The Australian government has passed a Referendum to alter the Constitution. The Amendment is set to be put to the peoples vote sometime between September and December. The Voice, as the referendum is called is billed as a means of alleviating discrimination against the aboriginal community of the country comprising roughly 880,000 persons. Note: A census does not exist and this number is an ‘estimate’. The total population of Australia is 25.7 million meaning the aboriginals make up about 3%. The Voice would give them power to make representations to The Parliament and Government.
- As a separate entity of the government, the members of The Voice would be determined after the Referendum passes. Obscurity.
- The referendum states that currently there would be a minimum of 24 members designated within the body – however, once the referendum passes, that number could arbitrarily be changed according to the document. Obscurity.
- The Voice would have specific remote representatives as well as representation for the mainland Torres Strait Islander population.
- The Voice will work alongside existing organizations and traditional structures…
- The Voice will be made up of those with “Aboriginal “Descent”. There is no percentage requirement, just descent, self identification and acceptance as having Aboriginal heritage no matter how diluted.
- The wording is obfuscated as applying to the Aboriginals only – but anything their Group feels affects them in any way – would be instructed to Parliament.
While claiming complete transparency, ‘existing organizations’ could include the Open Society Institute. Remote Representatives – is a revolving door. Aboriginal Descent could be hundreds of years ago…
It wreaks of WEF Agenda.
Aboriginals were brutally massacred when the British began colonizing Australia with its prison population. Today 16% of Australia’s land has been returned to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders. In the federal government there are 8 Senators (out of 76 = 11%) and 3 House members who identify as Islanders. By strict percentages they have tripled their minority population in Australia’s government.
So where is the discrimination?
As of its present read, The Referendum states that there would be a minimum of 24 members designated within the body – however, once the referendum passes, that number could arbitrarily be changed ~ according to the document. In other words – what is written now is meaningless and will be rewritten to favor our Agenda…
In order to sway votes, the Alba government established a $10.5 million fund to aid the Islanders in ‘mental health’ in the lead up to the vote. Once voted ‘Yes’, funding for The Voice would include $75.2 million over 2 years in support of ‘delivering the referendum’, while pushing for additional registration of more indigenous voters, and establish their governance structure. Once finalized an additional $160 million would get the Voice off the ground.
So what is the REAL purpose of this Constitutional Amendment that can never be repealed?
The Referendum was put forth and supported by:
Julian Leeser, a liberal jewish solicitor, and, Ken Wyatt, a liberal Indigenous Minister whose roots are Irish, English and Indian with minor indigenous ancestry. Wyatt identifies as an Aboriginal.
Wyatt has proposed that the Referendum be backed by an Indigenous Treaty approved by BLM, Black Lives Matter.
TREATY. Will Guarantee self-determination and land rights for Aboriginal people. Acknowledges the harm and pain caused by colonialization. Offers reparations or redress for harm to Aboriginal people and Communities. More Specifically: Between 2016 and 2017, before the Referendum was passed, documents related to emails from the National Indigenous Australians Agency outlined what said Treaty might entail: 1. Changing the Australian flag, 2. Increasing reparations, via setting aside a ‘fixed percentage of GDP’, payable by ‘white Australians’ to The Voice, 3. The establishment of a “Truth Commission’, 4. The institution of paying tax royalties to The Voice by ALL Australians as punishment for living in Australia as a nonindigenous person.
These are the first referendums already proposed by the Voice Commission to the Parliament… IN other words, the PLAN is to confiscate land and money from the white population and give it to the Aboriginals.
Annastacia Palaszczuk, the 39th Premier of Queensland was appointed by the British Royals and member of the Labour Party. She is a party to The Treaty Group assigned to determine how best to strip Australians of their sovereign rights and indebt them to this Voice Referendum.
Annastacia was indoctrinated by the London School of Economics where she received an Arts degree. It is the same institution Soros attended decades earlier. It is the equivalent to Harvard and linked to communist/Marxist ideologies.
The Treaty portion of the Referendum is what has riled the Citizens of Australia.
The difference between Gavin Newsome’s reparation committee and The Voice is the making it a Constitutional Amendment that could never be repealed – and be in force for eternity. The exodus of white people from Australia would be massive!
Given Australia is under the auspices of The Crown, King Charles, one of the writers of The Great RESET, and close bud of Klaus Schwab, the Voice Group could recommend Australia become a full consort of The Crown under the British Government. Charles could be a remote representative. Stack The Court Voice. In Fact given the Desire For Ambiguity – this should be enough for Voters to RUN!
The ambiguity and lack of basic transparency is phenomenal! The Committee pushing this Referendum routinely states that the obscurity will be removed only once the People Vote Yes. Too Late.
At which point it will forever alter the Constitution in ways and means to obliterate – white Australians.
BUYER BEWARE!
The exodus of white people from Australia would be massive!
But were could they go? In South Africa and Rhodesia many farmers left as soon as possible, then were able to resettle elsewhere. But now the whites left are mainly poor whites are the white liberal elite who think they can maintain there position.
Whilst a BLM can leave a country and claim asylum in the west due to discrimination on the grounds, race, religion, ethnicity or even sexual orientation. But let the whitey try the same thing and he will be told no, not a chance, because your problems are all caused by your ancestors.
I think Ken as a point the world seems to be at war against us whiteys [mostly by the white liberal elite] but this will not stop the BLM jumping on the band wagon. But logically, the whites are a minority group as regards the world population. Plus they are the only group who are told that they alone are guilty for what their ancestors did 100 or even a 1000 years ago.
When the white populations around the world suddenly realise that it will be bred out by mixed marriages, or realise that the plan is to make them second class citizens within their own countries [so much for the UN charter on Human Rights that all people should be treated equally regardless of race]. Then again that only came about after the damage done during two WW’s on the world due to infighting by two white tribes with different ideologies.
I am nearing the end of my eighth decade and just hope that the doo, doo hits the fan after I am gone.
Russia
Great Piece that fill the gaps in my knowledge around the The Voice.
Points of note:
Marx was a elite “plant” sponsored by them and, if I recall correctly, a relative of Darwin. The central idea of Marx’s theory is the destruction of the bourgeois, middle class who, coincidentally, are the only group of people to successfully resist (partially) the ruling elites. Notice how he never mentions Bankers and/or old elites.
Annastacia Palaszczuk – I live in Queensland and this Premier is the one of the worst and that is saying something. She is a complete WEF puppet who could not hold a job in the private sector . LSE must be handing out Art degrees like confetti, “Just regurgitate the propaganda, Comrade”.
As a fourth generation Australian of Irish and Scottish ancestry, my family related to me, the early European history of the region where we live (Northern Queensland). There were massacres and violence on both sides, (European and Aboriginal) and this, unfortunately, is human nature, not specific to Europeans. The result was determined by superior weaponry and numbers, as has always been the case. As an example, the New Zealand Maoris managed long sea voyages across the Pacific ocean but, according to some, never made it to Australia (come on!!). They would have but were given a “welcome to country” that they did not survive – do the Maori want repatriations from the Australian Indigiuous ???
Thank you! I was specifically asked to write about this by a contact in Australia. Lots of research. I hope it helps!!
Seems to be a world war on whites mostly by whites. So once whitey is broke and on the run,,, what’s their plan then? Punt….
Well that’s the $5.98 question that if answered would fall on deaf ears 🥸
you gotta pass the bill to find out what’s in it!