We are being led to believe that something is ‘fact’, based on a hypothesis. Based on an opinion, without proof. IF, our great and glorious ‘intelligence’ division can state that they have proof that Russia hacked Podesta’s emails, then we need to deal with that outcome.
However, the facts remain that John Podesta’s emails revealed information that was critically destructive in the demise of Hillary.
So, in revealing the Truth, do we attack the messenger – or the perpetrator?
There seems to be something fundamentally wrong with the logic of Democrats…
It is akin to ‘Science” being billed as factual, when in fact it is built on one hypothesis after another, with the final icing, a layer of fact. That means that the entire supposition is built on theory – and no matter ow many facts are layered onto the theory – it will still always be a ‘scientific hypothesis’.
Similarly, when the Democrats call Russia a purveyor of fabricated news and fakery because they feel they illegally hacked Podesta’s emails – it is a claim built on on a sandlot. Because A. It is a claim – not substantiated with any evidence. B. It deludes the viewer from the larger fact – the evidence released! C. It is embarrassing given the amount of fake news and propaganda perpetrated by our own media/government which is levied for one purpose only – to delude and manipulate the American population.
Given most Liberals have no religious faith, they may want to review the concept of The Log in One’s Eye… If in fact we were innocent of all ‘regime change atrocities, resultant civilian casualties, instigations of riot, chaos and civil warring, then perhaps, just maybe, we would not be viewed by the world as tyrant hypocrites.
Personally, I hope that the divestiture of politicians from our government will be the first step to a reality that we can support. Secondly, I hope that their wealth is so sufficient, that they have no desire to utilize corrupt practices and agendas to advocate their pockets instead of their people.
If in fact, Russia is found to have altered the election results, then we have every right to address that. But until such proof is existent, hypothesis merely comes across as more Liberal “Fake News” used to justify a fake candidate and her fake agenda.
For a media that is now obsessed with Truth – they should take a look at their proof…
In the meantime – they have -0- credibility, no matter how many ads they take out in their own media to alter the perspective that they relay – Truth!
Me Thinks Thou Dost Protest Too Much.
How many times did the Pentagon and the White House claim that we had NO involvement in the Syrian revolution? Only to find that the CIA and the Pentagon were funding rebels, including those affiliated with al-Qaeda?? Remember that? Or has the media attempted to quash that bit of Truth?
How often did we hear that the Ukraine coup was the result of an internal rising, only to learn that the CIA, the White House, and George Soros, were the instrumental sources? Remember? Because it is important.