An article posted by CSIS (Center For Strategic & International Studies) is quite damning – not just in the acknowledgement that ‘regime change’ is the US intelligence main focus, but on their incompetence. There are nine separate intelligence agencies that US Taxpayers openly pay for – yet their means for determining ‘an action’ is Laurel & Hardy reincarnated. Strategy is co-opted by propaganda…
Lose over and over but use the Media to call it a win so thousands of incompetent agencies can continue to thrive monetarily. In their board room self esteem is biopic narcissistic; the US won Afghanistan, Iraq, and – Ukraine.
“The Future of War – Rethinking Risk in Great Power Competition”.
- War is simply a boys game of ‘competition’.
- The ‘Future’ is War.
- Risk is the fallout of their aggressive tactics – as in pushing an incursion with Russia caused a global depression, starvation, inflation, and a loss of alliances to BRICS+.
Oops. What to do?
The authors at CSIS propose is to modernize the strategic planning within the DoD. Imagine this:
“National Military Strategy and National Defense Strategy, the Joint Staff prepares the Joint Strategic Campaign Plan, which outlines priorities for CCMD contingency plans, including what potential crises to focus on and how often to update plans. Since these plans are bets about hypothetical futures, they tend to be isolated, static, and deterministic “what if” propositions.”
After the DoD gets together with the relative agencies and they brutalize some plans of action at various locales across the globe, those plans remain in force for 2 years before another meeting is convened. Contingencies are addressed periodically from a ‘shelf’ of options.
“General! The Ruskies have taken over all our biolabs in Ukraine… what the Fuck are we supposed to do?”
General Phillips, “Send out an AP media blitz about Ruskie casualties!”
“But we don’t know what the numbers are – no one does! What should I say?”
General Phillips, “For Christ’s sake man, make it up! If no one knows, they can’t challenge it. Hell, tell them to claim it is 200,000 to 300,000. Tell them We won, no tell them Ukraine has won the war!”
That would be Contingency #436 on the shelf.
Our entire military is essentially a ‘Green-Screen’.
The authors recommendation: “…active campaigning requires a constant reframing of key assumptions that captures the temporal component of risks identified during planning as they compound, wane, or accrue to new stakeholders over time.”
Gosh darn, in other words, the authors have used all their expertise to identify that ‘circumstances change more than every 2 years’ – and a more dynamic approach is needed to be addressed… In addition, it is noteworthy that risks associated with ‘CITIZENS’ being killed and maimed is replaced with the ‘Stakeholder’. There was NO mention of civilian fallout, death, dismemberment.
Nowhere in the paper is death mentioned as a cause for concern to adjust risk criteria, instead it is simply the associated Stakeholders. Those stakeholders would be the Defense Industrial Complex and Banking. Upholding stakeholder interests is the entire point of War. Rogue Whistleblowers and adverse media need to be quashed.
Lamenting the fact that Ukraine absorbed our weapon stockpiles and our ‘personnel deployments’ – the authors point to the failure that Iran was left out of the equation and now they haven’t the resources to destroy Iran. Apparently, these NINE agencies and NGO’s used their ‘instincts’ instead of actual strategic and intelligentsia ‘thinking’. Because strategies are only updated every 2 years, there is no formal process to alter, update or rethink plans of action on a day-to-day basis! Intelligence is thus processed on a ‘single dimension of risk’.
This would explain why the hype of propaganda is used instead to provide a ‘green-screen’ of the war as an allusion. It explains the common rhetoric of ‘fighting Ukraine until every Ukrainian is dead’ promoted by western governments. They don’t have a PLAN B!
The absence of risk assessment was obvious in the absurd US decision to blow up the Nord Stream without a proper EU resolution or legal precedent The entire purpose was supposedly to destroy Russia’s economy – without any intelligentsia considering the consequences to food, power, and recession risks to the entire EU. The secondary purpose was to set oil and gas prices for Big Oil. Achieved.
Cleanup. Cleanup means pretending it never happened? Like a five year old playground bully? How is it possible that Western military commanders are so ridiculously incompetent? Could it be that the ones making these decisions have ZERO training in military warfare or “Peace” – and instead are winging it while the props have been drugged?
Incompetency explains the ‘passive-aggressive’ stance taken against China. Create a boogey-man, incite rage, and when the economic reality is actually discussed as a ‘risk’ – the military complex backtracks. “Pretending’ everything is fine.
WHY hundreds of Generals are unable to commit to peace is because they are under orders to create $500billion+ for the Stakeholder benefactors, annually. The military thus focuses on the means to create the most money under orders of – nothing else matters. When an operation is botched, the Media launches into cataclysmic mode:
- Moscow’s Military Capabilities in Question After Massive LOSS
- What Ukraine Means For The World
- War Has TurboCharged the Green Transition
- Putin Must Turn 360’
- US Warns China About Providing ‘lethal aide’ To Russia
Daily hype. It used to work. When western citizens buried their heads in the sand. But with more extensive social media – even censorship couldn’t bring down the TRUTH. And Our Entire Military Complex Has NO Plan B.
TODAY, the CIA Tzars are in HYPER MODUS setting up a mass campaign to deluge Twitter with Fake News, Disinformation and Propaganda. There are multiple potential reasons: 1. To move the REAL topics into a different stratosphere, 2. To sway opinion. 3. To set up Twitter by later suing for not properly filtering dangerous propaganda.
Propaganda That is GEARED to distract from the news…
Daily hype. It used to work. When western citizens buried their heads in the sand. – Helena
I’m not so sure,,, From my view,,,Their heads are not buried in sand but rather in sheep dung,,, all the way to their toes.
“Any Action by China to provide lethal support to Russia would only reward aggression, continue the carnage and further undermine the rules based order” the US (Vice) President said.
Can you believe this bs! The US has provided their entire inventory of lethal weapons to Ukraine to kill Russians, and when in the last 100 years did the US ever abide by any rules based order including its own rules!
Worse…. most americons believe bs like this.
it is so odd that they use the exact same means as always… I would suggest well before Fall of Rome and Nero – meaning… I dare not say…