mali and Niger, France has used Ukraine and US aid money to fund terrorism across the Sahel Region.
Between 1884 and 1885, The Berlin Conference, organized by Otto von Bismarck, established rules for claiming and dividing African territories among European countries. The boundaries that represent African countries today were established by their European colonialists. Enslaving the people under their rule. The conference included 14 European countries including Russia, the Ottoman Empire, and the US.
No African leader was present at this Conference. France and Britain were given the bulk of land:
As African countries looked for independence, in the 1990’s, the terrorists arrived including al Qaeda, Boko Haram, and ISIS were the frontrunners with various affiliates to obscure funding. The purpose of the terrorism was to regain control by respective European countries as their hold was disintegrating. Therefore, they created the ‘common enemy’ syndrome with the propaganda they would be the saviors… Necessitating their military deployments in the African nations.
It has been stated that the Mossad, MI6 and America created and continues to fund these terrorist organizations. Initiating the thematic ‘destroy Islam’ on behalf of Israel. While the terrorists operate throughout Africa in order to cleanse the continent of ‘undesirables’.
In 2022, France’s colonies; Burkina Faso, Mali, Niger and Chad kicked out French troops, terminating what were labeled ‘Defense Agreements’ against terrorism. Despite those ‘agreements’, terrorism was never eradicated. Military juntas took control and began reorganizing their country’s
Before HAMAS became the terrorist enemy in Palestine, the Mo9ssad accused al Qaeda of operating inside Gaza. The purpose? Justification. For appearances, France would insert affiliated Prime Ministers and Presidents whose loyalty was to French rule. The current rulers come from the military junta having declared a coup in 2021. In alliance with the Socialist International, these African leaders were chosen under the guise of Democracy. The same Democracy propaganda used to infiltrate the US government and conduct widespread riots across America. Actionable this coming June 14th in 1500 cities.
The First Socialist International was formed in 1864 by socialist, communist, anarchist political groups and trade unions. It was followed by the Communist International formed by the Bolsheviks in the newly minted Soviet Union. The Second Socialist International was created post WWII in 1951, London. In the US it is the Progressive Alliance.
Pedro Sanchez is president of the organization while simultaneously serving as Prime Minister of Spain. The appointment of PM in Spain is not an elected office but an insertion made by King Felipe VI. After attending college in Brussels and a Harvard affiliate in Barcelona, Sanchez was sent to NYC. He held a cabinet office at the UN, and was an advisor for the European Parliament completing his grooming.
Various presidents of SI have included Jewish Willy Brandt who changed his name to avoid persecution by the Nazi’s during WWII. Brandt worked for and was on the black book payroll for the CIA beginning in 1948 funding his election into the German Parliament. He ran SI from 1964 thru 1987.
The implication is that the CIA is running the German Parliament and has since the end of WWII.
“As African countries looked for independence, in the 1990’s”
As for as I recollect, Britain allowed most of its ex-colonies Independence by the end of the 1970’s. Indeed it is interesting a] how quickly they got Independence and b] the difference Southeast Asian Countries developed in comparison to African states. I shouldn’t mention how many people from these states sought leave to enter the UK after Independence and the British were kicked out.
They were still militarized by the Euriopean countries – hence the Sahel regions only recently told France to pull out its military. The military could choose the PM and/or President. All Rigged so that France, et al, could continue to rape the countries of their valuable resources. Without which they have NOTHING!!!
There is no credible evidence to support the claim that France has used Ukraine and U.S. aid money to fund terrorism across the Sahel region. This statement appears to be a conspiracy theory and lacks any substantial backing from reliable sources or factual reports.
The Berlin Conference was convened to establish rules for the partitioning of Africa among European powers. The major European imperial powers—such as Britain, France, Germany, Belgium, Portugal, and Spain—were already actively involved in colonization efforts in Africa. The conference was largely driven by European competition for dominance over African resources, strategic territories, and trade routes. The U.S. at the time was not an active player in the European scramble for Africa, focusing more on domestic affairs and the Americas through doctrines like the Monroe Doctrine (1823), which emphasized the U.S. sphere of influence in the Western Hemisphere, rather than in Africa.
The Monroe Doctrine (1823), a cornerstone of U.S. foreign policy, proclaimed that any European intervention or colonization in the Americas would be considered a hostile act against the United States. This policy signified the U.S. was primarily concerned with maintaining control and influence in the Western Hemisphere, rather than engaging in the European-dominated Scramble for Africa. The U.S. had a history of opposing colonialism, as seen in its support for anti-colonial movements in Latin America and elsewhere.
By the 1880s, the U.S. had significant racial divisions and ideologies that influenced its international outlook. While Europeans believed in their civilizing mission in Africa (often called the “White Man’s Burden”), many in the U.S. were deeply segregated in their views on race. As a result, African colonization was not seen as part of the U.S. national identity in the same way it was for European countries like Britain or France.
It wasn’t until after the Spanish-American War (1898), in which the U.S. acquired territories like Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Philippines, that the U.S. began to embrace a more active role in global imperialism. However, by then, most of Africa had already been claimed by European powers, and the U.S. would not have been able to participate in the Berlin Conference in the same way as the European powers.
[[ It has been stated that the Mossad, MI6 and America created and continues to fund these terrorist organizations Initiating the thematic ‘destroy Islam’ on behalf of Israel. While the terrorist operate throughout Africa in order to cleanse the continent of ‘undersirables’. ]] … introduces a completely different theme from the previous discussion on the Berlin Conference, colonialism, and U.S. involvement in Africa.
During the Cold War, both the CIA (U.S.) and MI6 (UK) were involved in a variety of operations to counter Soviet influence, which included supporting rebel groups or militant organizations in Africa, Asia, and the Middle East. Israel was involved in certain proxy conflicts, particularly in Africa and the Middle East, but these operations often served Israel’s own national security interests, rather than simply being part of a Western-led conspiracy.
Mossad, Israel’s intelligence agency, has had a long history of engaging in covert operations to protect Israel’s security—including assassinations, sabotage, and intelligence gathering. However, the specific claim that Mossad has funded terrorist groups for geopolitical purposes is highly contentious and lacks clear, verified evidence.
In some conspiracy circles, Israel’s involvement in Middle Eastern conflicts—like its support for certain factions during the Iran-Iraq War or its role in the Lebanese Civil War—has led to misunderstandings or deliberate mischaracterizations of Mossad’s role. This can sometimes be linked to the blood libel accusations, in which Israel or Jews are blamed for orchestrating violence for nefarious purposes.
The 1980s and Iran-Contra Affair, while Israel was involved, the role Mossad played was primarily in brokering arms deals rather than funding terrorist organizations per se. However, some critics have argued that Israel’s role in supplying weapons and intelligence to Iran indirectly contributed to fostering instability in the region, but not directly to funding terrorism.
Some claims have surfaced that Israel has used terrorism as a tool of statecraft, especially through its historical dealings with Palestinian militant groups. For instance, some conspiracy theorists suggest that Israel has facilitated the rise of certain extremist factions in order to justify military actions or gain global sympathy. However, these claims are often not substantiated with direct evidence and should be approached with caution. The Israeli government’s official stance has always been that it opposes terrorism, but there are instances of covert dealings or backchannel diplomacy with certain factions that could be seen as strategic rather than ideological.
The blood libel you mentioned—particularly in relation to Mossad—refers to false allegations that Israel, through its intelligence services, is somehow directly behind or funding Islamist extremist groups such as Al-Qaeda or ISIS. These claims have been circulated in some propaganda or conspiracy circles, especially in the Middle East.
Mossad’s role in funding terrorism as described in some versions of this narrative is not substantiated by credible evidence. Claims such as these are often rooted in anti-Semitic tropes, as “Israel orchestrating terrorism” feeds into broader conspiracy theories involving Jewish global control or the destabilization of Islam. Many of these theories are debunked by experts, including intelligence officers, academics, and historians, who note that terrorist organizations like Al-Qaeda and ISIS have their own ideological motives that do not align with Israel’s objectives.
The claim that Mossad engages in creating or funding terrorist organizations for geopolitical gain (or as part of a broader “destroy Islam” agenda) is often based on conspiracy theories and anti-Semitic rhetoric that dates back to the early 20th century (e.g., the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, which falsely accused Jews of world domination). This kind of rhetoric has been debunked repeatedly by credible sources, and the evidence that supports it is almost non-existent outside of unverified claims or propaganda from groups with a vested interest in creating anti-Israel narratives.
The blood libel claim, specifically, often ties back to false accusations that Israel deliberately creates extremist groups to destabilize the region. This narrative is counterproductive to understanding the complex realities of terrorism in the Middle East. Terrorist groups like ISIS, Al-Qaeda, and Hezbollah have their own goals and ideologies that are not dependent on Israel’s actions, and many are directly opposed to Israel or Western interests.
The assertion that Mossad accused al-Qaeda of operating in Gaza before Hamas became the primary “terrorist enemy” in the region could be seen within the context of Israel’s broader geopolitical and security strategies. This claim ties into Israel’s need to justify its actions in the Gaza Strip and the broader Middle East, especially during times when international attention or diplomatic pressure wherein Arab and Western propaganda promoted and pushed the “Occupied Territories” lies.
Willy Brandt, born Herbert Ernst Carl Frahm in 1913, was indeed of German-Jewish descent. However, it’s crucial to note that Brandt changed his name during the rise of Nazism, not because of his Jewish heritage but to protect himself from persecution under the Nazi regime. Brandt was born to a Protestant family, and there is no strong evidence to suggest he himself was specifically raised as a practicing Jew. However, under Nazi racial laws, he was at risk due to his mother’s Jewish heritage.
Brandt, as a Socialist and a political dissenter, was also opposed to the Nazi regime, which likely motivated his decision to flee to Norway in 1933 as a refugee, where he continued to work in resistance to the Nazi regime. His name change was part of his efforts to evade Nazi persecution rather than to hide his Jewish roots, though it’s often used in narratives about his identity and political work.
The claim that Willy Brandt was on the CIA payroll starting in 1948 is an assertion that seems to stem from conspiracy theories or less verified sources. Willy Brandt became Mayor of West Berlin in 1957 and then the Chancellor of West Germany in 1969. His career was primarily defined by his social democratic policies and his efforts to improve relations with East Germany (leading to Ostpolitik). This period coincided with the Cold War and the deepening rivalry between the Soviet Union and the United States.
There’s no solid proof to suggest that Brandt was directly funded by the CIA in the way. Direct claims about Brandt’s connection to CIA funding for his election to the German Parliament are unsubstantiated or likely based on speculation.
From 1964 to 1987, Brandt served as the President of the Socialist International, which was a global organization of socialist parties and movements. The Socialist International had both social-democratic and leftist elements, and Brandt’s leadership of the SI was focused on fostering cooperation among socialist and social democratic parties worldwide, rather than direct covert involvement in intelligence operations. His legacy in the SI is mostly associated with efforts to modernize socialist principles and to deal with the divisions within the socialist world during the Cold War.
The “Black Book” (also known as the “Black Book of the CIA” or the “Black Book” of various intelligence agencies) generally refers to secretive lists of people, organizations, and operations, often involving covert agents or assets. In certain conspiracy theories or historical contexts, the term has been used to describe lists of individuals or groups that intelligence agencies, such as the CIA, MI6, or Mossad, allegedly keep track of for various political, diplomatic, or covert reasons.
Brandt was a key figure in the Socialist International, which had both socialist and social-democratic factions. This was a critical period in the East-West divide, as Brandt pushed for Ostpolitik and diplomatic dialogue with the Soviet Union and the Eastern Bloc. In the case of Willy Brandt, while there is no solid evidence that he was directly funded by the CIA, it is conceivable that during his rise in German politics and his tenure as Chancellor (1969-1974), the CIA (along with other Western intelligence agencies) could have seen his social-democratic policies as more palatable than the alternative of a communist-leaning or pro-Soviet government in West Germany.
In the case of Willy Brandt, his role in Ostpolitik (the policy aimed at normalizing relations with East Germany and the Soviet Union) was often controversial among both Western powers and Soviet-backed states. Some conspiracy theorists and critics have speculated that Brandt may have had indirect links to intelligence agencies, either because of his diplomatic role or due to his sensitive position within the Cold War framework. However, these claims remain speculative and lack concrete evidence. There’s no verified evidence to suggest that Willy Brandt was an active asset or was directly funded by Western intelligence agencies in a payroll capacity. Any speculation of Brandt’s relationship to intelligence agencies is largely theoretical or based on indirect Cold War logic rather than confirmed fact. Willy Brandt’s political platform, while left-leaning, was largely based on dialogue and diplomacy and not a revolutionary agenda that would be a threat to Western interests.
A note on Al-Qaida: Al Quida, The Base, was the computer list of the CIA operatives hired to disrupt and destroy the Taraki government of Afghanistan. There were never more than three hundred people on the list. Bin Laden was not a leader, he was a money man. The destruction of the Afghanistan government was a “black op” and one of the prime sources for funds was Saudi Arabia.
Al-Quida is always presented as a world-wide top-down terrorist organization. The world-wide top-down terrorist organization is the CIA.
The Al-Quida black op worked so well in Afghanistan that it pops up wherever the CIA has a dirty deal going.
France was in Vietnam to colonize that country but could not. Our military first went to Vietnam to advise France, and then they left, leaving us ‘holding the bag’.
The U.S. government helped to create that which later was termed the Viet Cong. They were in essence the fighters who challenged France. After the French defeat, the U.S. moved this population into the south to create more trouble. As usual, the U.S. behind the Communist guerillas.
Check out Fletcher Prouty on YouTube.