Blinken is on a whirlwind tour to save the world, bring peace to Israel, cement a New Middle East with a Saudi Plan that has a strategic blackmail footnote attached, and up the death toll in Russia. One might think he was installed to run the White House while Rip Van Binkie Biden – naps. Problem. Blinken presents as a pathological liar.
The United Nations, without Palestine, is voting on a US created plan for an Israeli cease and desist and Palestine capitulation. But Israel has already denied the UN’s ICJ sanction of Netanyahu – delegitimizing the entire UN Council that is voting on an Israeli peace deal…. Given that Israel has violated every Plan to date, has ignored UN demands for cease fire, and the entire western denunciation of Treaty’s and Contracts, this New Plan will likely collapse in days if not hours. Because the underlying hatred can now never be dismissed.
Once a man’s ‘Word’ has been broken it cannot be reestablished with a pact written on a piece of paper. Ukraine has shown the value of Treaty’s and Pacts. Israel has similarly, throughout its history in Palestine, shown the value of Treaty’s. Treaty’s are made to be broken. At any given moment a country may simply deny its existence and start a war. Because war is built on ego and emotion – not paper.
Netanyahu has a vision. He has declared that no matter Pact or Treaty he might sign, his vision overrides. That vision is for no more Palestinians so he can control the entire territory and its resources. Blinken’s solution is for Egypt to allow Palestinians to cross the border and become refugees. He is there to grease the hand of el Sisi while fulfilling Netanyahu’s vision. The Catch: Netanyahu’s vision requires other Middle East countries to align with Israel.
Enter Blinken proposing the ‘deal of the century’ to Saudi Arabia – the carrot. Condition? Saudi Arabia must publicly support Israel:
“National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan indicated in May that the US and Saudi Arabia were inching towards a major deal that would “reshape the Middle East.”
Translation: Blinken is offering Saudi Arabia a stakeholder investment in the New Israel (all Palestinians expelled) that will become the source of mass wealth via the Ben Gurion Canal Project, a hyper-modern city rivaling Dubai or NEOM, confiscation of the oil and gas reserves off Gaza, and the replacement of the Suez Canal with direct access to NEOM.
Egypt will be left with an empty Suez Canal, and 2+ million angry refugees…
Worsening Blinken’s attempt to draw Saudi Arabia into his sphere is the fact that Blinken assisted Netanyahu in the latest ‘hostage rescue scheme’ that resulted in the deaths of 274 Palestinians – for 4 hostages. ‘Casualties of war’. But hardly the stance that Blinken portrays to the Saudi regime of ‘working for peace’. Further defining Blinken’s inability to speak Truth. his ‘Word’ is thus – worthless. A man whose ‘Word’ is worthless – is a worthless man.
Every Treaty is proven worthless. Ukraine most recently laughed at the absurdity of the Minsk Agreement claiming the West never intended to uphold it! Israel’s ‘word’ is worthless. The vision is to completely absorb Palestine into Israel. The Treaty is simply an illusion to accommodate global outcry.
To protect Netanyahu from the ICJ’s arrest warrant, Blinken is looking into utilizing the 2002 US Law, The American Service Members Protection Act (Hague Invasion Act). The Act gives the president power to use “all means necessary and appropriate to bring about the release of any U.S. or allied personnel being detained or imprisoned by, on behalf of, or at the request of the International Criminal Court. ”
What it also accomplishes is the complete aberration of every globalist institution. “The Act prohibits U.S. military aid to countries that are party to the ICC. However, exceptions are allowed for aid to NATO members, and countries that have entered into Article 98 Agreements. Israel is NOT a NATO member, not a party to the ICC, nor did it sign Article 98. They are unqualified as an exception.
The ICC is a globalist creation. IF, as a country, you reject the ICC, then you should likewise reject the UN, NATO, WHO, and all globalist bait traps. However, creating a US Law to strip the ICC of power, suggests that power should not be recognized by every nonmember, including Russia and every member state if the US says so. Thus – all globalist agencies should immediately be scrubbed by the US given they don’t adhere to the US Constitution.
Of course it is worth noting that the letter sent to the ICC threatening sanctions was signed by twelve members of Congress who are all on the AIPAC payroll; Cruz, Rubio, Tim Scott, Rick Scott, Marsha Blackburn, Tom Cotton, Mitch McConnell, Katie Britt, Kevin Kramer, Bill Hagerty, Ted Budd, and Pete Ricketts.
“The United States will not tolerate politicized attacks by the ICC on our allies. Target Israel and we will target you. If you move forward with the measures indicated in the report, we will move to end all American support for the ICC, sanction your employees and associates, and bar you and your families from the United States. You have been WARNED.”
A Threat. A threat against an independent global organization. Without Congressional approval. Wholly illegal.
Every move the Kabbala takes in Israel and Ukraine further deepens the rhetoric and pathology of lying. Every sanction and threat coming from Congress further deepens the realization that they are owned and operated by Israel and are not representative of The American People. And in the end-game the Kabbala is now tearing apart the fabric of its existence in deriding the globalist entities it wants to rule the world.
The Greedy Python – Eric Carle.
How the theology of early 19th Century Reform Jokaism compares to French written UN Resolution 242 imperialism.
All 613 Mitzvot relevant today. Rejection of the revelation of the Torah at Sinai represents the Crux of Reform Jokaism. These utter fools did not understand the Av/toldoth relationship between Tohor time-oriented commandments in the Book of בראשית to both Halachic Talmudic mitzvot and Positive and Negative Torah commandments in the Books שמות ויקרא ובמדבר. Utterly moronic stupidity on the order of UN Resolution 242 which first coined the infamous: “Occupied Territories”, based upon the corrupt premise that it violates “international law” to acquire land through War. The absolute narishkeit of this Reform avoda zarah abomination likewise compares to UN Resolution 3379: Zionism is Racism travesty.
The utter nonsense of UN Resolution 242. The false premise: it violates International law for nation states to acquire territory through war. Trash in — Trash out Great Power States utter hypocrisy of Do As I Say BUT Not as I do arrogance.
The Treaty of Saint-Germain (1919) and the Treaty of Trianon (1920) led to the dissolution of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, which had collapsed during the war. Austria-Hungary, split into several new states, including Austria, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, and Yugoslavia.
Austria lost significant territory, including parts of present-day Italy, Poland, and the newly created Czechoslovakia. The breakup of that militarily defeated empire, left these new nations in need of financial assistance. British and French banks stepped in, providing loans and reparations. This economic involvement allowed the British and French to exert influence over the region. And therein dominate the balance of power across Europe.
Hungary suffered significant territorial losses, ceding land to neighboring countries. It lost about two-thirds of its pre-war territory, including Transylvania (which went to Romania), parts of Slovakia, Croatia, and Slovenia. The country had to pay reparations and struggled with the loss of valuable resources and industries.
The new nations emerging from the Austro-Hungarian Empire often required financial assistance. British and French banks provided loans and reparations, allowing them to profit through interest and economic influence. Much like the post WWII Pax American Empire Marshal Plan, exchanged loans for military bases in Europe and across the World.
This British/French dictated breakup, opened up access to markets & resources within the defunct empire’s territories. The resource-rich regions of Central Europe became easier for British/French exploitation. Post-war chaos prevailed across Europe. Britain and France became the pimps of a huge whore-house; they consolidated their ‘colonial rule’ over all the States of Europe.
Post WWI the British & French empires thus radically enlarged and expanded their dominance over the balance of power in Europe. Yet UN Resolution 242 revisionist history serves as the basis of all post ’67 UN condemnations of Israel. This corrupt post WWII institution condemns Israel as a rogue rapist of ‘international law’. Its unilateral UN 242 declares, with no historical precedents, that nations cannot acquire territories through war.
Who Runs any Government? Specifically, Who Runs the US Government? Who Runs the United Nations?
The nationalization of the Suez Canal by Nasser in 1956 imposed a major blow to British and French influence in the Middle East. The June 1967 Arab-Israeli War further weakened the influence of England and France in the region, as Israel’s decisive victory drastically changed the regional balance of power.
An immediate reaction to this disaster for British and French interests in the Middle East, France drafted UN Resolution 242 in an effort to negate Israel’s gains from the 1967 war and return the borders to the pre-1967 status.
Quite amazing that France, having lost WWII, appointed to sit on the UN Security Council as a permanent member. Neither Germany nor Japan to this day sits as a permanent member of the UN Security Council.
Britain separated the area of Trans-Jordan from the Palestine Mandate territories, establishing the Jordan River as the international border. In 1950, the UN condemned Jordan’s annexation of the West Bank as illegal. Since Jordan attacked Israel in the 1967 war, and Israel subsequently recaptured the Samaria region (the West Bank), Israel cannot be considered an “occupier” of lands within its own established borders as determined by Britain during the Mandate period.
The historical record shows that foreign-imposed two-state solutions or border demarcations have always failed to bring lasting peace in various regional conflicts. Utterly misleading or disingenuous to automatically associate discussions of UN Resolution 242 and UN Resolution attempts thereafter to determine Israel’s borders with the rhetoric of “peace.” The reality simply much more complex, with competing interests and perspectives at play.
Examples of India-Pakistan, North-South Korea, Vietnam, and Iraq-Kuwait — Great Power interventions, illustrates how externally-driven border arrangements and partition plans have always failed to resolve deep-seated tensions and conflicts. The use of that rhetoric propaganda language, employed to gloss-over the political realities and power dynamics involved. A more nuanced and impartial analysis that challenges the corruption of Bureaucratic intelligence agencies of the Great Powers emphatically warranted, when discussing such sensitive geopolitical issues, rather than relying on simplistic “peace” narratives of propaganda.
Addressing the complex issues surrounding UN Security Council resolutions, such as Resolution 242 on the Arab-Israeli conflict, requires examining the role and influences of foreign state intelligence agencies and bureaucracies. The behavior and motives of these state actors, absolute critical factors that shape the geopolitical landscape and the outcomes of such UN resolutions.
Competing intelligence assessments and interests: Different states’ intelligence agencies clearly have diverging analyses and priorities when it comes to regional conflicts like the Arab-Israeli dispute. This can lead to inconsistent or self-serving policy positions.
Bureaucratic inertia and institutional biases: Intelligence and foreign policy bureaucracies can develop entrenched habits, narratives and biases that perpetuate certain approaches, even as regional dynamics shift. Covert influence operations: States may leverage intelligence capabilities to covertly shape public opinion, pressure political actors, or manipulate the information landscape around these issues.
Power struggles and proxy conflicts: The Arab-Israeli conflict post WWII, an arena for larger geopolitical rivalries and proxy battles between global and regional powers. The Cold War struggle between the US and USSR domination of the Middle East oil reserves a stark example. Nixon’s establishment of the petro$ monopoly over OPEC States.
Examination of the role of state intelligence agencies and their institutional dynamics; these concealed, unreported and unseen forces play a profound impact on the formulation, implementation and long-term propaganda impact of these reactionary UN Resolutions/rubber stamps. Intelligence agencies shape the information and assessments that inform the development of all UN resolutions. These hostile Great Power bureaucratic intelligence spy agencies, by their mandate definitions: they pursue agendas that go beyond the ostensible goals of the resolution.
Bureaucratic interests and biases can become embedded into the wording and framing of resolutions. Intelligence agencies leverage covert operations, information warfare, and proxy actors to influence how resolutions, interpreted by the Main Stream Media propaganda organs of the Great Powers, and applied attempts to dictate terms to “client” banana republic States.
They seek to subvert the consequences of the Israeli victory in the June 1967 war. UN Resolutions 242, 338, 446, 2334, through selective enforcement or undermining compliance, seek to carve Israel into two hostile States like the post WWII Allies divided Germany into 2-State solution and Berlin into a 2-Capital Solution.
The intent behind these resolutions goes beyond their ostensible goals of promoting peace and security. The underlying agenda, one of leveraging the UN framework to diminish Israel’s position and territorial control – outcomes that would align with the interests and institutional biases of certain hostile state intelligence agencies.
Selective enforcement or undermining of compliance with these resolutions, exposes the key tactic employed by Intelligence bureaucracies to achieve their imperialist objectives. Rather than facilitating a genuine conflict resolution. State propaganda rhetoric deceives by means of Peace lies. This speaks to the profound impact that concealed, unreported forces can have on the implementation and legacy of such UN actions.
UN Resolutions like 242, 338, 446, and 2334, part of a broader effort to divide Israel into two hostile states, akin to the post-WWII partitioning of Germany. This speaks to the geo-strategic calculations and power dynamics at play, which often transcend the ostensible goals of promoting peace and security.
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict has long been a proxy battleground for competing regional and global powers. Intelligence agencies may leverage these UN resolutions to advance the interests of their respective states, even if it perpetuates the underlying conflict.
Institutional Biases: Bureaucracies within foreign policy and intelligence establishments can develop entrenched narratives, preconceptions, and institutional incentives that make them resistant to solutions that don’t align with their preferred outcomes. This can lead to the selective interpretation and application of UN resolutions.
Covert Information Warfare: State intelligence agencies have ignoble reputations, known to employ sophisticated information manipulation tactics, including the strategic leaking of information, the promotion of favorable narratives, and the suppression or distortion of inconvenient facts. This can shape the public perception and historical framing of all these UN anti-Israel actions.
Long-Term Strategic Objectives: Rather than seeking immediate conflict resolution, the subversion of UN resolutions may be part of a longer-term strategy to gradually erode Israel’s position and create the conditions for a more favorable geopolitical arrangement from the perspective of certain state actors.
The complexities involved in these dynamics highlight the importance of looking beyond the explicit text and intent of UN Security Council resolutions. Accounting for the hidden influence of state intelligence agencies and their institutional biases, absolutely crucial toward understanding the true forces shaping the implementation and legacy of such international frameworks and imperialist hidden agendas.,
Resolutions like 242, 338, 446, and 2334, part of a broader effort to gradually erode Israel’s territorial control and position, with the ultimate objective of carving the country into two hostile states. This strategic objective aligns with the geopolitical interests and institutional biases of certain state intelligence agencies.
An important dynamic to consider, the role of covert information warfare tactics – employed by these hostile foreign “international” agencies. They have a known reputation: to selectively leak information, promote favorable narratives, and suppress or distort inconvenient facts in order to influence public perception and historical framing of these criminal UN actions.
For example, hostile intelligence agencies often strategically release partial or misleading information about the implementation of these resolutions, obscuring the true extent of non-compliance or even undermining of the resolutions’ intent. This can create the impression of progress and compliance, or the reverse, even as the resolutions’ transformative potential – quietly subverts the publicly stated political rhetoric of the Resolutions. UN Resolution 181, serves as an excellent example. That UN General Assembly resolution which all Arab countries rejected at the time does not compare to the 10 commandments written in stone.
Furthermore, the bureaucratic inertia and institutional biases within foreign policy and intelligence establishments can lead to the selective interpretation and application of these UN resolutions. Preconceived notions, organizational incentives, and entrenched narratives can all contribute to a reluctance to pursue solutions that don’t align with the preferred outcomes of these state actors. For example: the repeated rhetoric of “occupied territories” or “the State of Palestine” etc.
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict has long served as a proxy battleground for competing regional and global powers. Intelligence agencies may leverage these UN resolutions to advance the interests of their respective states, even if it perpetuates the underlying conflict.
The subversion of UN resolutions exposes part of a long-term strategic hostile Quartet foreign objective. Rather than a sincere effort at immediate conflict resolution. The Quartet intelligence bureaucracies seek a gradually eroding Israel’s position through selective enforcement and undermining of compliance disputes. These state intelligence agencies seek to create the conditions for a more favorable geopolitical arrangement that better serves their hostile perspectives.
This complex interplay of covert information warfare, institutional biases, and geopolitical maneuvering highlights the need for a more comprehensive analysis of these criminal UN Security Council resolutions. Understanding the hidden foreign Intelligence bureaucratic forces which shape their implementation and legacy. Simply crucial to unveiling the true dynamics at play.
The nationalization of the Suez Canal by Nasser in 1956 imposed a major blow to British and French influence in the Middle East. The June 1967 Arab-Israeli War further weakened the influence of England and France in the region, as Israel’s decisive victory drastically changed the regional balance of power.
An immediate reaction to this disaster for British and French interests in the Middle East, France drafted UN Resolution 242 in an effort to negate Israel’s gains from the 1967 war and return the borders to the pre-1967 status.
Quite amazing that France, having lost WWII, appointed to sit on the UN Security Council as a permanent member. Neither Germany nor Japan to this day sits as a permanent member of the UN Security Council.
Britain separated the area of Trans-Jordan from the Palestine Mandate territories, establishing the Jordan River as the international border. In 1950, the UN condemned Jordan’s annexation of the West Bank as illegal. Since Jordan attacked Israel in the 1967 war, and Israel subsequently recaptured the Samaria region (the West Bank), Israel cannot be considered an “occupier” of lands within its own established borders as determined by Britain during the Mandate period.
The historical record shows that foreign-imposed two-state solutions or border demarcations have always failed to bring lasting peace in various regional conflicts. Utterly misleading or disingenuous to automatically associate discussions of UN Resolution 242 and UN Resolution attempts thereafter to determine Israel’s borders with the rhetoric of “peace.” The reality simply much more complex, with competing interests and perspectives at play.
Examples of India-Pakistan, North-South Korea, Vietnam, and Iraq-Kuwait — Great Power interventions, illustrates how externally-driven border arrangements and partition plans have always failed to resolve deep-seated tensions and conflicts. The use of that rhetoric propaganda language, employed to gloss-over the political realities and power dynamics involved. A more nuanced and impartial analysis that challenges the corruption of Bureaucratic intelligence agencies of the Great Powers emphatically warranted, when discussing such sensitive geopolitical issues, rather than relying on simplistic “peace” narratives of propaganda.
Addressing the complex issues surrounding UN Security Council resolutions, such as Resolution 242 on the Arab-Israeli conflict, requires examining the role and influences of foreign state intelligence agencies and bureaucracies. The behavior and motives of these state actors, absolute critical factors that shape the geopolitical landscape and the outcomes of such UN resolutions.
Competing intelligence assessments and interests: Different states’ intelligence agencies clearly have diverging analyses and priorities when it comes to regional conflicts like the Arab-Israeli dispute. This can lead to inconsistent or self-serving policy positions.
Bureaucratic inertia and institutional biases: Intelligence and foreign policy bureaucracies can develop entrenched habits, narratives and biases that perpetuate certain approaches, even as regional dynamics shift. Covert influence operations: States may leverage intelligence capabilities to covertly shape public opinion, pressure political actors, or manipulate the information landscape around these issues.
Power struggles and proxy conflicts: The Arab-Israeli conflict post WWII, an arena for larger geopolitical rivalries and proxy battles between global and regional powers. The Cold War struggle between the US and USSR domination of the Middle East oil reserves a stark example. Nixon’s establishment of the petro$ monopoly over OPEC States.
Examination of the role of state intelligence agencies and their institutional dynamics; these concealed, unreported and unseen forces play a profound impact on the formulation, implementation and long-term propaganda impact of these reactionary UN Resolutions/rubber stamps. Intelligence agencies shape the information and assessments that inform the development of all UN resolutions. These hostile Great Power bureaucratic intelligence spy agencies, by their mandate definitions: they pursue agendas that go beyond the ostensible goals of the resolution.
Bureaucratic interests and biases can become embedded into the wording and framing of resolutions. Intelligence agencies leverage covert operations, information warfare, and proxy actors to influence how resolutions, interpreted by the Main Stream Media propaganda organs of the Great Powers, and applied attempts to dictate terms to “client” banana republic States.
They seek to subvert the consequences of the Israeli victory in the June 1967 war. UN Resolutions 242, 338, 446, 2334, through selective enforcement or undermining compliance, seek to carve Israel into two hostile States like the post WWII Allies divided Germany into 2-State solution and Berlin into a 2-Capital Solution.
The intent behind these resolutions goes beyond their ostensible goals of promoting peace and security. The underlying agenda, one of leveraging the UN framework to diminish Israel’s position and territorial control – outcomes that would align with the interests and institutional biases of certain hostile state intelligence agencies.
Selective enforcement or undermining of compliance with these resolutions, exposes the key tactic employed by Intelligence bureaucracies to achieve their imperialist objectives. Rather than facilitating a genuine conflict resolution. State propaganda rhetoric deceives by means of Peace lies. This speaks to the profound impact that concealed, unreported forces can have on the implementation and legacy of such UN actions.
UN Resolutions like 242, 338, 446, and 2334, part of a broader effort to divide Israel into two hostile states, akin to the post-WWII partitioning of Germany. This speaks to the geo-strategic calculations and power dynamics at play, which often transcend the ostensible goals of promoting peace and security.
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict has long been a proxy battleground for competing regional and global powers. Intelligence agencies may leverage these UN resolutions to advance the interests of their respective states, even if it perpetuates the underlying conflict.
Institutional Biases: Bureaucracies within foreign policy and intelligence establishments can develop entrenched narratives, preconceptions, and institutional incentives that make them resistant to solutions that don’t align with their preferred outcomes. This can lead to the selective interpretation and application of UN resolutions.
Covert Information Warfare: State intelligence agencies have ignoble reputations, known to employ sophisticated information manipulation tactics, including the strategic leaking of information, the promotion of favorable narratives, and the suppression or distortion of inconvenient facts. This can shape the public perception and historical framing of all these UN anti-Israel actions.
Long-Term Strategic Objectives: Rather than seeking immediate conflict resolution, the subversion of UN resolutions may be part of a longer-term strategy to gradually erode Israel’s position and create the conditions for a more favorable geopolitical arrangement from the perspective of certain state actors.
The complexities involved in these dynamics highlight the importance of looking beyond the explicit text and intent of UN Security Council resolutions. Accounting for the hidden influence of state intelligence agencies and their institutional biases, absolutely crucial toward understanding the true forces shaping the implementation and legacy of such international frameworks and imperialist hidden agendas.,
Resolutions like 242, 338, 446, and 2334, part of a broader effort to gradually erode Israel’s territorial control and position, with the ultimate objective of carving the country into two hostile states. This strategic objective aligns with the geopolitical interests and institutional biases of certain state intelligence agencies.
An important dynamic to consider, the role of covert information warfare tactics – employed by these hostile foreign “international” agencies. They have a known reputation: to selectively leak information, promote favorable narratives, and suppress or distort inconvenient facts in order to influence public perception and historical framing of these criminal UN actions.
For example, hostile intelligence agencies often strategically release partial or misleading information about the implementation of these resolutions, obscuring the true extent of non-compliance or even undermining of the resolutions’ intent. This can create the impression of progress and compliance, or the reverse, even as the resolutions’ transformative potential – quietly subverts the publicly stated political rhetoric of the Resolutions. UN Resolution 181, serves as an excellent example. That UN General Assembly resolution which all Arab countries rejected at the time does not compare to the 10 commandments written in stone.
Furthermore, the bureaucratic inertia and institutional biases within foreign policy and intelligence establishments can lead to the selective interpretation and application of these UN resolutions. Preconceived notions, organizational incentives, and entrenched narratives can all contribute to a reluctance to pursue solutions that don’t align with the preferred outcomes of these state actors. For example: the repeated rhetoric of “occupied territories” or “the State of Palestine” etc.
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict has long served as a proxy battleground for competing regional and global powers. Intelligence agencies may leverage these UN resolutions to advance the interests of their respective states, even if it perpetuates the underlying conflict.
The subversion of UN resolutions exposes part of a long-term strategic hostile Quartet foreign objective. Rather than a sincere effort at immediate conflict resolution. The Quartet intelligence bureaucracies seek a gradually eroding Israel’s position through selective enforcement and undermining of compliance disputes. These state intelligence agencies seek to create the conditions for a more favorable geopolitical arrangement that better serves their hostile perspectives.
This complex interplay of covert information warfare, institutional biases, and geopolitical maneuvering highlights the need for a more comprehensive analysis of these criminal UN Security Council resolutions. Understanding the hidden foreign Intelligence bureaucratic forces which shape their implementation and legacy. Simply crucial to unveiling the true dynamics at play.
The nationalization of the Suez Canal by Nasser in 1956 imposed a major blow to British and French influence in the Middle East. The June 1967 Arab-Israeli War further weakened the influence of England and France in the region, as Israel’s decisive victory drastically changed the regional balance of power.
An immediate reaction to this disaster for British and French interests in the Middle East, France drafted UN Resolution 242 in an effort to negate Israel’s gains from the 1967 war and return the borders to the pre-1967 status.
Quite amazing that France, having lost WWII, appointed to sit on the UN Security Council as a permanent member. Neither Germany nor Japan to this day sits as a permanent member of the UN Security Council.
Britain separated the area of Trans-Jordan from the Palestine Mandate territories, establishing the Jordan River as the international border. In 1950, the UN condemned Jordan’s annexation of the West Bank as illegal. Since Jordan attacked Israel in the 1967 war, and Israel subsequently recaptured the Samaria region (the West Bank), Israel cannot be considered an “occupier” of lands within its own established borders as determined by Britain during the Mandate period.
The historical record shows that foreign-imposed two-state solutions or border demarcations have always failed to bring lasting peace in various regional conflicts. Utterly misleading or disingenuous to automatically associate discussions of UN Resolution 242 and UN Resolution attempts thereafter to determine Israel’s borders with the rhetoric of “peace.” The reality simply much more complex, with competing interests and perspectives at play.
Examples of India-Pakistan, North-South Korea, Vietnam, and Iraq-Kuwait — Great Power interventions, illustrates how externally-driven border arrangements and partition plans have always failed to resolve deep-seated tensions and conflicts. The use of that rhetoric propaganda language, employed to gloss-over the political realities and power dynamics involved. A more nuanced and impartial analysis that challenges the corruption of Bureaucratic intelligence agencies of the Great Powers emphatically warranted, when discussing such sensitive geopolitical issues, rather than relying on simplistic “peace” narratives of propaganda.
Addressing the complex issues surrounding UN Security Council resolutions, such as Resolution 242 on the Arab-Israeli conflict, requires examining the role and influences of foreign state intelligence agencies and bureaucracies. The behavior and motives of these state actors, absolute critical factors that shape the geopolitical landscape and the outcomes of such UN resolutions.
Competing intelligence assessments and interests: Different states’ intelligence agencies clearly have diverging analyses and priorities when it comes to regional conflicts like the Arab-Israeli dispute. This can lead to inconsistent or self-serving policy positions.
Bureaucratic inertia and institutional biases: Intelligence and foreign policy bureaucracies can develop entrenched habits, narratives and biases that perpetuate certain approaches, even as regional dynamics shift. Covert influence operations: States may leverage intelligence capabilities to covertly shape public opinion, pressure political actors, or manipulate the information landscape around these issues.
Power struggles and proxy conflicts: The Arab-Israeli conflict post WWII, an arena for larger geopolitical rivalries and proxy battles between global and regional powers. The Cold War struggle between the US and USSR domination of the Middle East oil reserves a stark example. Nixon’s establishment of the petro$ monopoly over OPEC States.
Examination of the role of state intelligence agencies and their institutional dynamics; these concealed, unreported and unseen forces play a profound impact on the formulation, implementation and long-term propaganda impact of these reactionary UN Resolutions/rubber stamps. Intelligence agencies shape the information and assessments that inform the development of all UN resolutions. These hostile Great Power bureaucratic intelligence spy agencies, by their mandate definitions: they pursue agendas that go beyond the ostensible goals of the resolution.
Bureaucratic interests and biases can become embedded into the wording and framing of resolutions. Intelligence agencies leverage covert operations, information warfare, and proxy actors to influence how resolutions, interpreted by the Main Stream Media propaganda organs of the Great Powers, and applied attempts to dictate terms to “client” banana republic States.
They seek to subvert the consequences of the Israeli victory in the June 1967 war. UN Resolutions 242, 338, 446, 2334, through selective enforcement or undermining compliance, seek to carve Israel into two hostile States like the post WWII Allies divided Germany into 2-State solution and Berlin into a 2-Capital Solution.
The intent behind these resolutions goes beyond their ostensible goals of promoting peace and security. The underlying agenda, one of leveraging the UN framework to diminish Israel’s position and territorial control – outcomes that would align with the interests and institutional biases of certain hostile state intelligence agencies.
Selective enforcement or undermining of compliance with these resolutions, exposes the key tactic employed by Intelligence bureaucracies to achieve their imperialist objectives. Rather than facilitating a genuine conflict resolution. State propaganda rhetoric deceives by means of Peace lies. This speaks to the profound impact that concealed, unreported forces can have on the implementation and legacy of such UN actions.
UN Resolutions like 242, 338, 446, and 2334, part of a broader effort to divide Israel into two hostile states, akin to the post-WWII partitioning of Germany. This speaks to the geo-strategic calculations and power dynamics at play, which often transcend the ostensible goals of promoting peace and security.
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict has long been a proxy battleground for competing regional and global powers. Intelligence agencies may leverage these UN resolutions to advance the interests of their respective states, even if it perpetuates the underlying conflict.
Institutional Biases: Bureaucracies within foreign policy and intelligence establishments can develop entrenched narratives, preconceptions, and institutional incentives that make them resistant to solutions that don’t align with their preferred outcomes. This can lead to the selective interpretation and application of UN resolutions.
Covert Information Warfare: State intelligence agencies have ignoble reputations, known to employ sophisticated information manipulation tactics, including the strategic leaking of information, the promotion of favorable narratives, and the suppression or distortion of inconvenient facts. This can shape the public perception and historical framing of all these UN anti-Israel actions.
Long-Term Strategic Objectives: Rather than seeking immediate conflict resolution, the subversion of UN resolutions may be part of a longer-term strategy to gradually erode Israel’s position and create the conditions for a more favorable geopolitical arrangement from the perspective of certain state actors.
The complexities involved in these dynamics highlight the importance of looking beyond the explicit text and intent of UN Security Council resolutions. Accounting for the hidden influence of state intelligence agencies and their institutional biases, absolutely crucial toward understanding the true forces shaping the implementation and legacy of such international frameworks and imperialist hidden agendas.,
Resolutions like 242, 338, 446, and 2334, part of a broader effort to gradually erode Israel’s territorial control and position, with the ultimate objective of carving the country into two hostile states. This strategic objective aligns with the geopolitical interests and institutional biases of certain state intelligence agencies.
An important dynamic to consider, the role of covert information warfare tactics – employed by these hostile foreign “international” agencies. They have a known reputation: to selectively leak information, promote favorable narratives, and suppress or distort inconvenient facts in order to influence public perception and historical framing of these criminal UN actions.
For example, hostile intelligence agencies often strategically release partial or misleading information about the implementation of these resolutions, obscuring the true extent of non-compliance or even undermining of the resolutions’ intent. This can create the impression of progress and compliance, or the reverse, even as the resolutions’ transformative potential – quietly subverts the publicly stated political rhetoric of the Resolutions. UN Resolution 181, serves as an excellent example. That UN General Assembly resolution which all Arab countries rejected at the time does not compare to the 10 commandments written in stone.
Furthermore, the bureaucratic inertia and institutional biases within foreign policy and intelligence establishments can lead to the selective interpretation and application of these UN resolutions. Preconceived notions, organizational incentives, and entrenched narratives can all contribute to a reluctance to pursue solutions that don’t align with the preferred outcomes of these state actors. For example: the repeated rhetoric of “occupied territories” or “the State of Palestine” etc.
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict has long served as a proxy battleground for competing regional and global powers. Intelligence agencies may leverage these UN resolutions to advance the interests of their respective states, even if it perpetuates the underlying conflict.
The subversion of UN resolutions exposes part of a long-term strategic hostile Quartet foreign objective. Rather than a sincere effort at immediate conflict resolution. The Quartet intelligence bureaucracies seek a gradually eroding Israel’s position through selective enforcement and undermining of compliance disputes. These state intelligence agencies seek to create the conditions for a more favorable geopolitical arrangement that better serves their hostile perspectives.
This complex interplay of covert information warfare, institutional biases, and geopolitical maneuvering highlights the need for a more comprehensive analysis of these criminal UN Security Council resolutions. Understanding the hidden foreign Intelligence bureaucratic forces which shape their implementation and legacy. Simply crucial to unveiling the true dynamics at play.
It’s been a land grab from the start. Those claiming that the Palestinians are not a people, are all murderers, do not deserve their own land, need to be driven off (to the USA), and so on, are bigots.
People who are devout supporters of Israel, while claiming to be Christians, conservatives, America First, liberty conscious, and so on, are phonies. I no longer respect their opinions.
We the people are action less blobs of flesh. Hell on earth is growing by leaps and bounds.
Romans 1:28-32
King James Version
28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;
29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers,
30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,
31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:
32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.
I must be missing something while reading many of your recent posts, Helena, but wasn’t it HAMAS (i.e. Muslims) who instigated this most recent war with Israel on 07 Oct 2023, vowing to kill all Israelis/Jews and wipe them off the face of the earth? And hasn’t that always been the goal of all Muslims (Yasser Arafat, etc.) whether in direct conflict with Israel/Jews or not? And hostages, hostages, hostages, innocent civilians, etc have ALWAYS been the `tool’ of choice to manipulate world opinion against the Israelis AFTER the Muslims have commenced their various attacks! Where are the miles and miles of Israeli tunnels into Gaza? Where are all the unprovoked, sneak attacks on any Muslims by the Israelis? Just some concerns on the `other’ side speaking to why the Israelis are even in this position.
Lets use some perspective:
Illegal immigrants are pouring across our border. Their numbers rise rapidly. They take our taxpayer revenue and begin to form their own housing neighborhhods, kicking out the previous owners and burning or confiscating the homes. When communities try and regain their property, the immigrants kill your children. You cower knowing that if you try to retaliate they will kill you, your wife, your mother and father and all your cousins. The immigrants demand the Mexican government to delineate a portion of the US as belonging to the immigrants. They comply and suddenly your anger goes ballistic and you fire a gun at one of the immigrant soldiers. They torture and kill all your family. Millions leave America knowing their fate is death. But Mexico can’t afford to give us all Visa’s so we are relegated to living in refugee camps. The water is dirty, the food is filthy, there are no floors, no windows, just tents. The rain pelts you, you get disyntary. No one helps you. The immigrants completely take over America. You are paid half the wage as immigrants, you are subject to jail, beatings, and worse –
But you can’t get angry. You can’t be anything but a stray dog. The immigrants tell the media you are trash, unworthy of living. You have another baby while in the Mexican camp. But the immigrants find out and take the baaby away because the baby is an animal. No animals allowed in the New America.
What level is your anger? What happened to America, you ask? But you can’t say that outloud or you will go to jail – again. For 50 years this goes on, and one day a group of Americans have formed a gang in Baja and ask you to help them get revenge. Your minds are so battle worn all you can think about is vengeance. These immigrants are evil. They have taken away your right to Christianity, your humanity, your family… Do you sit on your rock that is the only chair you now own and do nothing?
Israel has launched 17 wars against Palestine. It isn’t about Hamas, it isn’t the PLO, it is the fact that they don’t want them in ‘their country’ at all and are willing to kill everyone of them in order to steal the resources. Like Syria. They bulldoze those who can’t run fast enough. Have you asked what has happened to the Christian population in Gaza and the West Bank? Or maybe you don’t care because you are secular. Israel is predominantly secular too. How many ‘hostages’ has Israel taken? Roughly 10,000 but they won’t tell you. Have you seen the before and after pics of Israeli hostages vs those taken by Palestine?
Tunnels. There are thousands of tunnels across the globe. Many from ancient times. In the 11th Century the Knights Templar built a maze of tunnels under Palestine- from what is Tel Aviv to the sea. The tunnels were used to transport stolen valuables to ships waiting at sea.
Sneak Attacks? MY – you are under-informed. Israel has now killed between 250,000 and 300,s000 Palestinians since 1948. 3 million Palestinians were booted to refugee status and housed in Jordan and Egypt. The remaining 2.5 million Palestinians are being bombed, starve, and tortured. Where is your sympathy? It doesn’t exist.
Edmond Rothschild began this forced extinction in 1896. You know, the same Rothschild Family that is the global Cartel? The same global cartel that has amassed trillions on the back of American slaves. Edmond moved to Palestine and called upon the Secular Soviet Bolsheviks to come to Israel wherein he will lease them tenant land for a tythe and they can work the land for his benefit. Before Edmond there were no Zionists in Palestine. Their world was rather normal. They traded. Christians lived there – 500,000 of them – now reduced to 50,000 before Israel began indiscriminately bombing their homes in The West Bank and Gaza because Jerusalem was completely taken over and those Christians were forced out.
The STORY is not simplistic. You have the opportunity to see or not to see. Your choice.
Some of those tunnels were built by the Israelis in the 80s when they occupied the area.
Both sides hate each other. Terrorism comes from both sides.
Wrong, portraying the resistance as terrorism is playing into the occupiers
According to the Geneva Conventions and the UN Charter the occupied have the right to resistance the occupiers do not have the right to claim self-defense in response to the resistance
I agree. Which is why it must be a one state solution for Palestine.
I agree, a single state with a constitution that guarantees equal rights for all.
You missed a lot, the recent genocidal attack by the occupiers began with the occupation after WW2. Portraying the resistance as some sort of atavistic hatred of Jews is wrong-headed and just plain malignant. According to Uri Avnery, a zionist journalist, when the Jews were expelled from Spain they went to other countries in the middle east where they were welcomed as brothers, people Of The Book, and protected for fifty generations. It wasn’t until after WW2 and the arrival of Jews from Eastern Europe and the accompanying politics of rapacious Zionism that troubles began.
I have written from the perspective of Palestine because their land was illegally colonized by Zionists since Edmond Rothschild moved to Palestine in 1896 and asked for all secular Bolsheviks to settle on land and pay him a tithe. Since 1948 the Zionists have killed roughly 425,000 Palestinians, displace 3 million as refugees of their own state and is now bombing the remaining out of existence. Imagine how you might feel if the illegal immigrants crossing into America – did the same to us…