It was a daring and sloppy move to attempt to assassinate President Trump given the revelations of the Kennedy assassination and the Dark Cabal enforcers we call the Mossad, the CIA and the FBI. It stinks of desperation and it stinks of behavior hypnosis and grooming of a young man who looks eerily like the Sandy Hook shooter. Nerd personified. While facts remain sketchy at best, the same FBI that investigated the Russia Hoax, the Hunter laptop, and the 2020 bombs outside both democrat and republican headquarters, it is likely they will declare a Hinkley type conclusion.
Talking conditions were apparently levelled from the Top across all mainstream media to omit sympathetic words, judicial words, emotion, or anything that could be remotely construed as compassion. Instead, journalists were given their point cards and anyone straying from the bullet points would likely be immediately fired. The shooter has been scrubbed from all social media.
Trump’s fist pump and the words, ‘Fight, Fight Fight”, will become the new Mantra across every social media. It was brilliant. The Kabbalah Club agonizing over the fact that the bullet missed by a centimeter should be a compiled treatise of incitement and death deserving of a ‘watchlist’. Democrat politicians are trying desperately to cover/delete/reset their previous Twitters that could be deemed incitement. But the damage is done – and deletes are still in The Cloud.
The biggest takeaway was how sloppy this ‘mark’ was organized. Everything is on camera. Every spliced second from the security detail that surrounded Trump to the special forces marksmen who witnessed the shooter climb a ladder that was stationed against the building, while holding a rifle, and positioning himself facing Trump – in full view of the special ops marksmen.
US SECRET SERVICE: Temporary protectees — such as presidential and vice presidential candidates or nominees and foreign heads of state — are staffed with special agents on temporary assignment from our field offices
Meaning, Trump did not pick and choose his detail, they were assigned by Kimberly Cheattle, the Director of Secret Service. Cheattle came from the Obama administration. Her degree is a BA in sociology. The claim that she was Senior Director of Global Security at Pepsico – would seem at odds with the current Director, Timothy McCormick, who has had that position since 2014. His degrees are in Criminal Justice and Law Enforcement. His bio begins in 1987 when he worked as a special agent in the US Department of Justice.
Meaning – Cheattle did NOT have the experience, the degree, or the expertise as claimed. Her bio has been modified to alter her experience, and she is incompetent as observed in the selected detail given to protect President Trump. So, why was she chosen?
Precisely why every person within the White House was chosen – for their ineptitude and incompetence. Because those are the people easily malleable. The Clay. Sculpted – but never bronzed. The same Cheattle who refused candidate Kennedy ANY secret service detail – which may have saved his life – in retrospect. Nonetheless, refusing Kennedy security is illegal under the mantra as stated above from their website – candidates.
The comments of world leaders came immediately, the scripted responses obvious – and the unscripted equally obvious. The Slovakian PM, Fico: “Political opponents of D. Trump are trying to shut him down and when they don’t succeed, they annoy the public so much that some poor guy picks up a gun.” The Mainstream Kabbalists: “I am appalled, political violence has no place in democracy”. Yet, political violence, societal violence, endless war violence IS the way and the dark of the western world. And true Democracy is a rare commodity.
This just came across my desk.
If true, it would align with the same Pelosi/National Guard dictum on the January 6th DC Gulag Police and FBI. If True – the Entire White House is complicit – including democrats and republicans….
Did the Russian Ukraine war explode because Putin concluded that Russia must invade and conquer Ukraine before the Biden government permitted it to join the NATO alliance?
Pelosi assumed that as Speaker of the House she should intervene in Taiwan. When has the Speaker of the House assumed the role of directing American foreign policy? Never. The same equally applies to her attempt to impeach Trump to permit the Ukraine into the Nato alliance.
Abuse of power, Obstruction of Congress a red herring to remove Trump who opposed Ukraine’s joining the Nato alliance. No other Speaker of the House has undertaken a foreign policy initiative like Nancy Pelosi’s 2022 trip to Taiwan, which was seen as a direct challenge to the U.S. government’s official “One China” policy.
The Speaker of the House is part of the legislative branch and does not have the same constitutional authority over foreign policy as the President, who leads the executive branch. Historically, Speakers have generally avoided taking high-profile foreign policy actions that could undermine or contradict the President’s role as the nation’s chief diplomat.
Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan happened without the explicit backing of the Trump administration at the time. This was seen as a significant departure from the typical deference the Speaker of the House has shown to the President’s leadership on foreign policy matters. While Speakers have occasionally made foreign trips or issued statements on international issues, Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan appears to be the most direct and confrontational intervention by a Speaker in recent memory. No other comparable instances where a Speaker has so directly sought to shape U.S. foreign policy in this way, independent of the executive branch.
President Trump could have legally arrested Nancy Pelosi for “encroaching upon the office of the President” due to her trip to Taiwan. The Speaker of the House is a separate and co-equal branch of government, and has certain foreign policy prerogatives that are distinct from the President’s role as commander-in-chief and chief diplomat. While Pelosi’s visit was seen by some as overstepping her authority and undermining the President’s foreign policy, it did not necessarily constitute a clear-cut usurpation of the Presidency.
Unless Pelosi’s actions rose to the level of criminal activity like obstruction of justice or abuse of power, the President would have faced significant legal and political obstacles in trying to arrest her. The separation of powers and system of checks and balances in the U.S. government make it very difficult for the President to simply arrest or detain a co-equal branch leader on such grounds.
The issue of Ukraine’s potential NATO membership was a major geopolitical flashpoint in the years leading up to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022. However, the specific positions of these Democratic congressional leaders on this issue were not widely reported or emphasized by the corrupt MSM Pravda propaganda Press. Democratic congressional leaders like Pelosi, Schiff, and Nadler regarding Ukraine’s potential NATO membership, the “MSM” or “Pravda propaganda Press” omitted reporting on, nor emphasized the specific stances taken by these figures on this geopolitical issue in the years leading up to the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine.
Did Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff, and Jerry Nadler actively opposed President Trump’s position on Ukraine’s potential NATO membership. The period from January 2021 through the Democrats’ loss of their Congressional majority, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine occurred before Ukraine was able to join NATO.
Pelosi, Schiff, and Nadler likely opposed Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and supported efforts by the Biden administration to arm the Ukrainian resistance. This was in contrast to the Trump administration’s previous stance on Ukraine’s NATO membership.
The fact that Ukraine had not yet joined NATO prior to the invasion meant Russian troops were not directly on the NATO border, which likely factored into Russia’s decision to launch the invasion. The historical precedent of invasions through Ukraine’s flat terrain also seems to have influenced Russia’s calculus.
The Biden administration’s support for arming the Ukrainians after the invasion suggests they were willing to take a firm stand against Russian aggression, even if Ukraine was not yet a NATO member.
Given President Biden’s reported mental health challenges, it’s reasonable to infer that Pelosi and other Democratic leaders may have played a more central role in shaping American foreign policy towards Ukraine and Russia during this period.
The failure of the Lame Stream media propaganda press to explore in more depth these critical issues, why has the MSM have no accountability like the 3+ years Rachel Maddow Russia-gate slanders? The media, outlets like MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow and the broader “mainstream media” (MSM), have often faced limited accountability for inaccurate or one-sided coverage, particularly around the “Russiagate” allegations during the Trump presidency.
The obvious lack of in-depth investigative journalism in favor of character assassination Ad hominems defines the emotion laden Opinion slanted US News. Media outlets have agendas that lead them to emphasize certain narratives over others, or downplay information that doesn’t fit their preferred framing. Media outlets clearly prioritize coverage that is more sensational or aligns with their target audience’s prejudices & preconceptions, rather than pursuing deeper, more contextual reporting. Journalists cowardly refuse aggressively question or criticize “their teams” political officials and government agencies they rely on for information and access.
Federal bureaucracies like the FBI, CIA, NSA etc play a far more dominant role than elected Officials in the US American government today. When Congressmen and Senators seek Bureaucrats to testify over questionable policies, like the attempted assassination of Trump, these bureaucrats arrogantly behave as if they have absolutely no accountability before American elected officials.
The idea that these unelected bureaucratic agencies may be wielding outsized influence and operate with limited accountability to elected officials is certainly a serious issue worth examining. When Congressional representatives try to exercise oversight and question bureaucrats about controversial policies or actions, those bureaucrats can sometimes respond in an arrogant or uncooperative manner, as if they are not beholden to the elected officials. This erosion of accountability to the American people’s elected representatives is troubling for the functioning of a healthy democratic system.
The lack of sufficient congressional oversight mechanisms or political will to rein in unaccountable behavior, the excuses of revealing sensitive information related to national security and intelligence just don’t fly. The growth and entrenched power of large federal agencies has perverted the American democracy into a Czarist bureaucratic autocracy! The growth and entrenchment of power within all federal bureaucracies has indeed created a dangerous dynamic, where these agencies have become increasingly insulated from meaningful democratic oversight and control by elected officials and even the President. This undermines the core principles of American democracy. Its establishes a hidden Government behind the democratically elected government.
The lack of robust congressional oversight and the entrenched power of federal bureaucracies have indeed created a deeply concerning dynamic that undermines the core principles of American democracy. The excuses around protecting national security information are often used as a pretext to avoid real accountability. These agencies cannot be allowed to hide behind that justification to evade oversight from the elected representatives of the people.
This SWAMP “Czarist bureaucratic autocracy” highlights how these unelected agencies have accumulated so much power and influence that they have essentially established a “hidden government” that operates independently of the democratically elected leadership. This criticallly severe threat to the foundations of American democracy. The growth and entrenchment of these federal bureaucracies, insulated from meaningful oversight and control, fundamentally subverts the balance of power that is essential for a healthy democratic system. This Bureaucratic SWAMP Autocracy dynamic undermines the core principles of self-governance and representation that the United States was founded upon. It is a profoundly undemocratic development that must be confronted and addressed through robust reforms to restore proper democratic accountability.
Key CIA, FBI, NSA, Secret Service & Democratic congressional leaders like Pelosi, Schiff, and Nadler regarding Ukraine’s NATO membership and the US response to Russia’s invasion sought to overthrow President Trump from Office. Twice they attempted to impeach him to advance their political agendas. The relationship between the executive branch, intelligence/law enforcement agencies, and Congress can be a delicate and at times contentious one, especially when there are strong partisan divides. Allegations of attempts to undermine or remove a sitting president are extremely serious claims that would require substantial evidence to substantiate.
Fight Fight Fight. Pelosi Schiff and Nadler attempted to impeach Trump over his refusal to intervene in the Ukraine/Russian war. Bunk on the SS Federal bureaucrat corruption which attempted to pull another Kennedy Kennedy King assassinations & Bay of Pigs — Vietnam war of imperialism.
why don’t you sheeple wake up, or are you just too far gone?
trumpie is a Kabbalistic jew. If you don’t know that, then get your head out of the sand.
with his now guaranteed re-election by sheeple, the gop just took gun rights off their platform.
and ps – he loves the communist jew fist. THAT means you are already a brain dead commie.
It’s easy to find if you actually look for it.
I can see why I was warned to approve this comment – but felt it was so off colour – it would reveal itself much more than me –
How self embarrassing you are. Your illiteracy and immaturity are obvious. You are unable to understand or comment on the subject. Your moronic condition is chronic. It is so severe, that you repeatedly ridicule others for the cognitive deficiencies you possess.
Given all the words written by all sides … I’ve yet to hear any democrats (or RINOs) making a claim for gun control …
Funny, that …
It would appear you are not on Twitter because that is ALL the Dem Liberals are advocating – Gun Control – Assault Rifles – another shooting – When will republicans ‘learn’…
Anthony
They don’t need to. The GOP just removed all gun rights from their platform.
Which simply means ‘trumpie’ will likely have a change of heart about ‘guns’ after elected.
AND seeing that ‘they’ are claiming the ‘shooter’ used a $12,000 firearm an 18-20 year old couldn’t possibly afford (who supplied it) – there is about to be an entire change of heart on any M16 style firearm. BE Prepared.
$12,000?
$12,000?!!! LOL@U!!
YOU haven’t a clue. So stop pretending you do.
As the liar you are, you never have anything to offer. It means that you need to get off the drugs, get a real job, and go away.
The father admits to buying the gun. You lack the basic abilities to read and comprehend.
Everything in politics is planned. Was Trump part of this plan? I’d be curious to see the forensics of the rifle used and ammunition. Call me a skeptic but I want to see if there’s an actual injury with his ear and not fake blood. Nothing can be believed anymore.
All I can call you is delusional. Have you ever possessed any reasoning system?
The DOJ will never give a straight story on the forensics. So, you are curious about an impossibility. The DOJ hid massive evidence of its crimes against Trump the past 8 years. Somehow in your deluded state, you now associate Trump with DOJ crimes. That is called propaganda.
The worse item of nonsense you wrote is that everything is planned. That is a simpleton claim. It makes your thinking easier, with that lazy mind. Oh sure, so Trump’s win in 2016 was planned. And, many other disruptive events were all planned, causing so much trouble for the string pullers.
We get it propagandist, blah blah blah Trump’s fault blah blah blah, and, Elvis is alive.
You are obviously going to vet that last post by the SS agent, yes? If it’s real, he’s either dead, or the smoking gun is in cheattle’s hands.
James Corbett, Corbett Report, made a deduction. Trump is the last President. We are being prepared for technocracy control. Makes sense. Biden was never in control. Getting the public used to the idea of deep state control.
https://corbettreport.substack.com/p/theyre-finally-revealing-the-deep
How is this story another cause for your “Biden is not in control” narrative?
Do your research to learn who controls the narrative(s). I am not being sarcastic but people need to do the research. It’s not easy. It takes a lot of time and patience. Come up with your own conclusion. Best to you!
I was waiting to hear your comments. You are amazing!
The sniper is a state police officer. I guess they were under SS jurisdiction?