Is the Ukraine War linked with the Israel War linked to the greater Middle East war that never ended? Common denominators offer some insight.
The Gulf War: Seemingly precipitated by the loss of US control over Iran via the Shah, Reza Pahlavi. The Shah was overthrown due to his complicity in stealing Iran’s oil on behalf of western governments. An “Iranian Revolution” took place against the Ayatollah. The US backed Saddam Hussein was ordered to attack for no reason other than Iran was weakened by the Revolution inspired by the CIA. 8 years of war produced no victory and the death of half a million.
In 1990 Saddam accused Kuwait of stealing their oil and the Gulf War expanded with the US siding with Kuwait. Saddam claimed the US government embraced imperialism. He opposed the colonialism of Palestine by the Jews. The US declared war on Iraq. Saddam was exiled and ultimately executed. The US installed an interim president, Ghazi Mashal Ajil al-Yawer.
The first installed president was then Fuad Masum, a self-described Kurdish communist. The current president is a western backed wealthy Kurd as well. Iraq is effectively a US colony.
Syrian War: A western backed Revolution is organized in 2010 as Assad refuses to designate Syria as a western proxy. Oil is the target. The US backed Free Syrian Army initiates the civil war asserting as their goal – secularism and western ideology. NATO and the West begin the bombing campaign. A common theme begins to develop as the Western backed militia’s and armies within Syria and Iraq all claim to support a ‘secular state’, and the confiscation of OIL. Today, Syria’s oil is guarded by US Troops in the north and trafficked to the western backed Iraq government.
During the Syrian bombing campaign, it became known that the US was financially and militarily backing various terrorist organizations connected to ISIS. It was also rumored that ISIS was a creation of the Mossad.
Ukraine: A western backed CIA infiltrates Ukraine via the Color Revolution in 2014. Ukraine capitulates. The secular Nazi Azov Battalion is installed as Ukraine’s National Guard and begins to systematically kill eastern Russians in Ukraine. A Jewish burlesque dancer is installed as president. Ukraine has oil, black soil and $11 trillion in rare earth minerals. These minerals are essential for magnets used in every electronic device, batteries, cars and of course – ‘defense’ weapons.
Today, Ukrainian and CIA personnel are in northern Syria at the US base in Idlib for training of the Hayat Tahrir al-Sham group, attempting to recruit fighters to join the Ukrainian armed forces. The al-Sham group are a jihadist militia, part of the Syrian Revolution, and labeled a terrorist group by Russia. Their opponents include Israel and the US. Which would be impossible given they are being trained by the US to fight Russia. Newspeak.
Israel/Lebanon: Lebanon’s parliament is evenly divided between Christians and Muslims who each hold 64 seats. They work in tandem. Despite Netanyahu declaring that the goal was the elimination of Hamas, his real goal was to secularize and colonize Palestine and Lebanon. Hezbollah was established by Lebanese clerics primarily to fight the 1982 Israeli invasion of Lebanon.
In 1982, the Multinational Force in Lebanon (MFL) was created by the US to end the involvement of the PLO in Syria and Lebanon’s respective governments. In 1982, a non-PLO affiliate group, Abu Nidel’ attempted to assassinate Israel’s London ambassador. Israel blamed the PLO and initiated War against Lebanon. Israel and the US installed Bachir Gemayel as president of Lebanon. He was assassinated for Treason.
The MFL completely disappeared and the UN, US, France, Italy, and the UK took over Lebanon. Lebanese were not too keen and bombed the US embassy. The bombing was considered an act of terrorism against the occupiers of Lebanon. Lebanon, once a semi-wealthy state has been a target for colonization since 1975 when revolutions were ‘created’. Various militias rose to secure Lebanon’s independence and sovereignty, including Hezbollah.
In 1997 The US declared Hezbollah a terrorist organization at the designation of President Clinton.
The PLO was called a terrorist organization, Assad was called a terrorist, Hussein was called a terrorist, Iran is a terrorist state, Hamas is a terrorist organization as is Hezbollah. According to the leaders of the West; America and Israel. Why? To create an ‘Enemy’. TO afford the West the justification for not just war but colonization and genocide.
The rewriting of history. The common denominators in all wars include the UK, US and Israel. The rest of the Western Regime countries are proxies doing the bidding of their Masters. The transformation to Secularism is paramount. The transformation requires the degradation of morals and ethics and truth. The continuous theft of resources is the gravy train. And death is celebrated.
As Israel unleashes its magic technology of phone and pager devices fixed with bombs – to think our own phones don’t have that hack as well might be a bit short-sighted. Enemies are ANYONE who disagrees with the narrative. Does your phone have a bomb implanted ready to be detonated?
Your enemies are who you believe are your allies, and your allies are your enemies. It doesn’t stop with Ukraine vs Russia or Israel vs Palestine… Nor did it start there. This upside down allusion and hypnosis began in the 18th century when the King James and Rheims Bible editions were translated into English with the word Jew replacing Iudaeus. Iudaeus was a resident of Judea regardless of tribe, race or religion.
The New Testament was thus usurped to refer to a secular people.
Does a correlation exist between kamalah Harris’s boycott of Israeli PM’s speech before the full House of the US Congress, and the British and French ministers boycotting the Israeli PM’s speech before the UNGA?
Recently, the Israeli PM gave a speech before the UN-nations General Assembly. A slew of nations spewed their contempt for the Jewish State and boycotted this speech by Bibi?
The German representative voice support for the previous UN-nation GA condemnation of Israel and demanded for an immediate Cease-Fire. Despite the speech Bibi gave before the full US Congress, boycotted by Kamala Harris. President Biden calls for an immediate cease-fire. Britain, France together with South Africa (who accused Israel of genocide) together walked out and boycotted PM Bibi’s speech before the UN General Assembly. Why?
Israel permits tons of food aid to Gazans. Therefore the charades parlor games of “Humanitarian issue” simply shallow propaganda. The US did not supply “humanitarian aid” to Northern Vietnam during that long war. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) fears of “famine” compares to the South African blood libel of “Genocide”! Great Power strategic interests concerning maintenance of their share of the balance of power in the Middle East makes me very skeptical of the so called “humanitarian aid issue” raised by foreign powers who promote a hostile to Israel “Cease-Fire Now” “Surrender Israel” agenda!
It’s essential to recognize that humanitarian aid isn’t always solely about political alignment or historical context. It’s true that the U.S. did not provide direct humanitarian aid to the North during that period. The geopolitical dynamics of the Cold War influenced decisions related to aid distribution. It’s crucial to differentiate between wartime policies and post-war humanitarian efforts; Israel currently fighting a war on 7 fronts: Gaza, Lebanon, Syria, Samaria, Iraq, Yemen, and Iran; over 60,000 Israelis “refugees inside their own country!”
Britain France and Germany oppose the Israeli war effort. As proven by Britain, French boycotting the speech given by the Israeli PM before the UNGA, as did Kamala Harris boycott the Israeli PM speech given to the full House of the US Congress.
Many Israelis perceive calls for a cease-fire as great power politically motivated rather than genuinely humanitarian; the US supplied no humanitarian aid to North Vietnam. Critics argue that cease-fire Great power demands serve only as a means to pressure Israel without adequately addressing its genuine security concerns. Israelis perceive these foreign international demands as attempts to undermine Israel’s right to defend itself. That self-centered great power foreign powers push for cease-fires to establish conditions favorable to their own strategic interests in the Middle East, rather than genuinely seeking peace or stability in the region.
All previous foreign imposed cease-fires have always led to renewed hostilities, making many Israelis distrustful and very skeptical concerning the sincerity of such Foreign imposed dictates of “peace”. The jargon rhetoric of peace ignores the key requirement that peace stands upon the foundation of trust. Post Shoah Israelis do not trust England, France or Germany.
The lack of U.S. humanitarian aid to North Vietnam is often cited as an example of how geopolitical considerations can overshadow humanitarian concerns. This historical lens informs current perceptions of foreign involvement in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The legacy of the Holocaust (Shoah) deeply affects Israeli perspectives on trust, especially toward countries that have historically been seen as unsupportive or even hostile.
This historical trauma influences contemporary views on international relations. Past cease-fires that resulted in renewed violence contribute to a pervasive distrust of international interventions. Many Israelis feel that without a solid foundation of trust, calls for peace are viewed as empty rhetoric. Ultimately, many Israelis seek a peace process rooted in mutual trust ie direct face to face negotiations with our Arab and Muslim peace partners. Israel outright rejects the role of the UN-nations and its non stop condemnations of Israel starting with British and French written UNSC 242. Chapter VI not Chapter VII Korean war dictates imposed by “international law” bogus rhetoric propaganda. International law stands only upon agreed and signed Treaties of alliance between nation states.
The UNGA mob rule routine condemnations of Israel exposes the unobjective forum of the UN-nations. Genuine peace between Israel and its Arab and Muslim partners and allies, built on Arab and Muslim countries recognizing and addressing the legitimate security needs of Israel.
The emphasis on treaties and agreements reflects a belief that international law should be based on mutual consent rather than unilateral condemnations. Many Israelis view UN resolutions as unbalanced and lacking legitimacy. These themes illustrate the complexity of the Israeli perspective on international relations, particularly in the context of the ongoing conflict. The interplay between historical trauma, security concerns, and skepticism of foreign motives continues to shape discussions about peace and stability in the region.
Many Israelis view calls for an immediate cease-fire from countries like Germany, France, Britain, and others as being politically motivated rather than genuinely humanitarian in nature. They see these demands as attempts to pressure Israel and undermine its right to defend itself, without adequately addressing Israel’s legitimate security concerns. Rooted in historical experiences, including the lack of U.S. humanitarian aid to North Vietnam and the legacy of the Holocaust, many Israelis are deeply skeptical of foreign powers’ involvement and mediation efforts.
There is a pervasive distrust of international interventions, especially from countries with a history of being seen as unsupportive or even hostile toward Israel.
Israel’s position emphasizes that any potential peace process must prioritize its security needs as a fundamental requirement. The rhetoric around humanitarian issues is viewed by many Israelis as a means to obscure the underlying geopolitical motivations of foreign powers, who may be more concerned with maintaining their strategic interests in the region.
In summary, the Israeli perspective presented in the context highlights the deep complexities and sensitivities surrounding the conflict, where historical experiences, security concerns, and distrust of foreign intervention shape the country’s response to international demands and mediation efforts. Addressing these core issues is seen as essential for any meaningful progress toward a lasting peace.
The opposition of Germany, France, and Britain to the Israeli war effort can be understood through the complex interplay of historical experiences, geopolitical interests, and perceptions of trust.
Historically, the Arab-Israeli War of 1948 and the United Nations’ role in brokered cease-fires have shaped the perceptions of foreign involvement in the region. The legacy of the Holocaust and the geopolitical dynamics of the Cold War further influenced decisions related to aid distribution and perceptions of trust.
Germany’s unequivocal support for Israel has eroded its soft-power footprint in the region, leading to growing condemnation from Arab countries who view the war as genocidal. Germany’s initial backing of Israel’s assault in Gaza has tarnished its reputation across the Middle East.
France, Germany, the United Kingdom, Italy, and the United States have issued a joint statement denouncing Hamas and pledging to ensure Israel’s ability to defend itself. However, the German government’s position is rarely shared by staff of German institutions with experience in the Middle East.
Many Israelis perceive calls for a cease-fire as politically motivated rather than genuinely humanitarian, and view these demands as attempts to pressure Israel and undermine its right to defend itself. The lack of trust in England, France, or Germany is rooted in historical experiences and perceptions of unsupportive or hostile attitudes.
In summary, the opposition to the Israeli war effort by these countries is influenced by a complex web of historical trauma, security concerns, and skepticism of foreign motives. Addressing these core issues is seen as essential for any meaningful progress toward a lasting peace.
The shifts in U.S. foreign policy can influence how Western European countries engage with issues like Israel and Palestine. Biden’s administration has been more aligned with European perspectives on human rights and diplomacy in the region, while Trump’s approach often aligned more closely with certain Israeli policies. Overall, these differences illustrate contrasting philosophies in U.S. foreign policy and how they affect relationships with European allies regarding strategic interests in the Middle East.
The DemoCRAPS Biden/Harris share a close diplomatic alliance with Germany England and France. However Trump, based upon his criticism of the failure of European countries to make a 2% Nato contribution to that alliance, that Trump does not hold close diplomatic relations with Western European strategic interests in the Middle East?
Under Biden and Harris, there has been an emphasis on restoring alliances with traditional partners in Europe, including Germany, England, and France. This includes a more collaborative approach on issues like the Middle East and NATO contributions, reflecting a commitment to multilateralism.
Trump often criticized European nations for not meeting the 2% NATO spending target, which affected diplomatic relations. His administration’s policies were characterized by a more unilateral stance, especially regarding the Middle East. Trump’s approach to foreign policy was often less aligned with traditional European strategic interests, focusing instead on specific alliances with countries like Israel and Saudi Arabia, sometimes at the expense of broader European collaboration.
Yes, and more corruption was actually done in the days after the Ascension. The writers of the scripture being the rabbis ( who have repeatedly contaminated the scriptures) and they actually changed (OT) the biblical timeline by at least 750 years or more, leaving out whole generations of the Israelites, which would also interfere with the end time prophesies and timelines of those like Daniel. Remember these rabbis hated and denied Jesus and wanted to discredit him in any way possible. The purest extant version of the bible is the Septuagint, which was directly translated (by the Greeks) from the Hebrew and Aramaic texts written long before Jesus. After Jesus, the furious Pharisees, Scribes and the Sanhedrin worked to corrupt the scriptures of Mathew, Mark, Luke and John. After all, they thought themselves more important than God, so great was their arrogance. And still is. And only the Lord knows what the Papacy did in their reign (approx 590-1530) of absolute totalitarian rule of Europe.
The extent of madness is literal
Great point about substituting a (then) slang term, Jew, for Israelite. I must say, however, that that error predated the King James Bible with both Wycliffe and Tyndale and all of the Greek into English translators also guilty. Another mistake was the purposeful mistranslation of the Greek Word “ethne” or “ethnos” into “Gentile.” And doubly so since if they wanted it to mean non-Israelite (it didn’t) it should have not been capitalized away from gentile. No dictionary capitalizes gentile. So why do so many capitalize Jew? The fix is in. See the book titled “The Mystery of the Gentiles.”
You may also find this link interesting.
https://ia803205.us.archive.org/27/items/GentileEwing/Gentile%20-%20Ewing.pdf
Isn’t it fascinating that the whole world seems to be on fire because of a small piece of real-estate located at ~ 31°46’8.54″ N 35°12’58.79″ E ?
Old Testament: God’s Law. Concerned with bloodline to Jesus. Kingdom in Jerusalem.
New Testament: Commentary on true meaning of God’s Law. Not concerned with bloodline. Kingdom is within you.
Keep looking up! When God is finished with counterfeit Isreal (Esau), Counterfeit Isreal will become irrelevant. Then, we will understand.
They warned us that the extent of the lies will cause great distress and suicides and yet we are perhaps 10% to 12% there…
Everything I was told growing up in US schools about World History was programming to enable the Zionist takeover of governments thru their lies. America has been Israel’s proxy for a long time. They have to go for broke now because too many people see their hypocrisy and deceit. Time grows short and we’ll see a lot of False Flags all over the world seeking to distract attention that would focus on Benny and the Bankers.
I was taught that the Russian revolution was about poor peasants rising up against the suppressive monarchy.
Iran was better off with the Shah. Regardless of how he was put into power, he was removed from power badly, and the nation greatly suffered. Now Iran women are captives again. With the Shah, women were going to college and dressing better. Iranians I knew back then were horrified at the coup against the Shah. They said the rebels were murderous people who bussed in ignorant peasants to protest, carrying signs they could not read, chanting things they did not understand.
Look how Israel provokes. This is an awful dirty act of terror. It will affect international commerce. Devices will need more inspections and cost. People are saying now only buy devices from China.
This King James Bible has done incredible damage. It amounts to “I will send you to heaven if you worship Israel”.
I was outraged. Newsmax is a network I watch when away. They are running one of those aid to Israel commercials, asking for money for bomb shelters!!! One of the paid proponents is this RINO Huckabee. I always knew he was bad based on his history a governor of Arkansas.
“dressing better’ – based on western ideology – always trying to make other cultures the same as ours. First misnomer. It is not for anyone to rearrange the deckchairs for ANY country.
newsmax CEO is best friends with Billy Clinton… another illusion