I am reading A Gentleman In Moscow which is about a Count forced into exile at Hotel Metropol located across from the Bolshoi on Red Square. The Bolsheviks have taken over Russia, executed the ruling Tsar and family, slaughtered millions, and a paragraph ensues as follows: “As best as the Count could determine, the Bolsheviks assembled whenever possible in whichever form for whatever reason. In a single week, there might be committees, caucuses, colloquiums, congresses, and conventions variously coming together to establish codes, set courses of action, levy complaints, and generally clamor about the world’s oldest problems in its newest nomenclature.”
Which of course would define America’s Congress. Committees to use up more taxpayer money convening new employees, self-styled experts, and a fair amount of toasting and banquet ibon-bons to fill the vacant portions of the day. Not Bolsheviks – Congress. A Congress that is in its entirety Bolshevik in its Communist ideology. It was on my mind as I saw a post about Jim Jordan, a man who has been excellent in proposing committees which never came to any conclusion or consequence…
“Jim Jordan is leading the fight to hold Washington accountable”. His own tag line.
Thus, it can be said that even though we are not a country of majority Bolsheviks, we are a country of Bolshevism, in part because; 1. The top ten wealthiest Americans are Jewish Khazars, and 2. The number of Jews masquerading as atheists, Christians, Catholics and Hindi would rearrange numbers existentially. – exponentially.
Behind every Bolshevik Zionist is a stolen name/identity. Stalin was actually, Ioseb Besarionis dze Jughashvili. Trotsky was actually Lev Davidovich Bronstein. Lenin was actually Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov. The Bolshevik Party was actually called, The All Union Communist Party. The purpose? Deception.
Whether capitalism, socialism, or communism, they are all failed ideologies that often culminate and converge into everything they claimed to abhor – as the power of money and class is ultimately revered. Xi Jinping’s wealth is an unknown, but according to nominal US Intel it is believed to be $1 billion. Bernie Sanders pocketed $30+ million in PAC donations. Lizzie Bordan Warren lied her way through roughly $350,000 in free education on the backs of American Indian funds and is now worth $12 to $60 million – so much for transparency.
The almighty dollar is always the quest no matter the political ideology. Differentiating them is a sad foray into the abyss – although the outcome on the peasant proletariat is always death, starvation, and degradation no matter the political affiliation. The common theme among all these ideologies is to Lie. It is the foremost tenet of the Zionist Books. To which The Protocols adhere.
The number of authors dating from the time of Marx to our present time who embraced Marxist ideology fantasy is testament: Sartre, Brecht, Beauvoir, HG Wells, Upton, Dickens, Sinclair, Steinbeck, Agee, Orwell, Pinter, etc… It was conceived as a utopian vision that became a dystopian nightmare. Because it does not envision or embrace the reality of man – the desire for money, fame, and power. Sometimes, that power is contrived within Christian dogma of subservience. But it IS The Snake in the Room. No matter how the ideology is reclothed.
The concept of a ‘classless’ society is one of the two main constructs of Marx.
AI: “Early societies had different forms of hierarchy based on leadership ability, age, or gender roles. These are different from the economically-driven concept of social class that emerged with complex societies and capitalism.” Wrong.
Hierarchy and class are interchangeable given they denote abilities and abilities denote intellect and ‘gifts’. If a child prodigy at the age of three can play Beethoven, should that child be encumbered with a classless label of ability and become a chimney sweeper? The concept was doomed from its inception. But Capitalism was also. “It takes money to make money”. “The Chosen People”? Really? The most egregious denotation of class available – using God as the harbinger of Class.
What would work?
Libertarian anarchism is posited by the Lew Rockwell clan. Akin to Mad Max. It too is a ridiculous concept that would result in unaccounted murders, rape, and theft under the guise of ‘to each his own’. It assumes that all peoples across the globe are equal in their mental, emotional, philosophical, ideological realm. An impossibility. Certainly, the concept of integration is one of the more perverse concepts that was NOT implemented in ancient times when peace did exist albeit in sporadic conclaves – such as the Minoans.
Yet, they were annihilated by the Macedonians who were jealous of their ‘class’. It is infinitely more possible to determine what doesn’t work than what does. As long as we have an historical reference that is based on truth. Unfortunately, that Truth was usurped by Khazarian Hebrew Jews who created themselves from the Turkic in order to create a fake peoples that for all intents don’t really exist. Who created a language that doesn’t exist – Hebrew. And a history that was fabricated over centuries of propaganda.
It is an amazing military strategy, however, it has never been upgraded, they continue to lose, because they are still in 1850. Robotic. The opportunity has been quashed. Too much internet. Global Leaders are digesting this putrid realization. Trump is ramping up his BRICS rhetoric and threatening tariffs on any who are aligned – with absolutely zero justification. And the unhinging mentality is becoming a bit off. Too little – Too Late. Realistically, THIS control has been put in place over a century plus – and Trump thinks he can outsmart them in days? Or – is this the distraction?
I don’t have a happy feeling.
The one aspect that I don’t think the Khazars considered – was the revelation of internet TRUTH. An invention, they themselves funded. The Irony is obvious. That which they created – destroyed them. SO. We Know. What Happens Next? How does Good Prevail?
Hello Helena. Your comment about stolen identity made me remember that pertaining to the Khazars. One thousand years ago the Khazars were known as highway men. Anyone who traveled into Khazaria was fair game. They were known for extreme cruelty and feared. After robbing and killing their victims they stripped them and put on their clothes. Identity theft to conceal who they really were. Deception same as today.
Oh, this article was on the money. Jim Jordan!
What you said about internet Truth! There are millions of researchers
On the web which includes the Everyday man and woman finding the evil in the shadows of the web – exposing pieces of information. Each nugget of info we find we share with those we meet. Wake up darlings. Here is the truth. You have little time left to wake up. Great,article! As for the Khazars, they shot their load. They best be hiding out. When the train hits the wall…
“The number of Jews masquerading as atheists, Christians, Catholics and Hindi would rearrange numbers existentially. – exponentially.”
Then they’re not Jews, who were chosen to be the first to shed God’s light onto the world, but Marxists posing as others, because real Jews are either persecuted or murdered, per Karl Marx’s 1843 directive to implement the “abolition of religion”, and the destruction of those civilizations “whose spiritual aroma is religion”*…
“The Jewish section of the Communist Party, known as the Yevesektsia,* was ruthless and fanatical in its treatment of Jewish society and Judaism. The Jewish Bolsheviks persecuted observant Jews, closed the religious schools and synagogues, exiled and executed leading rabbinic and lay persons, confiscated religious artifacts, and made it almost impossible to adhere to a halachically acceptable lifestyle. By 1919 all local religious kehillos, which were the agencies for Jewish sefl-government for centuries, were abolished, and their assets and functions taken over by the Yevesektsia. Religion was characterized as “superstition and cant.”‘ — “Triumph of Survival: The Story of the Jews in the Modern Era 1650-1995”, 1995, By Berel Wein.
https://books.google.com/books?id=11f9xBbOBBEC&pg=PA284&lpg=PA284&dq=bolsheviks+closed+Jewish+synagogues&source=bl&ots=wUDBlDBLAM&sig=s1DeWUaftZrO9lRqPPF_8E7PA6Q&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiGjp6z-rLLAhUMFT4KHUKUAJAQ6AEIUzAJ#v=onepage&q=bolsheviks%20closed%20Jewish%20synagogues&f=false
…and…
“Our suspicions were largely confirmed when, independently of one another, we found out that Bormann and his group were operating an unsupervised radio transmitter network and using it to send coded messages to Moscow. When OKW monitors reported this, Canaris demanded an investigation; but word came back that Hitler himself had emphatically forbidden any intervention: he had been informed in advance by Bormann of these Funkspiele, or fake radio messages, he said, and he had approved them.” — Reinhard Gehlen, The Service: The Memoires of General Reinhard Gehlen
Then after the war…
“It was not until after 1946, when I headed my own intelligence organization, that I had an opportunity to look into Bormann’s mysterious escape form Hitler’s Berlin bunker and his subsequent disappearance. Some time later I received conclusive proof of Bormann’s postwar movements. During the 1950s I was passed two separate reports from behind the Iron Curtain to the effect that Bormann had been a Soviet agent and had lived after the war in the Soviet Union under the cover as an advisor to the Moscow government, and has died in the meantime.” — General Reinhard Gehlen, “The Service: The Memoirs of General Reinhard Gehlen”, p. 71 (1972).
Hitler & leadership were Marxists, their assignment being European Jewry in order to speed up the State of Israel coming into fruition that would concentrate Jewry.
Now, for an extra bonus…
Marx’s Foundational Tautology
Marx writes (Chapter 24, first paragraph, Capital, 1867), “Hitherto we have investigated how surplus-value emanates from capital; we have now to see how capital arises from surplus-value.” See the tautology? Surplus value and capital are the same thing! How did this tautology get past the initial reviews? How did this tautology survive the intervening 158 years without being discovered, except for this political scientist? This again illustrates the magnitude of the Marxist co-option of our institutions.
Marx recognizes the tautology (using diversion to hide the tautology by calling it a “vicious circle”), and, as usual with other self-imploding observations, erects a non-defense defense:
“Chapter Twenty-Six: The Secret of Primitive Accumulation We have seen how money is changed into capital; how through capital surplus-value is made, and from surplus-value more capital. But the accumulation of capital presupposes surplus-value; surplus-value presupposes capitalistic production; capitalistic production presupposes the pre-existence of considerable masses of capital and of labour power in the hands of producers of commodities. The whole movement, therefore, seems to turn in a vicious circle, out of which we can only get by supposing a primitive accumulation (previous accumulation of Adam Smith) preceding capitalistic accumulation; an accumulation not the result of the capitalistic mode of production, but its starting point.”
Marx’s solution to his tautology is to tell us that the Capitalist mode of production commenced by “supposing”! Marx magically creates a primitive accumulation of capital base upon which the capitalist mode of production flowered from, but this “supposing” primitive accumulation of capital doesn’t solve the tautology, it merely pushes the tautology further back in time. According to Marx, In order to have capital one needs surplus value (“capital arises from surplus value”), but surplus value can’t exist without first capital existing (“surplus value emanates from capital”)! Pushing back a tautology to an earlier time period doesn’t solve the tautology. Nothing can.
In Capital, Marx begins his analysis with an already existing capitalist economy. Marx can’t explain how the capitalist economy came into existence because such an economy couldn’t come into existence according to Marx’s peculiar analysis of the capitalist economy where surplus-value created capital must first exist, but since surplus-value doesn’t exist yet, there can be no capital to begin the capitalist economy. To overcome this inherent contradiction in Marx’s “investigation”, he begins Capital where we find an already existing capitalist economy:
“The wealth of those societies in which the capitalist mode of production prevails, presents itself as “an immense accumulation of commodities,” its unit being a single commodity. Our investigation must therefore begin with the analysis of a commodity.”
====================
*Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right, Karl Marx (1843)
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/Marx_Critique_of_Hegels_Philosophy_of_Right.pdf
“The struggle against religion is, therefore, indirectly the struggle against that world whose spiritual aroma is religion.”
…and…
“The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is required for their real happiness. The demand to give up the illusion about its condition is the demand to give up a condition which needs illusions.”
…and…
“It is, therefore, the task of history, once the other-world of truth has vanished, to establish the truth of this world.”
Now you know what Marxists are referring to when they utter the phrase, “The Struggle”…
“The struggle against religion is, therefore, indirectly the struggle against that world whose spiritual aroma is religion.”
“We Know. What Happens Next? How does Good Prevail?”– Let’s form a committee–just kidding.
A free press where truth can be told, would be a good start. Presently the press is not free, the MSN is owned by the Khazars who do not want truth to be told. Even publicly owned radio and tv are stifled, the khazars control them. The BBC is unashamedly pro-genocide of the Palestinians. The CBC in Canada will not speak of the genocide in Palestine but if a jew is killed its death is reported as if it was the death of a royal or admired statesman.
I would suggest the MSN be required to allow the news to be told by separating the news from the upper management free from pressure and the threat of dismissal.