NEW CDC COVID DEFINITION

THE NEW CRITERIA FOR DEFINING A PERSON AS HAVING COVID DISEASE AS THE PRIMARY CAUSE OF HOSPITALIZATION/OR DEATH

● Acute onset or worsening of at least two of the following symptoms or signs:

fever (measured or subjective),

chills,

rigors,

myalgia,

headache,

sore throat,

nausea or vomiting,

diarrhea,

fatigue,

congestion or

runny nose

OR ● Acute onset or worsening of any one of the following symptoms or signs: 

cough,

shortness of breath,

difficulty breathing,

olfactory disorder,

taste disorder,

confusion or

change in mental status,

persistent pain or pressure in the chest,

pale, gray, or blue-colored skin, lips, or nail beds, depending on skin tone,

inability to wake or stay awake

Severe respiratory illness with at least one of the following:

Clinical or radiographic evidence of pneumonia,

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). A2.

Laboratory Criteria for Reporting ●

Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in a post-mortem obtained respiratory swab or clinical specimen using a diagnostic molecular amplification test performed by a CLIA-certified provider, OR ●

Detection of SARS-CoV-2 genomic sequence, OR ●

Detection of SARS-CoV-2 specific antigen in a post-mortem obtained respiratory swab or clinical specimen using a diagnostic test performed by a CLIA-certified provider, OR ●

Detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid and spike protein receptor binding domain (RBD) specific antibodies in serum, plasma, or whole blood by a CLIA-certified provider. NOTE: Some jurisdictions may opt to include testing performed by individuals at home using over-the counter tests.

CDN/CDC

2 thoughts on “NEW CDC COVID DEFINITION

  1. In other words, if I cough to clear my throat, I have covid? Cool! Then that also means I have dozens of other similar illnesses and diseases that have exactly the same symptoms. Thank you innate immune system for keeping me alive for another day to fight the current mRNA injection terrorism.

  2. There are no vaccines for the common cold, yet we’re told there are vaccines for the COVID-19 common cold!

    “There are no vaccines for the common cold.”

    https://www.merckmanuals.com/professional/infectious-diseases/respiratory-viruses/common-cold

    …and…

    “Cold viruses have a lot in common, but each type has its own style, too.

    Rhinovirus. This bunch is most active in early fall, spring, and summer. They cause 10%-40% of colds. You’ll feel plenty miserable when you catch one, but the good news is they rarely make you seriously sick.

    Coronavirus. These tend to do their dirty work in the winter and early spring. The coronavirus is the cause of about 20% of colds. There are more than 30 kinds, but only three or four affect people.

    RSV and parainfluenza. These viruses cause 20% of colds. They sometimes lead to severe infections, like pneumonia, in young children.”

    https://www.webmd.com/cold-and-flu/cold-guide/common_cold_causes

    The above identifies the Marxist co-option of the West’s institutions in cooperation with Marxist China’s spreading [pun intended] a non-existing virus* for the purpose of following Marx’s directive for the “abolition of religion”, and the destruction of those civilizations “whose spiritual aroma is religion”…

    Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right, Karl Marx (1843)

    “The struggle against religion is, therefore, indirectly the struggle against that world whose spiritual aroma is religion.”

    …and…

    “The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is required for their real happiness. The demand to give up the illusion about its condition is the demand to give up a condition which needs illusions.”

    …and…

    “It is, therefore, the task of history, once the other-world of truth has vanished, to establish the truth of this world.”

    Now you know what Marxists are referring to when they utter the phrase, “The Struggle”…

    “The struggle against religion is, therefore, indirectly the struggle against that world whose spiritual aroma is religion.”
    ——————————-
    * So how is it that rtPCR will identify a positive result for COVID-19 when such a pathogen doesn’t exist, you ask? Simple, rtPCR has a built-in error called homologs…

    “5′ nuclease assay specificity

    Assay specificity is the degree that the assay includes signal from the target and excludes signal from non-target in the results. Specificity is arguably the most important aspect of any assay. The greatest threat to assay specificity for 5′ nuclease assays is homologs. Homologs are genes similar in sequence to that of the target, but they are not the intended target of the assay. Homologs are extremely common within species and across related species.”

    https://www.gene-quantification.de/real-time-pcr-handbook-life-technologies-update-flr.pdf

    That means every time a positive result is obtained under rtPCR, in fact it’s a homolog that’s detected, a similar nucleotide sequence to that of the target medium being tested.

    In fact, at the bottom of each odd numbered page of Life Technologies’ handbook, it explicitly clarifies…

    “For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures”

    https://www.gene-quantification.de/real-time-pcr-handbook-life-technologies-update-flr.pdf

    In the case of ivermectin, we witness clear suppression of viral loads…

    “Importantly, the use of ivermectin demonstrated a clear suppression of RNA viruses such as DENV 1–4 [17], West Nile [15] and influenza.”

    https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/13/6/989/htm

    …and rtPCR bases its ‘test’ results on viral load, therefore when ivermectin suppresses the viral load for the homolog that would otherwise produce a positive ‘test’ result, we end up with a negative ‘test’ result instead. As for ivermectin itself, it does appear to suppress viral loads, giving the drug a new lease on life as a treatment for many diseases not originally approved for the drug, but not a vaccine.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.