rosicrucianism

Innatism – A Philosophy Entwined With Rosicrucianism

Posted on by Helena

Innatism:  the view that the mind is born with already-formed ideas, knowledge, and beliefs. More specifically, innatism refers to the philosophy of Descartes, who assumed that God or a similar being or process placed innate ideas and principles in the human mind.  

I recently had a ‘discussion’ whereby this person was telling me that all babies are born of sin as evidenced by David’s Psalms.  My argument:  1.  If babies are born of sin they are born of the seed of satan not God.  2.  The Psalms were laments written by and specific to David for his own indiscretions  – not of every earthly being.

Gifted children.  Savants:  Often, we find incredibly gifted children born of parents without a shred of the same gift.  A form of innatism – the gift from God.  Akiane comes to mind.  But child prodigies are found in music, math, science, etc…  And there is no explanation.  Empiricists, by contrast, believe that children are born a blank slate and all knowledge comes from experience and the genetic transference.   However, the concept that our brains are conclusively a genetic inheritance is disproven by gifted children. 

According to Descartes, experience is the catalyst that ignites the innate behavior or knowledge.  If a pianist child prodigy is never allowed to experience a piano, the innate cannot be formed or function.  So, experience is not eliminated, it is put in second place.

This philosophy seems in line with Rosicrucianism whereby the knowledge is in our brains but the parameters of our abilities are pre-defined such as the spectrums of light and sound.  And experience does not allow those parameters to be expanded – as such we all see and hear within an earthly not Godly mutation.  Rosicrucian’s simply broke the parameters.

AKIANE:  “…reliefs and paintings in one of the parochial schools I attended greatly influenced my later attraction to legendary figures. For the first time I got to encounter the world’s view of what divinity was supposed to be, but deep down I felt that I perceived everything in a much broader and deeper sense. It appeared to me as if most people were completely ignorant of other realities, or that the realities they perceived were seen only from a very narrow angle.”

Dreams can release us from the earthly boundaries.  Do you ever fly in your dreams?  Where do you go?  How do you fly?  Do you have a takeoff and landing?  My last flying dream was different than all the rest:  I was inside a stadium or gymnasium, every other time I was outside.  I was training other people how to fly and coming down too fast for my landing with not enough space to accommodate.  I landed hard and hurt my knee.  When I woke up, I could barely walk.  Weeks of healing.   

Many of these early philosophers, including Descartes, cite Plato and Aristotle as their primary influence in thought.  The earliest manuscripts we have of their works date from the 9th and 10th centuries AD leaving us to speculate who actually wrote them.  Nonetheless, both Aristotle and Plato discussed Homer’s mythology extensively, not as a myth, but through allegorical, critical and moralistic glimpses of truth.

In a critique of Aristotle on Religion, Israeli, Mor Segev, claims Aristotle thought the stories absurd, and thus Greek religion is thus false.  The Greek language has multiple meanings for ‘religion’, including mystery cults, reverence, pious, ceremonies, etc…  The belief in God as has been built by the Vatican was not of the conscience mind during the time of Plato.  They referenced a divine principle as ‘the beginning’.  God was a part of the cosmos – an entity that reflects the universe.

But Segev’s entire thesis is built on the premise that ‘religion’ in the 4th century BC was parallel to how we define religion today – which is a wholly flawed argument.  The gods of mythology did not present as a singular creator, but more as super humans, ie the Nephilim who mated with earthly women and thus created genetic mutants. 

Releasing the mind from its earthly constraints as imposed by ‘experts’ and ‘leaders’ to keep us from the fulfillment of the universe can be achieved.  We know because history shows us time and again…

Rosicrucianism: Hidden Esoteric Knowledge of Enlightenment

Posted on by Helena

According to the Media, the Great Replacement Theory is a ‘conspiracy theory’ that falsely asserts that Jews and others are orchestrating a plot to replace white populations.  In the late 19th century, a prominent French journalist warned that Jews would “destroy” French culture.  Why?  A means of destroying intellectualism.  Exactly why DEI was initiated which advocated for hiring based on race instead of skill.  Now we are facing an existential shortage of qualified workers.  Where have all the Hawkings disappeared to?

The concept of replacing the white male population has roots in ancient history as antisemitism has existed since the money lenders opted their power.  But The Protocols of Zion put the agenda into a format, a time table, and a step-by-step process with those who claim the Protocols are a forgery specifically include Free Masons and Zionists.  As in the wolf guarding the hen-house.

Before the Protocols, before the Free Masons there were the Rosicrucian’s whose order was revealed in a manifesto in 1610 –   Fama Fraternitatis Rosae Crucis which claims the birth of the order sometime in the early 14th century.  Like mythology, the Germelschausen family is considered myth, or legend, and is said to be the father source of Rosicrucianism having come from – Germany. Mysticism, healing, physics, occultism, astrology and math are central core esoteric knowledge.

Rosicrucianism was popular throughout the Period of Enlightenment and adopted by the Free Masons as well as the Black Nobles.  The occult aspect wasn’t necessarily how we would describe it today; it was more about hidden knowledge, alchemy, and humanity’s spiritual potential.  Something akin to American Indians being one with nature.  Not unlike many today who search for reality vs the illusion we have accepted.  Ultimately, the knowledge of the Enlightenment period was quashed and civilization in America was reduced to cowboys, shacks, outdoor toilets, and remedial reading.

Only now has it resurfaced, and the Keepers of the Gate are desperate to maintain the remedial.  That would be DEI.  It would be flooding countries with persons who have no education, stunted knowledge, and their only wisdom that of survival.  In essence, these elites/Cabala’s are not Rosicrucian’s, they are some sort of bastard child attempting to put the genie back in the bottle.  The Rosicrucian’s desperately wanted to share their knowledge, they wrote essays, books, gave lectures, taught in universities, and were a powerful critical thinking influence.

So, who quashed them?

The Church.  The early church saw Rosicrucian’s as a power threat.  In order to denounce them, they expanded the definition of occult to satanism and renamed philosophy, nature, astrology and alchemy as the devil’s work.  Effectively, the ‘knowledge’ was thus hidden.  So how did this church mantra get hustled by Zionists and Free Masons?

The movement went underground by the late 18th century due to opposition from the Church and denunciations that they embraced demonic attributes.  They took their knowledge with them.

By 1900, Rosicrucianism had basically been completely quashed.  AMORC was organized in 1915 by Harvey Spencer Lewis, but the ancient knowledge was now already hidden and the handful of ‘new Rosicrucianism bore little resemblance to the order of ancient knowledge.  Astrology was considered a pseudoscience, philosophy was replaced with science as fact, and alchemy was relegated to witches brew by the Rockefellers.  The occult was effectively labeled satanism in the church and intellectualism was relegated to the basement where it remains for most.

In its place the Protocols of The Elders of Zion rose to assure that the ancient knowledge would never be shared with the proletariats.   The Vatican was central in burying the ancient knowledge and likely participated in The Protocols with the Zionists.  Herzl is credited as the father of Zionism.  He was considered a Neolog Jew advocating more of a political ideology rather than a religious one.  Neolog Judaism was a branch of the Enlightenment wherein modernization of the religion was instituted by Rabbi Aaron Chorin creating a schism.  Today’s secular Jews evolved from the Neolog schism.

Assimilation became popular and the religion of Judaism was for the minority.  This is where Ashkenazi’s are differentiated – they are secular, therefore they have no Biblical heritage.  The Rosicrucian’s effectively disappeared along with traditional Jews.  The Church aligned with the secular Ashkenazis.  And Knowledge was no longer the tree of life – but the tree of death.

A transfer of power shifted away from The People and was thus relegated to only a select group – we call the Kabal.  However, all knowledge likely has been preserved and is buried in the 52 mile tomb that sits beneath Vatican City.  Protected and Hidden.