Remember the Paris Accord, the Green Climate Fund that was touted as the savior of the world – with the help of $100 billion annually? Remember that fund that Germany and France and the EU described as all important to sustainability? Remember how Trump was demonized when he pulled the US out of the agreement and the world chastised and ridiculed him?
Apparently, not even Germany gives a hoot any longer.
Why? They can’t even begin to come close to meeting emission targets as presumed and simply have given up – the task is daunting, the funds ridiculously outside of reality, and the efforts lame.
According to the latest report by the OECD and NCE, they claim that ‘infrastructure spending needs to exceed $7 trillion per year through 2030’ in order to combat climate change.
Since it’s inception, the Paris Accord Green Climate Fund has raised a total of $10.3 billion in pledges – 20% of which came from the US under Obama. The EU is not a contributor, Russia and China did not pledge anything, and some of the pledges are actually merely ‘loans’, not full cash gifts. Based on the $7 trillion required per year since 2016, they are shy $21,989,700,000,000.
The Board at Green Climate has allocated 58% of its funds to Asia and Africa through intermediaries. These intermediaries are supposed to dole out the money toward specific goals and objectives. So who are the intermediaries? World Food Program, The World Bank, United Nations Development Program, UN Food Program, Inter-American Development Bank, etc…
None of the allocated funds are utilized for actual climate change, they are simply redistributed to banks and organizations who have no requirement to delineate transparent use of funds. In fact it appears that the UN and banks receive the far majority of funds and then disburse the funds as a loan to the project country with ‘commercial rates of interest’. A win-win for Banks and a slush fund for the UN.
While infrastructure spending can help mitigate natural disasters, like sea-walls for hurricane flooding crisis’, the Green Fund projects seem more aligned to boost agriculture and energy projects – both of which help the underlying shift in land ownership in Africa which is concentrated in higher income locals with ties to the government, China, Middle East, Netherlands, UK and US. Latin America is no different. And in reality – has absolutely nothing to do with climate change.
The World Bank recently proposed instituting an annual land tax in Africa which they claim would be utilized to help the locals who are continually displaced due to the Land Grabs. Full Disclosure: World Bank has been involved in the Land Grabs…
Does this mean that Climate Change is a farse? No. It means the Paris Accord was a sham, a Ponzi scheme to reroute funds to support land grab biofuel production while displacing hundreds of thousands of African people.
It means that banks are receiving the money, have absolutely no over-sight, and lend the money that was a gift while charging heavy interest fees that they pocket.
Germany’s carbon footprint has increased over the last few years, China’s is exploding, France and the Netherlands are tackling the problem by stating they will attempt to phase out diesel and petrol by 2040 and 2025 respectively. Really? Emissions per capita rank; Qatar, Kuwait, UAE, Australia, US, Saudi Arabia and Canada as the highest. Only a spattering of Africa countries even make the list… Hence the new definition of Climate Change – Infrastructure.
Since the US pullout, most other countries have tabled caring, because it was never about caring, it was about lining banks pockets and free infrastructure in those areas of Africa where the land grabs required better access and more water.
And despite the massive number of hurricanes and cyclones pounding countries and wreaking havoc, no one mentions building sea-walls, canals, moats, gullies, etc… to mitigate damage control.
Weather manipulation has reached far greater capacities than we can imagine. From radio frequency manipulation, to stratosphere solar deflection, to carbon capture, to cloud brightening techniques, climate geoengineering is very real and very destructive.
Harvard is apparently at the forefront of solar geo-engineering, partially funded by Bill Gates, Pritzker Foundation, The Open Philanthropy Project, and the Arnolds, the same Harvard that has accepted funding for such projects as Evolutionary Dynamics (infectious disease evolutions) for which Jeffrey Epstein was supportive.
Basically, it all evolves around the concept of the Greater Good, wherein only the select shall survive in the utilitarian view of the greater good central to hedonistic self pleasure and profit.
As in: If we, the banks, can’t have WWIII, then we, the Cabal, will create profit from other destructive means.