MASK EFFICACY: NIH PEER REVIEWED STUDY

FUN FIND!

JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE:  Peer Reviewed Study

MASK EFFICACY:   According to a peer reviewed study on the value/efficacy of surgeons wearing masks, the NIH and NHS found their was NO EVIDENCE that masks protected against viral or bacterial infections and were recommended as “Hospital Theatre Discipline”…   as in ‘dress code.

“Overall there is a lack of substantial evidence to support claims that facemasks protect either patient or surgeon from infectious contamination.”

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4480558/

 

 

4 thoughts on “MASK EFFICACY: NIH PEER REVIEWED STUDY

  1. The following medical science observation regarding vaccines for the common cold (which I wish I had thought to make December 11, 2000 when the first COVID-19 vaccine was approved for use) will jolt you awake…

    If there exist vaccines for COVID-19 (which is a common cold virus that also include the human rhinoviruses, parainfluenza, and adenoviruses), therefore the inability to produce vaccines for the common cold due to their high mutation rates has been solved, but there are no vaccines for common cold viruses; which tells us (1) there is no vaccine for COVID-19; (2) that COVID-19 doesn’t exist outside of a jerry rigged genome located in computer databases; which informs us that (3) any jab received for the pathogen referred to as COVID-19 is a poison whose purpose is to carry out Marx’s call for the “abolition of religion”, and the destruction of those civilizations “whose spiritual aroma is religion”.

    In order for a common cold vaccine to come to market, first the obstacle of common cold virus’ high mutation rates must first be solved, but this obstacle was never even attempted.

    The fact that an Earth-shattering, Nobel Prize category discovery, wasn’t made in late 2020 regarding COVID-19 vaccines’ defeat of the Common Cold proves there is no vaccine for COVID-19 and all that entails regarding COVID-19.

  2. I’ll match that, and raise you…

    Let’s take a look at a 2016 article on masks from Oral Health magazine that was deleted from the site, but captured at WayBackMachine:

    “Conclusions

    The primary reason for mandating the wearing of face masks is to protect dental personnel from airborne pathogens. This review has established that face masks are incapable of providing such a level of protection. Unless the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, national and provincial dental associations and regulatory agencies publically admit this fact, they will be guilty of perpetuating a myth which will be a disservice to the dental profession and its patients. It would be beneficial if, as a consequence of the review, all present infection control recommendations were subjected to the same rigorous testing as any new clinical intervention. Professional associations and governing bodies must ensure the clinical efficacy of quality improvement procedures prior to them being mandated. It is heartening to know that such a trend is gaining a momentum which might reveal the inadequacies of other long held dental infection control assumptions. Surely, the hallmark of a mature profession is one which permits new evidence to trump established beliefs. In 1910, Dr. C. Chapin, a public health pioneer, summarized this idea by stating, “We should not be ashamed to change our methods; rather, we should be ashamed not to do so.” 36 Until this occurs, as this review has revealed, dentists have nothing to fear by unmasking. ”

    https://web.archive.org/web/20170512002228/https://www.oralhealthgroup.com/features/face-masks-dont-work-revealing-review/

    Now let’s take a look at where that article was located and what’s there in its place…

    https://www.oralhealthgroup.com/features/face-masks-dont-work-revealing-review/

    Instead of finding the article written by John Hardie, BDS, MSc, PhD, FRCDC, we find the following outrage:

    “If you are looking for “Why Face Masks Don’t Work: A Revealing Review” by John Hardie, BDS, MSc, PhD, FRCDC, it has been removed. The content was published in 2016 and is no longer relevant in our current climate.

    Please note that the content from Oral Health Group is primarily intended to educate and inform dental professionals.

    If you are looking to further educate yourself on the topic of PPE in the dental industry, we invite you to read the articles below:

    Understanding Personal Protective Equipment

    Federal Government Creates Web Hub For Organizations Buying and Selling PPE”

    We’re informed by Oral Health that the uselessness of masks is not “relevant” to our “current climate”! The article then tells us we shouldn’t be reading this objective truth because it’s only “primarily intended to educate and inform dental professionals”!

    Now let’s go to the New England Journal of Medicine:

    “We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. Public health authorities define a significant exposure to Covid-19 as face-to-face contact within 6 feet with a patient with symptomatic Covid-19 that is sustained for at least a few minutes (and some say more than 10 minutes or even 30 minutes). The chance of catching Covid-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic.”

    https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2006372

    The NEJM doesn’t bother to tell us that the public wouldn’t be panicking if it weren’t for the Marxist co-opted institutions panicking us with horror stories of false positive COVID-19 misidentified deaths.

  3. imagine that Helena,you mean that nasty old pair of underwear i had rapped around my head wasn’t doing a damn thing,why i never!! so i can throw them out ,right?

  4. Hi

    A picture of rats might be more descriptive! Just my opinion…

    The wearing of the cult mask has nothing to do with health or the dreaded plague. It is the same as the armband in 1930s Germany. A sign of obedience,,, a sign of belief,,, a sign of zombiism. Again,,, JMO.

    regards

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.