The US Senate hired a 2015 startup company, New Knowledge, to analyze the Russian threat that has been inserted in all our social media platforms targeting conservatives and left leaning African-American citizens. New Knowledge lists two founders: Jonathon Morgan a published researcher for the Brookings Institute, Atlantic Council and Washington Post, a former advisor for the State Department where he developed strategies for digital counter-terrorism, and leader for Data For Democracy, an organization targeting white supremacists and far right thinkers with the goal to develop analytics to suppress their blogs. In other words, Mr. Morgan would appear to be heavily leaning toward the left and advocating means to completely obliterate conservative media including blogs. Ryan Fox is the co-founder of New Knowledge. He spent 15 years in the SIGINT Divisions of NSA.
New Knowledge boasts as one of it’s prime investors; GGV Capital. With offices in Beijing, Shanghai, and San Francisco, their Managing Partners reflect a who’s who of infinitely cyber-secure – China. Of course the irony is not lost that a dominant China company would invest in a US company whose aim is to create analytics to censor all forms of US Media while blaming Russia.
The other venture capital company backing New Knowledge is Lux Capital. In 2011, former CIA Director under Bill Clinton, James Woolsey, joined Lux as a venture partner.
An obvious question would be why the Senate panel investigating Russian interference in US Social Media would hire a ‘startup company’ to provide their evidence? And why do all roads always point back to Liberal Progressives?
The UK’s Oxford University, and Graphika, a US company whose CEO/founder is Dr. John Kelly, also provided the research for Mueller’s team with regard to Russian interference/meddling. Kelly is also CEO of Morningside Analytics – a parallel to the now defunct Cambridge Analytics formerly based out of the UK. In other words, the information Team Mueller is using to build his case against Russia, is derived from UK based intelligence and analytics organizations. The same UK that created the Trump Dossier.
The New York Times indicates another player in the Mueller Hoax – Canfield Research Group LLC, whose embedded link goes into clouds – literally. As in, they don’t exist.
And “Somehow” both the New York Times and Washington Post managed to secure a copy of the report before it was released…
The salacious report has been in the making for 3 years – terminology on the left continues to reference election interference, whereas Russian meddling is probably more likely, and not really uncommon. Obviously, all these US and UK companies with hacktivist hacktivism as their slated specialty are busy meddling wherever they can. And ultimately censorship is the end game.
UPDATE: New Knowledge, Jonathon Morgan, implicated in Democrat funding of the creation of fake Russian Bots to take down Roy Moore by implying he was funded by Russian intelligence.
One thought on “Russian Election Meddling: As Reported By Mueller’s Hackers”
I’ve been fascinated by the Roy Moore saga since reading Thomas Wictor’s old tweets researching him and watching WaPo Fiction Series roll out (notice the template? 37 yr old accusation at last minute + More Women Come Forward!!” tested on Moore and tried again on Kavanaugh!)
This new piece of information is just perfect.
An AL blogger suggested that #ProjectBirmingham included the WaPo Fiction process. Seems plausible. Probable.
That Roy Moore was THAT much of a threat to Democrats (+ GOPe) is also interesting.
Hope you look into this — appreciate your excellent research